Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
LMC v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See In re S.J.M., 922 S.W.2d 241, 242 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, no writ) (“Because a juvenile transfer hearing is dispositional, rather than adjudicational in nature, a juvenile court may consider hearsay reports without violating the juvenile's right of confrontation.”); L.M.C. v. State, 861 S.W.2d 541, 542 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, no writ) (“The juvenile court determines probable cause in a nonadversary preliminary hearing. 2023Court noted that “because the transfer hearing is a nonadversary preliminary hearing, the juvenile court may rely upon hearsay as well as written and oral testimony in making its probable-cause findings.” Id. (citing Navarro v. State, No. 01-11-00139-CR, 2012 WL 3776372 , at *5 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 30, 2012 pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication); see also L.M.C. v. State, 861 S.W.2d 541, 542 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, no pet.) (stating transfer hearing is “nonadversary preliminary hearing” and “appellant’s rights will be fully protected when the case r | 3 | 5 |
McKaine v. Stategreen2 sentences2026See, e.g., In re C.P.C., 2025 WL 2956226 , at *2 (“Because a juvenile transfer hearing is dispositional rather than adjudicational in nature, a juvenile court may consider hearsay without violating the juvenile’s right to confrontation.”); In re B.M., 2019 WL 1388561 , at *13 (“[B]ecause the transfer hearing is a nonadversary preliminary hearing, the juvenile court may rely upon hearsay as well as written and oral testimony in making its probable-cause findings.”); In re A.W., 661 S.W.3d at 554 (“[A] juvenile court in a transfer hearing is not required to resolve the admissibility of hearsay e 2026See, e.g., In re C.P.C., 2025 WL 2956226 , at *2 (“Because a juvenile transfer hearing is dispositional rather than adjudicational in nature, a juvenile court may consider hearsay without violating the juvenile’s right to confrontation.”); In re B.M., 2019 WL 1388561 , at *13 (“[B]ecause the transfer hearing is a nonadversary preliminary hearing, the juvenile court may rely upon hearsay as well as written and oral testimony in making its probable-cause findings.”); In re A.W., 661 S.W.3d at 554 (“[A] juvenile court in a transfer hearing is not required to resolve the admissibility of hearsay e | 3 | 3 |
Grant v. Stategreen2 sentences2026See, e.g., In re C.P.C., 2025 WL 2956226 , at *2 (“Because a juvenile transfer hearing is dispositional rather than adjudicational in nature, a juvenile court may consider hearsay without violating the juvenile’s right to confrontation.”); In re B.M., 2019 WL 1388561 , at *13 (“[B]ecause the transfer hearing is a nonadversary preliminary hearing, the juvenile court may rely upon hearsay as well as written and oral testimony in making its probable-cause findings.”); In re A.W., 661 S.W.3d at 554 (“[A] juvenile court in a transfer hearing is not required to resolve the admissibility of hearsay e 2026See, e.g., In re C.P.C., 2025 WL 2956226 , at *2 (“Because a juvenile transfer hearing is dispositional rather than adjudicational in nature, a juvenile court may consider hearsay without violating the juvenile’s right to confrontation.”); In re B.M., 2019 WL 1388561 , at *13 (“[B]ecause the transfer hearing is a nonadversary preliminary hearing, the juvenile court may rely upon hearsay as well as written and oral testimony in making its probable-cause findings.”); In re A.W., 661 S.W.3d at 554 (“[A] juvenile court in a transfer hearing is not required to resolve the admissibility of hearsay e | 3 | 3 |
In re D.W.L.green2 sentences2023The juvenile court may use hearsay as well as written and oral testimony.”) (internal citations omitted); In re D.W.L., 828 S.W.2d 520 , 524–25 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no writ) (“Further, the trial court can determine probable cause in a nonadversary preliminary hearing through the use of hearsay besides written and oral testimony. 2023The juvenile court may use hearsay as well as written and oral testimony.”) (internal citations omitted); In re D.W.L., 828 S.W.2d 520 , 524–25 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no writ) (“Further, the trial court can determine probable cause in a nonadversary preliminary hearing through the use of hearsay besides written and oral testimony. | 2 | 5 |
In Re GBBgreen1 sentence2023See Grant v. State, 313 S.W.3d 443, 444 (Tex. App.—Waco 2010, no pet.) (“[A] juvenile court can determine probable cause in a nonadversary preliminary hearing through the use of hearsay besides written and oral testimony.”); McKaine v. State, 170 S.W.3d 285, 289 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2005, no pet.) (concluding that juvenile court may consider hearsay evidence because “[s]trict rules of evidence are not applied in transfer proceedings.”); In re J.A.W., 976 S.W.2d 260, 264 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, no pet.) (“Section 54.02(e) of the Family Code, which allows the court to consider | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Jawgreen1 sentence2023See Grant v. State, 313 S.W.3d 443, 444 (Tex. App.—Waco 2010, no pet.) (“[A] juvenile court can determine probable cause in a nonadversary preliminary hearing through the use of hearsay besides written and oral testimony.”); McKaine v. State, 170 S.W.3d 285, 289 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2005, no pet.) (concluding that juvenile court may consider hearsay evidence because “[s]trict rules of evidence are not applied in transfer proceedings.”); In re J.A.W., 976 S.W.2d 260, 264 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, no pet.) (“Section 54.02(e) of the Family Code, which allows the court to consider | 1 | 1 |
Matter of SJMgreen2 sentences2023See In re S.J.M., 922 S.W.2d 241, 242 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, no writ) (“Because a juvenile transfer hearing is dispositional, rather than adjudicational in nature, a juvenile court may consider hearsay reports without violating the juvenile's right of confrontation.”); L.M.C. v. State, 861 S.W.2d 541, 542 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, no writ) (“The juvenile court determines probable cause in a nonadversary preliminary hearing. 2023See In re S.J.M., 922 S.W.2d 241, 242 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, no writ) (“Because a juvenile transfer hearing is dispositional, rather than adjudicational in nature, a juvenile court may consider hearsay reports without violating the juvenile's right of confrontation.”); L.M.C. v. State, 861 S.W.2d 541, 542 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, no writ) (“The juvenile court determines probable cause in a nonadversary preliminary hearing. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.