Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
6 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1893–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Union Automobile Indemnity Association v. Harry v. Shields, as Natural Father and Custodial Parent of Dana Anne Shields, a Deceased Minorgreen1 sentence2005Ass'n v. Shields, 79 F.3d at 40 (noting that the insured did not give notice *1117 of the accident to its insurer until after the contractual limitation period, as explicitly measured from the date of the loss, had expired). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Statesman Insurance v. Reibly
green
2 sentences1983Generally, such limitation periods, while not favored in the law, Huff v. Travelers Indemnity Co., (1977) 266 Ind. 414, 423 , 363 N.E.2d 985, 991 ; Statesman Insurance Co. v. Reibly, (1978) 175 Ind.App. 317, 320 , 371 N.E.2d 414, 416 , trans. denied, are nevertheless enforceable. 1983Generally, such limitation periods, while not favored in the law, Huff v. Travelers Indemnity Co., (1977) 266 Ind. 414, 423 , 363 N.E.2d 985, 991 ; Statesman Insurance Co. v. Reibly, (1978) 175 Ind.App. 317, 320 , 371 N.E.2d 414, 416 , trans. denied, are nevertheless enforceable. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Huff v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
green
2 sentences1983Generally, such limitation periods, while not favored in the law, Huff v. Travelers Indemnity Co., (1977) 266 Ind. 414, 423 , 363 N.E.2d 985, 991 ; Statesman Insurance Co. v. Reibly, (1978) 175 Ind.App. 317, 320 , 371 N.E.2d 414, 416 , trans. denied, are nevertheless enforceable. 1983Generally, such limitation periods, while not favored in the law, Huff v. Travelers Indemnity Co., (1977) 266 Ind. 414, 423 , 363 N.E.2d 985, 991 ; Statesman Insurance Co. v. Reibly, (1978) 175 Ind.App. 317, 320 , 371 N.E.2d 414, 416 , trans. denied, are nevertheless enforceable. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Heitman, Rec. v. Scales
green
1 sentence1942Price v. Engle (1922), 77 Ind. App. 439 , 133 N. E. 755 ; Williams v. Williams, Admr. (1940), 217 Ind. 581 , 29 N. E. (2d) 557; Bahr, Superintendent v. Zahm (1941), 219 Ind. 297 , 37 N. E. (2d) 942; Heitman, Rec. v. Seales (1942), 111 Ind. App. 68 , 38 N. E. (2d) 890. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Bahr, Superintendent v. Zahm
green
1 sentence1942Price v. Engle (1922), 77 Ind. App. 439 , 133 N. E. 755 ; Williams v. Williams, Admr. (1940), 217 Ind. 581 , 29 N. E. (2d) 557; Bahr, Superintendent v. Zahm (1941), 219 Ind. 297 , 37 N. E. (2d) 942; Heitman, Rec. v. Seales (1942), 111 Ind. App. 68 , 38 N. E. (2d) 890. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Williams v. Williams, Admr.
green
1 sentence1942Price v. Engle (1922), 77 Ind. App. 439 , 133 N. E. 755 ; Williams v. Williams, Admr. (1940), 217 Ind. 581 , 29 N. E. (2d) 557; Bahr, Superintendent v. Zahm (1941), 219 Ind. 297 , 37 N. E. (2d) 942; Heitman, Rec. v. Seales (1942), 111 Ind. App. 68 , 38 N. E. (2d) 890. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Price v. Engle
neutral
2 sentences1942Price v. Engle (1922), 77 Ind. App. 439 , 133 N. E. 755 ; Williams v. Williams, Admr. (1940), 217 Ind. 581 , 29 N. E. (2d) 557; Bahr, Superintendent v. Zahm (1941), 219 Ind. 297 , 37 N. E. (2d) 942; Heitman, Rec. v. Seales (1942), 111 Ind. App. 68 , 38 N. E. (2d) 890. 1942Price v. Engle (1922), 77 Ind. App. 439 , 133 N. E. 755 ; Williams v. Williams, Admr. (1940), 217 Ind. 581 , 29 N. E. (2d) 557; Bahr, Superintendent v. Zahm (1941), 219 Ind. 297 , 37 N. E. (2d) 942; Heitman, Rec. v. Seales (1942), 111 Ind. App. 68 , 38 N. E. (2d) 890. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Pennsylvania Co. v. Clark
neutral
1 sentence1906Pennsylvania Co. v. Clark (1891), 2 Ind. App. 146 . | 1 | 1906–1906 |
State ex rel. Young v. Cunningham
neutral
1 sentence1893Section 385, Elliott’s Supp.; Pearson v. Pearson, 125 Ind. 341 (349); State, ex rel., v. Cunningham, Exec., 101 Ind. 461 . | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Pearson v. Pearson
neutral
1 sentence1893Section 385, Elliott’s Supp.; Pearson v. Pearson, 125 Ind. 341 (349); State, ex rel., v. Cunningham, Exec., 101 Ind. 461 . | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Henes v. Henes
neutral
1 sentence1893The case in hand is not analogous to the case of Henes, Admr., v. Henes, supra, and, strictly speaking, this is not an action ‘ ‘for the recovery of any claim against the decedent” within the purview of section 385, supra. The decedent, at her death, was not indebted to appellee. | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.