Cook motion (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

Cook motion in Washington

11 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Evans v. Thompsongreen
wash · 1994 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015We deny Cook’s motion. 2 Folsom v. Burger King, 135 Wn.2d 658, 663 , 958 P.2d 301 (1998). 3 Folsom, 135 Wn.2d at 663 . 4 Burns v. City of Seattle, 161 Wn.2d 129, 140 , 164 P.3d 475 (2007). 5 RCW 51.32.010. 6 RCW 51.24.030(1). 7 Evans v. Thompson, 124 Wn.2d 435, 444 , 879 P.2d 938 (1994). 8 RCW 51.08.010 (words used in Title 51 RCW “shall have the meaning given in this chapter’’). 9 Dep’t of Labor & Indus. v. Rowley, 185 Wn.

2015We deny Cook’s motion. 2 Folsom v. Burger King, 135 Wn.2d 658, 663 , 958 P.2d 301 (1998). 3 Folsom, 135 Wn.2d at 663 . 4 Burns v. City of Seattle, 161 Wn.2d 129, 140 , 164 P.3d 475 (2007). 5 RCW 51.32.010. 6 RCW 51.24.030(1). 7 Evans v. Thompson, 124 Wn.2d 435, 444 , 879 P.2d 938 (1994). 8 RCW 51.08.010 (words used in Title 51 RCW “shall have the meaning given in this chapter’’). 9 Dep’t of Labor & Indus. v. Rowley, 185 Wn.

11
Peninsula Sch. Dist. v. Public Sch. Emp.green
wash · 1996 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003However, this conclusion directly contradicts the plain terms of the CBA. [1] For Cook's claim or grievance to be covered by the CBA he must be an "employee." Clerk's Papers (CP) at 59; Majority at 112 An employee is defined in the CBA as "a member of the bargaining unit." Id. at 23.

2003Id. at 413, 924 P.2d 13 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (18)

CaseCitedYears
United States v. Cronic green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

2017A. Claimed Structural Error "An accused's right to be represented by counsel is a fundamental component of our criminal justice system." United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 653 , 104 S. Ct. 2039 , 80 L.

2017A. Claimed Structural Error "An accused's right to be represented by counsel is a fundamental component of our criminal justice system." United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 653 , 104 S. Ct. 2039 , 80 L.

22017–2017
Orris v. Lingley green
washctapp · 2012
2 sentences

2017Thus, the trial court erred by using Entila’s receipt of benefits when determining Cook’s immunity. ¶16 Cook argues that Orris v. Lingley, 172 Wn.

2017App. 61 , 288 P.3d 1159 (2012), supports the proposition that IIA benefits are considered in a determination of immunity.

22017–2017
Berst v. Snohomish County neutral
washctapp · 2002
2 sentences

2009App. 245, 251 , 57 P.3d 273 (2002). ¶9 Here, when considering Mr. Cook’s motion to dismiss under CR 12(b)(6), the trial court considered materials outside of the pleadings.

2009Further, "[i]f ... matters outside the pleading are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in rule 56." CR 12(b); Berst v. Snohomish County, 114 Wash.App. 245, 251 , 57 P.3d 273 (2002). ¶ 9 Here, when considering Mr. Cook's motion to dismiss under CR 12(b)(6), the trial court considered materials outside of the pleadings.

22009–2009
Tenore v. AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES green
wash · 1998
2 sentences

2007Tenore v. AT & T Wireless Servs., 136 Wash.2d 322, 329-30 , 962 P.2d 104 (1998). [2] The record is unclear as to whether there are any other connections between Spokane Freightliner, Inc., and Select Credit & Leasing, L.L.C. [3] It is unlawful for any person, in connection with the offer, sale or purchase of any security, directly or indirectly: (1) To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (2) To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they are mad

2007Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Servs., 136 Wn.2d 322, 329-30 , 962 P.2d 104 (1998).

22007–2007
Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Services green
wash · 1998
2 sentences

2007Tenore v. AT & T Wireless Servs., 136 Wash.2d 322, 329-30 , 962 P.2d 104 (1998). [2] The record is unclear as to whether there are any other connections between Spokane Freightliner, Inc., and Select Credit & Leasing, L.L.C. [3] It is unlawful for any person, in connection with the offer, sale or purchase of any security, directly or indirectly: (1) To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (2) To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they are mad

2007Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Servs., 136 Wn.2d 322, 329-30 , 962 P.2d 104 (1998).

22007–2007
Hamilton v. Department of Labor & Industries green
wash · 1969
2 sentences

2015App. 154, 161 , 340 P.3d 929 (2014) (quoting Dennis v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 109 Wn.2d 467, 470 , 745 P.2d 1295 (1987)), review granted, 183 Wn.2d 1007 (2015). 10 Evans, 124 Wn.2d at 437 (“These legislative declarations mandate policy decisions by the courts which give appropriate recognition to the third party action.’’). 11 In re Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d 355, 362 , 462 P.2d 917 (1969). 12 See Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d at 359-62 . 13 65 Wn.2d 871 , 400 P.2d 305 (1965). 14 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 872 . 15 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 874 . 16 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 17 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 18 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 8

2015App. 154, 161 , 340 P.3d 929 (2014) (quoting Dennis v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 109 Wn.2d 467, 470 , 745 P.2d 1295 (1987)), review granted, 183 Wn.2d 1007 (2015). 10 Evans, 124 Wn.2d at 437 (“These legislative declarations mandate policy decisions by the courts which give appropriate recognition to the third party action.’’). 11 In re Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d 355, 362 , 462 P.2d 917 (1969). 12 See Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d at 359-62 . 13 65 Wn.2d 871 , 400 P.2d 305 (1965). 14 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 872 . 15 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 874 . 16 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 17 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 18 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 8

12015–2015
Folsom v. Burger King green
wash · 1998
2 sentences

2015We deny Cook’s motion. 2 Folsom v. Burger King, 135 Wn.2d 658, 663 , 958 P.2d 301 (1998). 3 Folsom, 135 Wn.2d at 663 . 4 Burns v. City of Seattle, 161 Wn.2d 129, 140 , 164 P.3d 475 (2007). 5 RCW 51.32.010. 6 RCW 51.24.030(1). 7 Evans v. Thompson, 124 Wn.2d 435, 444 , 879 P.2d 938 (1994). 8 RCW 51.08.010 (words used in Title 51 RCW “shall have the meaning given in this chapter’’). 9 Dep’t of Labor & Indus. v. Rowley, 185 Wn.

2015We deny Cook’s motion. 2 Folsom v. Burger King, 135 Wn.2d 658, 663 , 958 P.2d 301 (1998). 3 Folsom, 135 Wn.2d at 663 . 4 Burns v. City of Seattle, 161 Wn.2d 129, 140 , 164 P.3d 475 (2007). 5 RCW 51.32.010. 6 RCW 51.24.030(1). 7 Evans v. Thompson, 124 Wn.2d 435, 444 , 879 P.2d 938 (1994). 8 RCW 51.08.010 (words used in Title 51 RCW “shall have the meaning given in this chapter’’). 9 Dep’t of Labor & Indus. v. Rowley, 185 Wn.

12015–2015
Burns v. City of Seattle green
wash · 2007
1 sentence

2015We deny Cook’s motion. 2 Folsom v. Burger King, 135 Wn.2d 658, 663 , 958 P.2d 301 (1998). 3 Folsom, 135 Wn.2d at 663 . 4 Burns v. City of Seattle, 161 Wn.2d 129, 140 , 164 P.3d 475 (2007). 5 RCW 51.32.010. 6 RCW 51.24.030(1). 7 Evans v. Thompson, 124 Wn.2d 435, 444 , 879 P.2d 938 (1994). 8 RCW 51.08.010 (words used in Title 51 RCW “shall have the meaning given in this chapter’’). 9 Dep’t of Labor & Indus. v. Rowley, 185 Wn.

12015–2015
State v. Speaks neutral
wash · 2015
1 sentence

2015App. 154, 161 , 340 P.3d 929 (2014) (quoting Dennis v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 109 Wn.2d 467, 470 , 745 P.2d 1295 (1987)), review granted, 183 Wn.2d 1007 (2015). 10 Evans, 124 Wn.2d at 437 (“These legislative declarations mandate policy decisions by the courts which give appropriate recognition to the third party action.’’). 11 In re Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d 355, 362 , 462 P.2d 917 (1969). 12 See Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d at 359-62 . 13 65 Wn.2d 871 , 400 P.2d 305 (1965). 14 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 872 . 15 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 874 . 16 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 17 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 18 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 8

12015–2015
Taylor v. Cady green
washctapp · 1977
1 sentence

2015App. 154, 161 , 340 P.3d 929 (2014) (quoting Dennis v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 109 Wn.2d 467, 470 , 745 P.2d 1295 (1987)), review granted, 183 Wn.2d 1007 (2015). 10 Evans, 124 Wn.2d at 437 (“These legislative declarations mandate policy decisions by the courts which give appropriate recognition to the third party action.’’). 11 In re Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d 355, 362 , 462 P.2d 917 (1969). 12 See Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d at 359-62 . 13 65 Wn.2d 871 , 400 P.2d 305 (1965). 14 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 872 . 15 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 874 . 16 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 17 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 18 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 8

12015–2015
Folsom v. Burger King green
wash · 1998
1 sentence

2015We deny Cook’s motion. 2 Folsom v. Burger King, 135 Wn.2d 658, 663 , 958 P.2d 301 (1998). 3 Folsom, 135 Wn.2d at 663 . 4 Burns v. City of Seattle, 161 Wn.2d 129, 140 , 164 P.3d 475 (2007). 5 RCW 51.32.010. 6 RCW 51.24.030(1). 7 Evans v. Thompson, 124 Wn.2d 435, 444 , 879 P.2d 938 (1994). 8 RCW 51.08.010 (words used in Title 51 RCW “shall have the meaning given in this chapter’’). 9 Dep’t of Labor & Indus. v. Rowley, 185 Wn.

12015–2015
Olson v. Stern green
wash · 1965
2 sentences

2015App. 154, 161 , 340 P.3d 929 (2014) (quoting Dennis v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 109 Wn.2d 467, 470 , 745 P.2d 1295 (1987)), review granted, 183 Wn.2d 1007 (2015). 10 Evans, 124 Wn.2d at 437 (“These legislative declarations mandate policy decisions by the courts which give appropriate recognition to the third party action.’’). 11 In re Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d 355, 362 , 462 P.2d 917 (1969). 12 See Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d at 359-62 . 13 65 Wn.2d 871 , 400 P.2d 305 (1965). 14 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 872 . 15 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 874 . 16 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 17 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 18 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 8

2015App. 154, 161 , 340 P.3d 929 (2014) (quoting Dennis v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 109 Wn.2d 467, 470 , 745 P.2d 1295 (1987)), review granted, 183 Wn.2d 1007 (2015). 10 Evans, 124 Wn.2d at 437 (“These legislative declarations mandate policy decisions by the courts which give appropriate recognition to the third party action.’’). 11 In re Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d 355, 362 , 462 P.2d 917 (1969). 12 See Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d at 359-62 . 13 65 Wn.2d 871 , 400 P.2d 305 (1965). 14 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 872 . 15 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 874 . 16 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 17 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 18 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 8

12015–2015
Burns v. City of Seattle green
wash · 2007
1 sentence

2015We deny Cook’s motion. 2 Folsom v. Burger King, 135 Wn.2d 658, 663 , 958 P.2d 301 (1998). 3 Folsom, 135 Wn.2d at 663 . 4 Burns v. City of Seattle, 161 Wn.2d 129, 140 , 164 P.3d 475 (2007). 5 RCW 51.32.010. 6 RCW 51.24.030(1). 7 Evans v. Thompson, 124 Wn.2d 435, 444 , 879 P.2d 938 (1994). 8 RCW 51.08.010 (words used in Title 51 RCW “shall have the meaning given in this chapter’’). 9 Dep’t of Labor & Indus. v. Rowley, 185 Wn.

12015–2015
Department of Labor & Industries v. Rowley green
washctapp · 2014
2 sentences

2015We deny Cook’s motion. 2 Folsom v. Burger King, 135 Wn.2d 658, 663 , 958 P.2d 301 (1998). 3 Folsom, 135 Wn.2d at 663 . 4 Burns v. City of Seattle, 161 Wn.2d 129, 140 , 164 P.3d 475 (2007). 5 RCW 51.32.010. 6 RCW 51.24.030(1). 7 Evans v. Thompson, 124 Wn.2d 435, 444 , 879 P.2d 938 (1994). 8 RCW 51.08.010 (words used in Title 51 RCW “shall have the meaning given in this chapter’’). 9 Dep’t of Labor & Indus. v. Rowley, 185 Wn.

2015App. 154, 161 , 340 P.3d 929 (2014) (quoting Dennis v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 109 Wn.2d 467, 470 , 745 P.2d 1295 (1987)), review granted, 183 Wn.2d 1007 (2015). 10 Evans, 124 Wn.2d at 437 (“These legislative declarations mandate policy decisions by the courts which give appropriate recognition to the third party action.’’). 11 In re Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d 355, 362 , 462 P.2d 917 (1969). 12 See Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d at 359-62 . 13 65 Wn.2d 871 , 400 P.2d 305 (1965). 14 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 872 . 15 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 874 . 16 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 17 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 18 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 8

12015–2015
Dennis v. Department of Labor & Industries green
wash · 1987
2 sentences

2015App. 154, 161 , 340 P.3d 929 (2014) (quoting Dennis v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 109 Wn.2d 467, 470 , 745 P.2d 1295 (1987)), review granted, 183 Wn.2d 1007 (2015). 10 Evans, 124 Wn.2d at 437 (“These legislative declarations mandate policy decisions by the courts which give appropriate recognition to the third party action.’’). 11 In re Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d 355, 362 , 462 P.2d 917 (1969). 12 See Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d at 359-62 . 13 65 Wn.2d 871 , 400 P.2d 305 (1965). 14 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 872 . 15 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 874 . 16 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 17 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 18 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 8

2015App. 154, 161 , 340 P.3d 929 (2014) (quoting Dennis v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 109 Wn.2d 467, 470 , 745 P.2d 1295 (1987)), review granted, 183 Wn.2d 1007 (2015). 10 Evans, 124 Wn.2d at 437 (“These legislative declarations mandate policy decisions by the courts which give appropriate recognition to the third party action.’’). 11 In re Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d 355, 362 , 462 P.2d 917 (1969). 12 See Hamilton, 77 Wn.2d at 359-62 . 13 65 Wn.2d 871 , 400 P.2d 305 (1965). 14 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 872 . 15 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 874 . 16 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 17 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 877 . 18 Olson, 65 Wn.2d at 8

12015–2015
Berst v. Snohomish County green
washctapp · 2002
1 sentence

2009Further, "[i]f ... matters outside the pleading are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in rule 56." CR 12(b); Berst v. Snohomish County, 114 Wash.App. 245, 251 , 57 P.3d 273 (2002). ¶ 9 Here, when considering Mr. Cook's motion to dismiss under CR 12(b)(6), the trial court considered materials outside of the pleadings.

12009–2009
State v. Henshaw green
washctapp · 1991
2 sentences

1992App. 53 , 831 P.2d 165 (1992) (refusing to adopt Cook exception); State v. Henshaw, 62 Wn.

1992App. 135 , 813 P.2d 146 (1991) (holding Cook exception only applied to uncharged misdemeanors).

11992–1992
State v. Martinez green
washctapp · 1992
1 sentence

1992App. 53 , 831 P.2d 165 (1992) (refusing to adopt Cook exception); State v. Henshaw, 62 Wn.

11992–1992

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 21.20.430 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.08.013 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.24.030 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.24.100 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.32.010 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.32.015 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 22 (1973–2025) CA 16 (1980–2026) OH 13 (1992–2025) WA 11 (1992–2017) GA 9 (1989–2023) MO 9 (1985–2016) AL 9 (1983–2017) PA 8 (2019–2025) IL 7 (1990–2025) MS 6 (1998–2019) IN 5 (1980–2018) OR 5 (1999–2016) FL 5 (1982–2004) OK 4 (1987–2021) LA 4 (2014–2019) WY 4 (2000–2015) MA 4 (1963–2012) NY 3 (1991–2022) AR 3 (2016–2023) AK 3 (2002–2013) KS 3 (2006–2024) ID 3 (2007–2020) CO 3 (1914–2024) AZ 3 (1996–2026) DE 3 (2014–2019) MI 2 (1980–1988) ME 2 (1996–2009) WI 2 (2002–2016) UT 2 (2002–2017) SC 2 (1986–2023) IA 2 (2016–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check