Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Ohio opinions name it 3 courts 1990–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Local 4501, Communications Workers of America v. Ohio State Universitygreen2 sentences1994See, also, Local 4501, Communications Workers of Am. v. Ohio State Univ. (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 1 , 550 N.E.2d 164 , certiorari denied (1990), 497 U.S. 1025 , 110 S.Ct. 3274 , 111 L.Ed.2d 783 ; Williams v. McMackin (Mar. 31, 1992), Marion App. No. 9-91-43, unreported, 1992 WL 82529 . “ * * * ‘[S]omething less’ than a full evidentiary hearing is sufficient prior to adverse administrative action.” Loudermill, 470 U.S. at 545 , 105 S.Ct. at 1495 , 84 L.Ed.2d at 506 . 1994See, also, Local 4501, Communications Workers of Am. v. Ohio State Univ. (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 1 , 550 N.E.2d 164 , certiorari denied (1990), 497 U.S. 1025 , 110 S.Ct. 3274 , 111 L.Ed.2d 783 ; Williams v. McMackin (Mar. 31, 1992), Marion App. No. 9-91-43, unreported, 1992 WL 82529 . “ * * * ‘[S]omething less’ than a full evidentiary hearing is sufficient prior to adverse administrative action.” Loudermill, 470 U.S. at 545 , 105 S.Ct. at 1495 , 84 L.Ed.2d at 506 . | 2 | 2 |
Foreman v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.green2 sentences1994See, also, Local 4501, Communications Workers of Am. v. Ohio State Univ. (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 1 , 550 N.E.2d 164 , certiorari denied (1990), 497 U.S. 1025 , 110 S.Ct. 3274 , 111 L.Ed.2d 783 ; Williams v. McMackin (Mar. 31, 1992), Marion App. No. 9-91-43, unreported, 1992 WL 82529 . "*** '[S]omething less' than a full evidentiary hearing is sufficient prior to adverse administrative action." Loudermill, 470 U.S. at 545 , 105 S.Ct. at 1495 , 84 L.Ed.2d at 506 . {¶ 16} Appellant was given written notice of the charges against him, an explanation of appellee's evidence in the form of copies of wr 1994See, also, Local 4501, Communications Workers of Am. v. Ohio State Univ. (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 1 , 550 N.E.2d 164 , certiorari denied (1990), 497 U.S. 1025 , 110 S.Ct. 3274 , 111 L.Ed.2d 783 ; Williams v. McMackin (Mar. 31, 1992), Marion App. No. 9-91-43, unreported, 1992 WL 82529 . “ * * * ‘[S]omething less’ than a full evidentiary hearing is sufficient prior to adverse administrative action.” Loudermill, 470 U.S. at 545 , 105 S.Ct. at 1495 , 84 L.Ed.2d at 506 . | 2 | 2 |
Douglas v. Stonegreen2 sentences1994See, also, Local 4501, Communications Workers of Am. v. Ohio State Univ. (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 1 , 550 N.E.2d 164 , certiorari denied (1990), 497 U.S. 1025 , 110 S.Ct. 3274 , 111 L.Ed.2d 783 ; Williams v. McMackin (Mar. 31, 1992), Marion App. No. 9-91-43, unreported, 1992 WL 82529 . "*** '[S]omething less' than a full evidentiary hearing is sufficient prior to adverse administrative action." Loudermill, 470 U.S. at 545 , 105 S.Ct. at 1495 , 84 L.Ed.2d at 506 . {¶ 16} Appellant was given written notice of the charges against him, an explanation of appellee's evidence in the form of copies of wr 1994See, also, Local 4501, Communications Workers of Am. v. Ohio State Univ. (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 1 , 550 N.E.2d 164 , certiorari denied (1990), 497 U.S. 1025 , 110 S.Ct. 3274 , 111 L.Ed.2d 783 ; Williams v. McMackin (Mar. 31, 1992), Marion App. No. 9-91-43, unreported, 1992 WL 82529 . “ * * * ‘[S]omething less’ than a full evidentiary hearing is sufficient prior to adverse administrative action.” Loudermill, 470 U.S. at 545 , 105 S.Ct. at 1495 , 84 L.Ed.2d at 506 . | 2 | 2 |
Mason v. Departmental Disciplinary Committeegreen2 sentences1994See, also, Local 4501, Communications Workers of Am. v. Ohio State Univ. (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 1 , 550 N.E.2d 164 , certiorari denied (1990), 497 U.S. 1025 , 110 S.Ct. 3274 , 111 L.Ed.2d 783 ; Williams v. McMackin (Mar. 31, 1992), Marion App. No. 9-91-43, unreported, 1992 WL 82529 . "*** '[S]omething less' than a full evidentiary hearing is sufficient prior to adverse administrative action." Loudermill, 470 U.S. at 545 , 105 S.Ct. at 1495 , 84 L.Ed.2d at 506 . {¶ 16} Appellant was given written notice of the charges against him, an explanation of appellee's evidence in the form of copies of wr 1994See, also, Local 4501, Communications Workers of Am. v. Ohio State Univ. (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 1 , 550 N.E.2d 164 , certiorari denied (1990), 497 U.S. 1025 , 110 S.Ct. 3274 , 111 L.Ed.2d 783 ; Williams v. McMackin (Mar. 31, 1992), Marion App. No. 9-91-43, unreported, 1992 WL 82529 . “ * * * ‘[S]omething less’ than a full evidentiary hearing is sufficient prior to adverse administrative action.” Loudermill, 470 U.S. at 545 , 105 S.Ct. at 1495 , 84 L.Ed.2d at 506 . | 2 | 2 |
Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermillgreen2 sentences2008The opportunity to present reasons, either in person or in writing, why proposed action should not be taken is a fundamental due process requirement. * * * The tenured public employee is entitled to oral or written notice of the charges against him, an explanation of the employer’s evidence, and an opportunity to present his side of the story. * * * To require more than this prior to termination would intrude to an unwarranted extent on the government’s interest in quickly removing an unsatisfactory employee.” Id. at 546 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 . {¶ 29} The city held a full evidentia 2008The opportunity to present reasons, either in person or in writing, why proposed action should not be taken is a fundamental due process requirement." Cleveland Bd. of Edn. v. Loudermill (1985), 470 U.S. 532 , 546 . | 1 | 10 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Arnett v. Kennedy
green
2 sentences2017Id . at 546, 105 S.Ct. 1487 , citing Friendly, Some Kind of Hearing , 123 U.Pa.L.Rev. 1267 , 1281 (1975) ; Arnett v. Kennedy , 416 U.S. 134 , 170-171, 94 S.Ct. 1633 , 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974), and Goss v. Lopez , 419 U.S. 565 , 581, 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975). 2017Id . at 546, 105 S.Ct. 1487 , citing Friendly, Some Kind of Hearing , 123 U.Pa.L.Rev. 1267 , 1281 (1975) ; Arnett v. Kennedy , 416 U.S. 134 , 170-171, 94 S.Ct. 1633 , 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974), and Goss v. Lopez , 419 U.S. 565 , 581, 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Goss v. Lopez
green
2 sentences2017Id . at 546, 105 S.Ct. 1487 , citing Friendly, Some Kind of Hearing , 123 U.Pa.L.Rev. 1267 , 1281 (1975) ; Arnett v. Kennedy , 416 U.S. 134 , 170-171, 94 S.Ct. 1633 , 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974), and Goss v. Lopez , 419 U.S. 565 , 581, 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975). 2017Id . at 546, 105 S.Ct. 1487 , citing Friendly, Some Kind of Hearing , 123 U.Pa.L.Rev. 1267 , 1281 (1975) ; Arnett v. Kennedy , 416 U.S. 134 , 170-171, 94 S.Ct. 1633 , 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974), and Goss v. Lopez , 419 U.S. 565 , 581, 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Kennedy v. Marion Correctional Institution
green
1 sentence2003The opportunity to present reasons, either in person or in writing, why proposed action should not be taken is a fundamental due process requirement. * * * The tenured public employee is entitled to oral or written notice of the charges against him, and explanation of the employer’s evidence, and an opportunity to present his side of the story.” Kennedy v. Manon Correctional Inst. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 20, 23 , 630 N.E.2d 324 , citing Cleveland Bd. of Edn. v. Loudermill (1985), 470 U.S. 532 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 . {¶ 11} However, as discussed above, the LCA is a form of discipline. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Henderson v. Morgan
green
2 sentences1999In Henderson v. Morgan (1976), 426 U.S. 637 , 96 S.Ct. 2253 , the United States Supreme Court expounded the fundamental due process rule that a voluntary guilty plea requires an understanding of the nature of the charge. 1999In Henderson v. Morgan (1976), 426 U.S. 637 , 96 S.Ct. 2253 , the United States Supreme Court expounded the fundamental due process rule that a voluntary guilty plea requires an understanding of the nature of the charge. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.