Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2025 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Neil v. Biggersgreen2 sentences2025The “substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification” is measured against five indicia of reliability enumerated in Biggers, 409 U.S. at 198 (the “Biggers factors”). 2024Derri, 199 Wn.2d 658 at 674-75 (citing Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188 , 93 S. Ct. 375 , 34 L. | 1 | 4 |
State v. Vaughngreen2 sentences2021Biggers, 409 U.S. at 199-200 ; see also Vaughn, 101 Wn.2d at 608 . 2021Biggers, 409 U.S. at 199-200 ; see also Vaughn, 101 Wn.2d at 608 . | 1 | 3 |
State v. Vickersgreen2 sentences2021See State v. Vickers, 107 Wn. 2021See State v. Vickers, 107 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Classen
green
2 sentences2025The trial court distinguished its ruling as to the in-court identification 4 State v. Classen, 285 Or. 221, 232 , 590 P.2d 1198 (1979), abrogated on other grounds by State v. Haugen, 361 Or. 284 , 392 P.3d 306 (2017). 18 85952-8/19 explaining that “my exclusion for what [Hood] could do in court was zeroing in on the one person who is sitting at that table, and saying ‘Oh, that’s the guy’. 2025The trial court distinguished its ruling as to the in-court identification 4 State v. Classen, 285 Or. 221, 232 , 590 P.2d 1198 (1979), abrogated on other grounds by State v. Haugen, 361 Or. 284 , 392 P.3d 306 (2017). 18 85952-8/19 explaining that “my exclusion for what [Hood] could do in court was zeroing in on the one person who is sitting at that table, and saying ‘Oh, that’s the guy’. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Haugen
green
2 sentences2025The trial court distinguished its ruling as to the in-court identification 4 State v. Classen, 285 Or. 221, 232 , 590 P.2d 1198 (1979), abrogated on other grounds by State v. Haugen, 361 Or. 284 , 392 P.3d 306 (2017). 18 85952-8/19 explaining that “my exclusion for what [Hood] could do in court was zeroing in on the one person who is sitting at that table, and saying ‘Oh, that’s the guy’. 2025The trial court distinguished its ruling as to the in-court identification 4 State v. Classen, 285 Or. 221, 232 , 590 P.2d 1198 (1979), abrogated on other grounds by State v. Haugen, 361 Or. 284 , 392 P.3d 306 (2017). 18 85952-8/19 explaining that “my exclusion for what [Hood] could do in court was zeroing in on the one person who is sitting at that table, and saying ‘Oh, that’s the guy’. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Henderson
green
2 sentences2023Id. at 686. “‘Estimator variables’ are environmental or individual variables not under the control of the police but ‘equally capable of affecting an eyewitness’ ability to perceive and remember an event.’” Id. at 676 (quoting State v. Henderson, 208 N.J. 208 , 27 A.3d 872 (2011)). 2023Id. at 686. “‘Estimator variables’ are environmental or individual variables not under the control of the police but ‘equally capable of affecting an eyewitness’ ability to perceive and remember an event.’” Id. at 676 (quoting State v. Henderson, 208 N.J. 208 , 27 A.3d 872 (2011)). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Manson v. Brathwaite
green
2 sentences2022Id. at 116 . -8- No. 82321-3-I/9 This court reviews a trial court’s admission of evidence for abuse of discretion. 2022Id. at 116 . -8- No. 82321-3-I/9 This court reviews a trial court’s admission of evidence for abuse of discretion. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Head
green
1 sentence2018Head, 136 Wn.2d at 621-23 . 6 No. 76222-2-1/7 By contrast, here, the oral ruling clearly and comprehensively addressed each of the five Biggers factors. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Gunwall
green
2 sentences2012While Sanchez provided the analysis required by State v. Gunwall, 106 Wn.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986), this case is not an appropriate one to resolve that question. 2012While Sanchez provided the analysis required by State v. Gunwall, 106 Wn.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986), this case is not an appropriate one to resolve that question. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Cook
green
2 sentences2001Cook, 31 Wash.App. at 172 , 639 P.2d 863 (citations omitted). [10] Only after the defendant first shows impermissible suggestiveness does the inquiry turn to whether the identification was nevertheless reliable, using the Biggers factors. 2001Cook, 31 Wash.App. at 172 , 639 P.2d 863 (citations omitted). [10] Only after the defendant first shows impermissible suggestiveness does the inquiry turn to whether the identification was nevertheless reliable, using the Biggers factors. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.