Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2025 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
M.C. v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Servicesgreen2 sentences2021M.C. v. Tex. Dep’t of Family and Protective Servs., 300 S.W.3d 305, 310 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2009, no pet.); In re J.J.O., 131 S.W.3d 618, 630 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2004, no pet.). 2014See In re B.C., No. 07-13-00078-CV, 2013 WL 4624618 , at *3 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Aug. 1, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“A factfinder may consider several factors in finding evidence demonstrated a parent’s inability to provide the child with a safe environment, including the parent’s participation or lack thereof in services, lack of steady housing and employment, and missed opportunities for counseling and a psychological evaluation.”); see J.M. v. Texas Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., No. 03-12-00161-CV, 2012 WL 2476790 , at *6 (Tex. App.—Austin June 26, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.); In re N.R | 4 | 4 |
In Re JJOgreen2 sentences2021M.C. v. Tex. Dep’t of Family and Protective Servs., 300 S.W.3d 305, 310 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2009, no pet.); In re J.J.O., 131 S.W.3d 618, 630 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2004, no pet.). 2019See M.C. v. Tex. Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 300 S.W.3d 305, 310 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2009, no pet.); In re J.J.O., 131 S.W.3d 618, 630 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2004, no pet.). | 3 | 3 |
Holley v. Adamsgreen2 sentences2025Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367 , 371–72 (Tex. 1976). 2025Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367 , 371–72 (Tex. 1976). | 2 | 7 |
In the Interest of E.R.W.green1 sentence2022Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367, 371-72 (Tex. 1976); In re E.R.W., 528 S.W.3d 251, 266 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2017, no pet.); see also Tex. Fam. | 1 | 1 |
In Re NRTgreen1 sentence2014See In re B.C., No. 07-13-00078-CV, 2013 WL 4624618 , at *3 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Aug. 1, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“A factfinder may consider several factors in finding evidence demonstrated a parent’s inability to provide the child with a safe environment, including the parent’s participation or lack thereof in services, lack of steady housing and employment, and missed opportunities for counseling and a psychological evaluation.”); see J.M. v. Texas Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., No. 03-12-00161-CV, 2012 WL 2476790 , at *6 (Tex. App.—Austin June 26, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.); In re N.R | 1 | 1 |
in the Interest of M.R.J.M., a Childgreen1 sentence2014See In re B.C., No. 07-13-00078-CV, 2013 WL 4624618 , at *3 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Aug. 1, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“A factfinder may consider several factors in finding evidence demonstrated a parent’s inability to provide the child with a safe environment, including the parent’s participation or lack thereof in services, lack of steady housing and employment, and missed opportunities for counseling and a psychological evaluation.”); see J.M. v. Texas Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., No. 03-12-00161-CV, 2012 WL 2476790 , at *6 (Tex. App.—Austin June 26, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.); In re N.R | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.