recovery of any claim in Washington

2006They also assert that imposing a shorter statute of limitations on CPA claims is against public policy. ¶ 19 In Simms , an insurance contract included a one-year limitation on any action "`on this policy for the recovery of any claim.'" 27 Wash.App. at 873 , 621 P.2d 155 .

2006They also assert that imposing a shorter statute of limitations on CPA claims is against public policy. ¶19 In Simms , an insurance contract included a one-year limitation on any action “ ‘on this policy for the recovery of any claim.’ ” 27 Wn.

2002The Company shall contribute to the expenses so incurred according to the rate and quantity of the sum herein insured. [31] 97 Wash.App. 201 , 985 P.2d 400 (1999). [32] Id. at 219, 985 P.2d 400 . [33] As counsel acknowledged at oral argument, the sue and labor provision only applies where the insured takes measures to prevent or mitigate a covered loss. [34] The standard form here provides: No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity unless all the requirements of this policy shall have been complied with, and unless commenc

2002The standard form here provides: No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity unless all the requirements of this policy shall have been complied with, and unless commenced within twelve months next after inception of the loss. 711 F. Supp. 1040 (E.D.

2003Wash., 94 Wash. App. 126, 134 , 971 P.2d 545 (1999). [5] CR 56(c); Doolittle, 94 Wash.App. at 134 , 971 P.2d 545 . [6] See RCW 48.17.010 (defining agent); RCW 48.17.020 (defining broker). [7] See, e.g., Hardcastle v. Greenwood Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 9 Wash.App. 884, 887 , 516 P.2d 228 (1973) (insurance agent who undertakes duty of securing insurance is liable to principal for negligent performance of duty). [8] Shows v. Pemberton, 73 Wash.App. 107, 113 , 868 P.2d 164 (1994); Gates v. Logan, 71 Wash. App. 673, 676 , 862 P.2d 134 (1993). [9] See Shows, 73 Wash.App. at 114-15 , 868 P.2d 164 ; Hardt v

2003Wash., 94 Wash. App. 126, 134 , 971 P.2d 545 (1999). [5] CR 56(c); Doolittle, 94 Wash.App. at 134 , 971 P.2d 545 . [6] See RCW 48.17.010 (defining agent); RCW 48.17.020 (defining broker). [7] See, e.g., Hardcastle v. Greenwood Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 9 Wash.App. 884, 887 , 516 P.2d 228 (1973) (insurance agent who undertakes duty of securing insurance is liable to principal for negligent performance of duty). [8] Shows v. Pemberton, 73 Wash.App. 107, 113 , 868 P.2d 164 (1994); Gates v. Logan, 71 Wash. App. 673, 676 , 862 P.2d 134 (1993). [9] See Shows, 73 Wash.App. at 114-15 , 868 P.2d 164 ; Hardt v

2003Wash., 94 Wash. App. 126, 134 , 971 P.2d 545 (1999). [5] CR 56(c); Doolittle, 94 Wash.App. at 134 , 971 P.2d 545 . [6] See RCW 48.17.010 (defining agent); RCW 48.17.020 (defining broker). [7] See, e.g., Hardcastle v. Greenwood Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 9 Wash.App. 884, 887 , 516 P.2d 228 (1973) (insurance agent who undertakes duty of securing insurance is liable to principal for negligent performance of duty). [8] Shows v. Pemberton, 73 Wash.App. 107, 113 , 868 P.2d 164 (1994); Gates v. Logan, 71 Wash. App. 673, 676 , 862 P.2d 134 (1993). [9] See Shows, 73 Wash.App. at 114-15 , 868 P.2d 164 ; Hardt v

2003Wash., 94 Wash. App. 126, 134 , 971 P.2d 545 (1999). [5] CR 56(c); Doolittle, 94 Wash.App. at 134 , 971 P.2d 545 . [6] See RCW 48.17.010 (defining agent); RCW 48.17.020 (defining broker). [7] See, e.g., Hardcastle v. Greenwood Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 9 Wash.App. 884, 887 , 516 P.2d 228 (1973) (insurance agent who undertakes duty of securing insurance is liable to principal for negligent performance of duty). [8] Shows v. Pemberton, 73 Wash.App. 107, 113 , 868 P.2d 164 (1994); Gates v. Logan, 71 Wash. App. 673, 676 , 862 P.2d 134 (1993). [9] See Shows, 73 Wash.App. at 114-15 , 868 P.2d 164 ; Hardt v

2003Wash., 94 Wash. App. 126, 134 , 971 P.2d 545 (1999). [5] CR 56(c); Doolittle, 94 Wash.App. at 134 , 971 P.2d 545 . [6] See RCW 48.17.010 (defining agent); RCW 48.17.020 (defining broker). [7] See, e.g., Hardcastle v. Greenwood Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 9 Wash.App. 884, 887 , 516 P.2d 228 (1973) (insurance agent who undertakes duty of securing insurance is liable to principal for negligent performance of duty). [8] Shows v. Pemberton, 73 Wash.App. 107, 113 , 868 P.2d 164 (1994); Gates v. Logan, 71 Wash. App. 673, 676 , 862 P.2d 134 (1993). [9] See Shows, 73 Wash.App. at 114-15 , 868 P.2d 164 ; Hardt v

2003Wash., 94 Wash. App. 126, 134 , 971 P.2d 545 (1999). [5] CR 56(c); Doolittle, 94 Wash.App. at 134 , 971 P.2d 545 . [6] See RCW 48.17.010 (defining agent); RCW 48.17.020 (defining broker). [7] See, e.g., Hardcastle v. Greenwood Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 9 Wash.App. 884, 887 , 516 P.2d 228 (1973) (insurance agent who undertakes duty of securing insurance is liable to principal for negligent performance of duty). [8] Shows v. Pemberton, 73 Wash.App. 107, 113 , 868 P.2d 164 (1994); Gates v. Logan, 71 Wash. App. 673, 676 , 862 P.2d 134 (1993). [9] See Shows, 73 Wash.App. at 114-15 , 868 P.2d 164 ; Hardt v

2003Wash., 94 Wash. App. 126, 134 , 971 P.2d 545 (1999). [5] CR 56(c); Doolittle, 94 Wash.App. at 134 , 971 P.2d 545 . [6] See RCW 48.17.010 (defining agent); RCW 48.17.020 (defining broker). [7] See, e.g., Hardcastle v. Greenwood Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 9 Wash.App. 884, 887 , 516 P.2d 228 (1973) (insurance agent who undertakes duty of securing insurance is liable to principal for negligent performance of duty). [8] Shows v. Pemberton, 73 Wash.App. 107, 113 , 868 P.2d 164 (1994); Gates v. Logan, 71 Wash. App. 673, 676 , 862 P.2d 134 (1993). [9] See Shows, 73 Wash.App. at 114-15 , 868 P.2d 164 ; Hardt v

2003Wash., 94 Wash. App. 126, 134 , 971 P.2d 545 (1999). [5] CR 56(c); Doolittle, 94 Wash.App. at 134 , 971 P.2d 545 . [6] See RCW 48.17.010 (defining agent); RCW 48.17.020 (defining broker). [7] See, e.g., Hardcastle v. Greenwood Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 9 Wash.App. 884, 887 , 516 P.2d 228 (1973) (insurance agent who undertakes duty of securing insurance is liable to principal for negligent performance of duty). [8] Shows v. Pemberton, 73 Wash.App. 107, 113 , 868 P.2d 164 (1994); Gates v. Logan, 71 Wash. App. 673, 676 , 862 P.2d 134 (1993). [9] See Shows, 73 Wash.App. at 114-15 , 868 P.2d 164 ; Hardt v

2002In contracts of property insurance, or of marine and transportation insurance, such limitation shall not be to a period of less than one year from the date of the loss. [37] RCW 48.18.120(1) authorizes the insurance commissioner to promulgate regulations as necessary to "effect reasonable uniformity in all basic contracts of fire insurance...." [38] WAC 284-20-010(3), promulgated under RCW 48.18.120(1), provides in pertinent part: Except for the provisions of the next succeeding three paragraphs, no company shall issue any basic contract of fire insurance covering property or interest therein

2002In contracts of property insurance, or of marine and transportation insurance, such limitation shall not be to a period of less than one year from the date of the loss. [37] RCW 48.18.120(1) authorizes the insurance commissioner to promulgate regulations as necessary to "effect reasonable uniformity in all basic contracts of fire insurance...." [38] WAC 284-20-010(3), promulgated under RCW 48.18.120(1), provides in pertinent part: Except for the provisions of the next succeeding three paragraphs, no company shall issue any basic contract of fire insurance covering property or interest therein

2002In contracts of property insurance, or of marine and transportation insurance, such limitation shall not be to a period of less than one year from the date of the loss. [37] RCW 48.18.120(1) authorizes the insurance commissioner to promulgate regulations as necessary to "effect reasonable uniformity in all basic contracts of fire insurance...." [38] WAC 284-20-010(3), promulgated under RCW 48.18.120(1), provides in pertinent part: Except for the provisions of the next succeeding three paragraphs, no company shall issue any basic contract of fire insurance covering property or interest therein

2002In contracts of property insurance, or of marine and transportation insurance, such limitation shall not be to a period of less than one year from the date of the loss. [37] RCW 48.18.120(1) authorizes the insurance commissioner to promulgate regulations as necessary to "effect reasonable uniformity in all basic contracts of fire insurance...." [38] WAC 284-20-010(3), promulgated under RCW 48.18.120(1), provides in pertinent part: Except for the provisions of the next succeeding three paragraphs, no company shall issue any basic contract of fire insurance covering property or interest therein

2002In contracts of property insurance, or of marine and transportation insurance, such limitation shall not be to a period of less than one year from the date of the loss. [37] RCW 48.18.120(1) authorizes the insurance commissioner to promulgate regulations as necessary to "effect reasonable uniformity in all basic contracts of fire insurance...." [38] WAC 284-20-010(3), promulgated under RCW 48.18.120(1), provides in pertinent part: Except for the provisions of the next succeeding three paragraphs, no company shall issue any basic contract of fire insurance covering property or interest therein

2002The Company shall contribute to the expenses so incurred according to the rate and quantity of the sum herein insured. [31] 97 Wash.App. 201 , 985 P.2d 400 (1999). [32] Id. at 219, 985 P.2d 400 . [33] As counsel acknowledged at oral argument, the sue and labor provision only applies where the insured takes measures to prevent or mitigate a covered loss. [34] The standard form here provides: No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity unless all the requirements of this policy shall have been complied with, and unless commenc

2002The Company shall contribute to the expenses so incurred according to the rate and quantity of the sum herein insured. [31] 97 Wash.App. 201 , 985 P.2d 400 (1999). [32] Id. at 219, 985 P.2d 400 . [33] As counsel acknowledged at oral argument, the sue and labor provision only applies where the insured takes measures to prevent or mitigate a covered loss. [34] The standard form here provides: No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity unless all the requirements of this policy shall have been complied with, and unless commenc

2002In contracts of property insurance, or of marine and transportation insurance, such limitation shall not be to a period of less than one year from the date of the loss. [37] RCW 48.18.120(1) authorizes the insurance commissioner to promulgate regulations as necessary to "effect reasonable uniformity in all basic contracts of fire insurance...." [38] WAC 284-20-010(3), promulgated under RCW 48.18.120(1), provides in pertinent part: Except for the provisions of the next succeeding three paragraphs, no company shall issue any basic contract of fire insurance covering property or interest therein

2002In contracts of property insurance, or of marine and transportation insurance, such limitation shall not be to a period of less than one year from the date of the loss. [37] RCW 48.18.120(1) authorizes the insurance commissioner to promulgate regulations as necessary to "effect reasonable uniformity in all basic contracts of fire insurance...." [38] WAC 284-20-010(3), promulgated under RCW 48.18.120(1), provides in pertinent part: Except for the provisions of the next succeeding three paragraphs, no company shall issue any basic contract of fire insurance covering property or interest therein

2002In contracts of property insurance, or of marine and transportation insurance, such limitation shall not be to a period of less than one year from the date of the loss. [37] RCW 48.18.120(1) authorizes the insurance commissioner to promulgate regulations as necessary to "effect reasonable uniformity in all basic contracts of fire insurance...." [38] WAC 284-20-010(3), promulgated under RCW 48.18.120(1), provides in pertinent part: Except for the provisions of the next succeeding three paragraphs, no company shall issue any basic contract of fire insurance covering property or interest therein

2002In contracts of property insurance, or of marine and transportation insurance, such limitation shall not be to a period of less than one year from the date of the loss. [37] RCW 48.18.120(1) authorizes the insurance commissioner to promulgate regulations as necessary to "effect reasonable uniformity in all basic contracts of fire insurance...." [38] WAC 284-20-010(3), promulgated under RCW 48.18.120(1), provides in pertinent part: Except for the provisions of the next succeeding three paragraphs, no company shall issue any basic contract of fire insurance covering property or interest therein

2002In contracts of property insurance, or of marine and transportation insurance, such limitation shall not be to a period of less than one year from the date of the loss. [37] RCW 48.18.120(1) authorizes the insurance commissioner to promulgate regulations as necessary to "effect reasonable uniformity in all basic contracts of fire insurance...." [38] WAC 284-20-010(3), promulgated under RCW 48.18.120(1), provides in pertinent part: Except for the provisions of the next succeeding three paragraphs, no company shall issue any basic contract of fire insurance covering property or interest therein

2002The Company shall contribute to the expenses so incurred according to the rate and quantity of the sum herein insured. [31] 97 Wash.App. 201 , 985 P.2d 400 (1999). [32] Id. at 219, 985 P.2d 400 . [33] As counsel acknowledged at oral argument, the sue and labor provision only applies where the insured takes measures to prevent or mitigate a covered loss. [34] The standard form here provides: No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity unless all the requirements of this policy shall have been complied with, and unless commenc

2002In contracts of property insurance, or of marine and transportation insurance, such limitation shall not be to a period of less than one year from the date of the loss. [37] RCW 48.18.120(1) authorizes the insurance commissioner to promulgate regulations as necessary to "effect reasonable uniformity in all basic contracts of fire insurance...." [38] WAC 284-20-010(3), promulgated under RCW 48.18.120(1), provides in pertinent part: Except for the provisions of the next succeeding three paragraphs, no company shall issue any basic contract of fire insurance covering property or interest therein

2002In contracts of property insurance, or of marine and transportation insurance, such limitation shall not be to a period of less than one year from the date of the loss. [37] RCW 48.18.120(1) authorizes the insurance commissioner to promulgate regulations as necessary to "effect reasonable uniformity in all basic contracts of fire insurance...." [38] WAC 284-20-010(3), promulgated under RCW 48.18.120(1), provides in pertinent part: Except for the provisions of the next succeeding three paragraphs, no company shall issue any basic contract of fire insurance covering property or interest therein

2002In contracts of property insurance, or of marine and transportation insurance, such limitation shall not be to a period of less than one year from the date of the loss. [37] RCW 48.18.120(1) authorizes the insurance commissioner to promulgate regulations as necessary to "effect reasonable uniformity in all basic contracts of fire insurance...." [38] WAC 284-20-010(3), promulgated under RCW 48.18.120(1), provides in pertinent part: Except for the provisions of the next succeeding three paragraphs, no company shall issue any basic contract of fire insurance covering property or interest therein

1923Staats v. Pioneer Insurance Association, 55 Wash. 51 , 104 Pac. 185 , and cases cited therein, which case and others are cited and relied on in Shaw Supply Co. v. Nelson Co., 124 Wash. 305 , 214 Pac. 19 .

1923Staats v. Pioneer Insurance Association, 55 Wash. 51 , 104 Pac. 185 , and cases cited therein, which case and others are cited and relied on in Shaw Supply Co. v. Nelson Co., 124 Wash. 305 , 214 Pac. 19 .

1923Staats v. Pioneer Insurance Association, 55 Wash. 51 , 104 Pac. 185 , and cases cited therein, which case and others are cited and relied on in Shaw Supply Co. v. Nelson Co., 124 Wash. 305 , 214 Pac. 19 .

1923Staats v. Pioneer Insurance Association, 55 Wash. 51 , 104 Pac. 185 , and cases cited therein, which case and others are cited and relied on in Shaw Supply Co. v. Nelson Co., 124 Wash. 305 , 214 Pac. 19 .

1910Fire Ass’n, 48 Wash. 50 , 92 Pac. 881 , this court held that the making of proofs of loss by an assured within the time required by the policy was a condition precedent to maintaining an action; but the policy in that case, upon its face, expressly stipulated that proofs of loss must be made to the company “within sixty days after the fire, unless such time is extended in writing by this company,” and also that “no suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity until after full compliance by the assured with all the foregoing agre

1910Fire Ass’n, 48 Wash. 50 , 92 Pac. 881 , this court held that the making of proofs of loss by an assured within the time required by the policy was a condition precedent to maintaining an action; but the policy in that case, upon its face, expressly stipulated that proofs of loss must be made to the company “within sixty days after the fire, unless such time is extended in writing by this company,” and also that “no suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity until after full compliance by the assured with all the foregoing agre

1910Co. v. Stone, 58 Wash. 661 , 109 Pac. 112 , it was contended that the words, “This assignment is hereby accepted and approved,” appearing upon the back of a contract of sale, but not referred to in the body thereof, should be regarded as a part of the agreement, and that written approval by the vendor became necessary to the validity of an assignment.

1910Co. v. Stone, 58 Wash. 661 , 109 Pac. 112 , it was contended that the words, “This assignment is hereby accepted and approved,” appearing upon the back of a contract of sale, but not referred to in the body thereof, should be regarded as a part of the agreement, and that written approval by the vendor became necessary to the validity of an assignment.