Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Smithgreen2 sentences2015Smith, 181 Wn.2d at 520 (stating that “[a] closure unaccompanied by a Bone-Club analysis on the record will almost never be considered justified”). ¶36 Our Supreme Court has recognized that in extremely rare circumstances, a closure could be justified without a Bone-Club analysis if an examination of the record shows that the trial court “effectively weighed the defendant’s public trial right against other compelling interests.” Smith, 181 Wn.2d at 520 . 2015Smith, 181 Wn.2d at 520 (stating that “[a] closure unaccompanied by a Bone-Club analysis on the record will almost never be considered justified”). ¶36 Our Supreme Court has recognized that in extremely rare circumstances, a closure could be justified without a Bone-Club analysis if an examination of the record shows that the trial court “effectively weighed the defendant’s public trial right against other compelling interests.” Smith, 181 Wn.2d at 520 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bone-Club
green
2 sentences2020Discussion Chihuly first argues that the trial court’s reference to the Bone-Club5 factors shows that it focused on the use of Chihuly’s confidential information at 5 State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 258-59 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995) (courts apply and weigh the five Bone-Club factors, which are identical to the Ishikawa factors, when determining whether to close a courtroom). 4 No. 79235-1-I/5 trial, rather than on the relevance of such information to the summary judgment motion. 2020Discussion Chihuly first argues that the trial court’s reference to the Bone-Club5 factors shows that it focused on the use of Chihuly’s confidential information at 5 State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 258-59 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995) (courts apply and weigh the five Bone-Club factors, which are identical to the Ishikawa factors, when determining whether to close a courtroom). 4 No. 79235-1-I/5 trial, rather than on the relevance of such information to the summary judgment motion. | 3 | 2008–2020 |
State v. Wise
green
2 sentences2016Wise, 176 Wn.2d at 10 . 2016Wise, 176 Wn.2d at 10 . | 2 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Sublett
green
2 sentences2014Sublett, 176 Wn.2d at 73 . "5. 2014Sublett, 176 Wn.2d at 73 . | 2 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Brightman
green
2 sentences2011State v. Brightman, 155 Wn.2d 506, 514-15 , 122 P.3d 150 (2005); Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d at 258-60. 2011State v. Brightman, 155 Wn.2d 506, 514-15 , 122 P.3d 150 (2005); Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d at 258-60. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
United States v. Perry, Antoine
green
2 sentences2010Our analysis assumes a closure occurred, but we find that the trial court’s actions here did not implicate Lormor’s public trial right. ¶11 Instructive is United States v. Perry, 375 U.S. App. D.C. 238 , 479 F.3d 885 (2007). 2010Our analysis assumes a closure occurred, but we find that the trial court’s actions here did not implicate Lormor’s public trial right. ¶11 Instructive is United States v. Perry, 375 U.S. App. D.C. 238 , 479 F.3d 885 (2007). | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.