Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re JDPgreen2 sentences2007In re J.D.P. , 85 S.W.3d 420, 422-23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, no pet.); In re G.A.T. , 16 S.W.3d 818, 828 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. denied). 2005See In re J.D.P., 85 S.W.3d 420, 422 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2002, no pet.). | 5 | 5 |
In Re GATgreen2 sentences2007In re J.D.P. , 85 S.W.3d 420, 422-23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, no pet.); In re G.A.T. , 16 S.W.3d 818, 828 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. denied). 2003Matter of G.A.T., 16 S.W.3d 818, 828 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. denied). | 4 | 4 |
Matter of EPgreen2 sentences2000See Matter of E.P., 963 S.W.2d 191 , 193 (Tex. App.-Austin 1998, no writ). 2000See Matter of E.P., 963 S.W.2d 191 , 193 (Tex. App.-Austin 1998, no writ). | 2 | 2 |
Brooks v. Stategreen1 sentence2011One of the four judges in the lead opinion, joined by a fifth judge, wrote a concurring opinion stating that Clewis’s attempt to superimpose the civil factual sufficiency standard on top of the criminal legal sufficiency standard was doomed to failure because the two standards are fundamentally distinct and cannot be harmonized, that the Jackson standard is constitutionally mandated and must be followed in all criminal cases, and that the concept of factual sufficiency review in criminal cases should be “consign[ed] . . . to the dustbin of history.” Id. at 926 (Cochran, J., concurring). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.