Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Trammellgreen2 sentences2010Instead, we enhanced the reliability analysis by adding the Ramirez factors to the Biggers factors.” 278 Kan. at 270 . 2010Instead, we enhanced the reliability analysis by adding the Ramirez factors to the Biggers factors.” 278 Kan. at 270 . | 1 | 4 |
State v. Ramirezgreen2 sentences2012In Hunt, this court “refined” the Biggers factors by approving criteria recognized by the Utah Supreme Court in State v. Ramirez, 817 P.2d 774, 781 (Utah 1991). 2012In Hunt, this court “refined” the Biggers factors by approving criteria recognized by the Utah Supreme Court in State v. Ramirez, 817 P.2d 774, 781 (Utah 1991). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Neil v. Biggers
green
2 sentences2012These are commonly called the Biggers factors because they derived from the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199-200 , 93 S. Ct. 375 , 34 L. 2012These are commonly called the Biggers factors because they derived from the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199-200 , 93 S. Ct. 375 , 34 L. | 4 | 1992–2012 |
State v. Hunt
green
2 sentences2012Hunt, 275 Kan. at 817-18 . 2010See Trammell, 278 Kan. at 270-71 (Hunt court enhanced reliability analysis by adding Ramirez factors to Biggers factors); Hunt, 275 Kan. at 818 . | 3 | 2010–2012 |
State v. Warren
green
2 sentences2011In State v. Warren, 230 Kan. 385, 397 , 635 P.2d 1236 (1981), the Kansas Supreme *366 Court adopted the Biggers factors. 2011In State v. Warren, 230 Kan. 385, 397 , 635 P.2d 1236 (1981), the Kansas Supreme *366 Court adopted the Biggers factors. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Hernandez
green
2 sentences2011Thus, “[a]s it stands, the only word from the court is that there has been no explicit rejection of the Biggers factors.” State v. Hernandez, 44 Kan. 2011Thus, “[a]s it stands, the only word from the court is that there has been no explicit rejection of the Biggers factors.” State v. Hernandez, 44 Kan. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Lawson
green
2 sentences2000This court determined that the one-person show-up identification was unnecessarily suggestive but upheld the admission of the identification based on the Biggers factors. 25 Kan. 2000This court determined that the one-person show-up identification was unnecessarily suggestive but upheld the admission of the identification based on the Biggers factors. 25 Kan. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Holloman
green
2 sentences2000The Holloman court determined that the one-person identification was unnecessarily suggestive but upheld its admission, finding that the clerk’s identification was reliable based on the Biggers factors. 17 Kan. 2000The Holloman court determined that the one-person identification was unnecessarily suggestive but upheld its admission, finding that the clerk’s identification was reliable based on the Biggers factors. 17 Kan. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Alires
green
1 sentence1992The answer to this question involves consideration of the five Biggers factors set forth in 409 U.S. at 199-200 ; State v. Alires, 246 Kan. at 639 . (1) The opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.