Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2025 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Franks v. Delawaregreen2 sentences2025See Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155-56 (1978) (recognizing challenge to search warrant on claim that the warrant application included a false statement that was made deliberately or with reckless disregard for the truth, where the statement was necessary to finding of probable cause); see also State v. Mann, 123 Wis. 2d 375, 388 , 367 N.W.2d 209 (1985) (“[A]n omitted fact [is] the equivalent of ‘a deliberate falsehood or a reckless disregard for the truth’” if it is “an undisputed fact that is critical to an impartial judge’s fair determination of probable cause.” (citation omitted)). 2023See supra ¶¶19-26. 8 Because we review the circuit court’s denial of Schye’s Franks/Mann motion de novo, we need not address his argument that the court incorrectly applied deference to the warrant-issuing judge in denying the motion. 17 No. 2021AP2094-CR ¶37 Even if one or more of the images did not depict child pornography, “the allegedly false statement[s were not] necessary to the finding of probable cause.” See Franks, 438 U.S. at 156 . | 7 | 8 |
State v. Manngreen2 sentences2025In Mann, 123 Wis. 2d at 385-90 , our supreme court extended the Franks rule “to include omissions from a warrant affidavit if the omissions are the equivalent of deliberate falsehoods or reckless disregard for the truth.” State v. Jones, 2002 WI App 196, ¶25 , 257 Wis. 2d 319 , 651 N.W.2d 305 . 5 No. 2024AP776-CR ¶11 Following a Franks/Mann hearing, the circuit court first must determine whether the defendant met the defendant’s burden of proving the existence of false statements or material omissions in the warrant affidavit by a preponderance of the evidence. 2025Id. at 387 . ¶12 At the close of the Franks/Mann hearing in this case, the circuit court determined, at least implicitly, that Harkness had met his burden of showing that the warrant affidavit contained a false statement. | 6 | 9 |
State v. Wardgreen2 sentences2025See State v. Ward, 2000 WI 3, ¶¶23, 27 , 231 Wis. 2d 723 , 604 N.W.2d 517 . ¶9 Here, Shock brought a Franks/Mann challenge to the validity of the search warrant. 2025See State v. Ward, 2000 WI 3, ¶¶23, 27 , 231 Wis. 2d 723 , 604 N.W.2d 517 . ¶9 Here, Shock brought a Franks/Mann challenge to the validity of the search warrant. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Patrick I. Hogangreen2 sentences2023See State v. Hogan, 2015 WI 76, ¶32 , 364 Wis. 2d 167 , 868 N.W.2d 124 . ¶36 Here, it is unclear under which prong of the Franks/Mann test the circuit court denied Schye’s motion. 2023See State v. Hogan, 2015 WI 76, ¶32 , 364 Wis. 2d 167 , 868 N.W.2d 124 . ¶36 Here, it is unclear under which prong of the Franks/Mann test the circuit court denied Schye’s motion. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Caniglia v. Strom
green
1 sentence2025As to the motion to dismiss for lack of probable cause, the court concluded that the officers’ “community caretaker function” was “validly executed in this case.” The court also rejected Wilkie’s Franks/Mann motion, stating that “[e]ven with that additional information [from the recording], which simply goes toward perhaps subjective beliefs of the officer,” that information would not “change the analysis regarding the community caretaker function.” ¶10 Months later, Wilkie moved the circuit court for reconsideration pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Caniglia v. Strom, | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Jones
green
2 sentences2025In Mann, 123 Wis. 2d at 385-90 , our supreme court extended the Franks rule “to include omissions from a warrant affidavit if the omissions are the equivalent of deliberate falsehoods or reckless disregard for the truth.” State v. Jones, 2002 WI App 196, ¶25 , 257 Wis. 2d 319 , 651 N.W.2d 305 . 5 No. 2024AP776-CR ¶11 Following a Franks/Mann hearing, the circuit court first must determine whether the defendant met the defendant’s burden of proving the existence of false statements or material omissions in the warrant affidavit by a preponderance of the evidence. 2025In Mann, 123 Wis. 2d at 385-90 , our supreme court extended the Franks rule “to include omissions from a warrant affidavit if the omissions are the equivalent of deliberate falsehoods or reckless disregard for the truth.” State v. Jones, 2002 WI App 196, ¶25 , 257 Wis. 2d 319 , 651 N.W.2d 305 . 5 No. 2024AP776-CR ¶11 Following a Franks/Mann hearing, the circuit court first must determine whether the defendant met the defendant’s burden of proving the existence of false statements or material omissions in the warrant affidavit by a preponderance of the evidence. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Romero
green
2 sentences2023A search warrant is supported by probable cause if the warrant-issuing judge “had a substantial basis for concluding that there was a fair probability that a search of the specified premises would uncover evidence of wrongdoing.” State v. Romero, 2009 WI 32, ¶3 , 317 Wis. 2d 12 , 765 N.W.2d 756 . ¶15 Here, Lewis brought a Franks/Mann challenge to the validity of the search warrant. 2023A search warrant is supported by probable cause if the warrant-issuing judge “had a substantial basis for concluding that there was a fair probability that a search of the specified premises would uncover evidence of wrongdoing.” State v. Romero, 2009 WI 32, ¶3 , 317 Wis. 2d 12 , 765 N.W.2d 756 . ¶15 Here, Lewis brought a Franks/Mann challenge to the validity of the search warrant. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Manuel
green
2 sentences2023State v. Manuel, 213 Wis. 2d 308, 315 , 570 N.W.2d 601 (Ct. App. 1997). 2023State v. Manuel, 213 Wis. 2d 308, 315 , 570 N.W.2d 601 (Ct. App. 1997). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Nathan Mann v. United States
green
2 sentences1980In Mann v. United States, 319 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 986 (1964), the following instruction, now known as the Mann instruction, was given: “It is reasonable to infer that a person ordinarily intends the natural and probable consequences of acts knowingly done or knowingly omitted. 1980In Mann v. United States, 319 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 986 (1964), the following instruction, now known as the Mann instruction, was given: “It is reasonable to infer that a person ordinarily intends the natural and probable consequences of acts knowingly done or knowingly omitted. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Clark v. Washington State Bar Ass'n
green
2 sentences1980In Mann v. United States, 319 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 986 (1964), the following instruction, now known as the Mann instruction, was given: “It is reasonable to infer that a person ordinarily intends the natural and probable consequences of acts knowingly done or knowingly omitted. 1980In Mann v. United States, 319 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 986 (1964), the following instruction, now known as the Mann instruction, was given: “It is reasonable to infer that a person ordinarily intends the natural and probable consequences of acts knowingly done or knowingly omitted. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.