pleaded defense in California

10 California opinions name it 3 courts 1929–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (12)

Case	Followed	Cited
Castle v. Castlegreen calctapp · 1945 · cited in 2 California opinions naming this issue, 1967–1967 2 sentences 1967(See Jurczyk v. Jurczyk, 232 Cal.App.2d 270, 271 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 660 ] ; Castle v. Castle, 71 Cal.App.2d 323, 324-325 [ 162 P.2d 656 ].) This would also be true of the pleaded defense of laches. 1967(See Jurczyk v. Jurczyk, 232 Cal.App.2d 270, 271 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 660 ] ; Castle v. Castle, 71 Cal.App.2d 323, 324-325 [ 162 P.2d 656 ].) This would also be true of the pleaded defense of laches.	2	2
Jurczyk v. Jurczykgreen calctapp · 1965 · cited in 2 California opinions naming this issue, 1967–1967 2 sentences 1967(See Jurczyk v. Jurczyk, 232 Cal.App.2d 270, 271 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 660 ] ; Castle v. Castle, 71 Cal.App.2d 323, 324-325 [ 162 P.2d 656 ].) This would also be true of the pleaded defense of laches. 1967(See Jurczyk v. Jurczyk, 232 Cal.App.2d 270, 271 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 660 ] ; Castle v. Castle, 71 Cal.App.2d 323, 324-325 [ 162 P.2d 656 ].) This would also be true of the pleaded defense of laches.	2	2
Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc.green cal · 2019 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023 1 sentence 2023Joseph Health System (2021) 11 Cal.5th 995 , 1010 (Bonni).) As applied in Bonni and other cases (see Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc. (2019) 7 Cal.5th 871, 884, 898 ; Park v. Board of Trustees of California State University (2017) 2 Cal.5th 1057 , 1062–1063), this analysis focuses factually on specific “acts,” “activities,” or “conduct” that make up the elements of a pleaded claim.	1	1
Green v. Superior Courtgreen cal · 1974 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1974–1974 2 sentences 1974Proc. § 117c; Green v. Superior Court (1974) 10 Cal.3d 616, 632-634 [ 111 Cal.Rptr. 704 , 517 P.2d 1168 ].) In the Appel case the trial court erroneously concluded that the facts did not establish the pleaded defense. 1974Proc. § 117c; Green v. Superior Court (1974) 10 Cal.3d 616, 632-634 [ 111 Cal.Rptr. 704 , 517 P.2d 1168 ].) In the Appel case the trial court erroneously concluded that the facts did not establish the pleaded defense.	1	1
Ellis v. Community Chevrolet, Inc.green calctapp · 1966 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1967–1967 2 sentences 1967(Ellis v. Community Chevrolet, Inc., 242 Cal.App.2d 79, 81 [ 51 Cal.Rptr. 154 ]; Spindler Realty Corp. v. Monning, 243 Cal.App.2d 255, 275-276 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 7 ], cert. den. 385 U.S. 975 [ 17 L.Ed.2d 437 , 87 S.Ct. 515 ]; Auer v. Frank, 227 Cal.App.2d 396, 406 [ 38 Cal.Rptr. 684 , 8 A.L.R.3d 1108 ].) Nevertheless application of the implied finding rule requires findings as to all material facts necessary to support the judgment. 1967(Ellis v. Community Chevrolet, Inc., 242 Cal.App.2d 79, 81 [ 51 Cal.Rptr. 154 ]; Spindler Realty Corp. v. Monning, 243 Cal.App.2d 255, 275-276 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 7 ], cert. den. 385 U.S. 975 [ 17 L.Ed.2d 437 , 87 S.Ct. 515 ]; Auer v. Frank, 227 Cal.App.2d 396, 406 [ 38 Cal.Rptr. 684 , 8 A.L.R.3d 1108 ].) Nevertheless application of the implied finding rule requires findings as to all material facts necessary to support the judgment.	1	1
Spindler Realty Corp. v. Monninggreen calctapp · 1966 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1967–1967 2 sentences 1967(Ellis v. Community Chevrolet, Inc., 242 Cal.App.2d 79, 81 [ 51 Cal.Rptr. 154 ]; Spindler Realty Corp. v. Monning, 243 Cal.App.2d 255, 275-276 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 7 ], cert. den. 385 U.S. 975 [ 17 L.Ed.2d 437 , 87 S.Ct. 515 ]; Auer v. Frank, 227 Cal.App.2d 396, 406 [ 38 Cal.Rptr. 684 , 8 A.L.R.3d 1108 ].) Nevertheless application of the implied finding rule requires findings as to all material facts necessary to support the judgment. 1967(Ellis v. Community Chevrolet, Inc., 242 Cal.App.2d 79, 81 [ 51 Cal.Rptr. 154 ]; Spindler Realty Corp. v. Monning, 243 Cal.App.2d 255, 275-276 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 7 ], cert. den. 385 U.S. 975 [ 17 L.Ed.2d 437 , 87 S.Ct. 515 ]; Auer v. Frank, 227 Cal.App.2d 396, 406 [ 38 Cal.Rptr. 684 , 8 A.L.R.3d 1108 ].) Nevertheless application of the implied finding rule requires findings as to all material facts necessary to support the judgment.	1	1
Auer v. Frankgreen calctapp · 1964 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1967–1967 2 sentences 1967(Ellis v. Community Chevrolet, Inc., 242 Cal.App.2d 79, 81 [ 51 Cal.Rptr. 154 ]; Spindler Realty Corp. v. Monning, 243 Cal.App.2d 255, 275-276 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 7 ], cert. den. 385 U.S. 975 [ 17 L.Ed.2d 437 , 87 S.Ct. 515 ]; Auer v. Frank, 227 Cal.App.2d 396, 406 [ 38 Cal.Rptr. 684 , 8 A.L.R.3d 1108 ].) Nevertheless application of the implied finding rule requires findings as to all material facts necessary to support the judgment. 1967(Ellis v. Community Chevrolet, Inc., 242 Cal.App.2d 79, 81 [ 51 Cal.Rptr. 154 ]; Spindler Realty Corp. v. Monning, 243 Cal.App.2d 255, 275-276 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 7 ], cert. den. 385 U.S. 975 [ 17 L.Ed.2d 437 , 87 S.Ct. 515 ]; Auer v. Frank, 227 Cal.App.2d 396, 406 [ 38 Cal.Rptr. 684 , 8 A.L.R.3d 1108 ].) Nevertheless application of the implied finding rule requires findings as to all material facts necessary to support the judgment.	1	1
McGee v. City of San Josegreen cal · 1885 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1944–1944 2 sentences 1944(McGee v. City of San Jose (1885), 68 Cal. 91, 94 [ 8 P. 641 ]; Huddleston v. Washington (1902), 136 Cal. 514, 519 [ 69 P. 146 ]; McGlew v. McDade (1905), 146 Cal. 553, 554 [ 80 P. 695 ]; Stanley v. Westover (1928), 93 Cal.App. 97, 111 [ 269 P. 468 ]; Pendergrass v. Axx (1931), 111 Cal.App. 478, 481 [ 295 P. 896 ].) It should also be noted that the above quoted instruction ignores completely the pleaded defense of the statute of limitations. 1944(McGee v. City of San Jose (1885), 68 Cal. 91, 94 [ 8 P. 641 ]; Huddleston v. Washington (1902), 136 Cal. 514, 519 [ 69 P. 146 ]; McGlew v. McDade (1905), 146 Cal. 553, 554 [ 80 P. 695 ]; Stanley v. Westover (1928), 93 Cal.App. 97, 111 [ 269 P. 468 ]; Pendergrass v. Axx (1931), 111 Cal.App. 478, 481 [ 295 P. 896 ].) It should also be noted that the above quoted instruction ignores completely the pleaded defense of the statute of limitations.	1	1
Stanley v. Westovergreen calctapp · 1928 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1944–1944 2 sentences 1944(McGee v. City of San Jose (1885), 68 Cal. 91, 94 [ 8 P. 641 ]; Huddleston v. Washington (1902), 136 Cal. 514, 519 [ 69 P. 146 ]; McGlew v. McDade (1905), 146 Cal. 553, 554 [ 80 P. 695 ]; Stanley v. Westover (1928), 93 Cal.App. 97, 111 [ 269 P. 468 ]; Pendergrass v. Axx (1931), 111 Cal.App. 478, 481 [ 295 P. 896 ].) It should also be noted that the above quoted instruction ignores completely the pleaded defense of the statute of limitations. 1944(McGee v. City of San Jose (1885), 68 Cal. 91, 94 [ 8 P. 641 ]; Huddleston v. Washington (1902), 136 Cal. 514, 519 [ 69 P. 146 ]; McGlew v. McDade (1905), 146 Cal. 553, 554 [ 80 P. 695 ]; Stanley v. Westover (1928), 93 Cal.App. 97, 111 [ 269 P. 468 ]; Pendergrass v. Axx (1931), 111 Cal.App. 478, 481 [ 295 P. 896 ].) It should also be noted that the above quoted instruction ignores completely the pleaded defense of the statute of limitations.	1	1
Pendergrass v. Axxgreen calctapp · 1931 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1944–1944 2 sentences 1944(McGee v. City of San Jose (1885), 68 Cal. 91, 94 [ 8 P. 641 ]; Huddleston v. Washington (1902), 136 Cal. 514, 519 [ 69 P. 146 ]; McGlew v. McDade (1905), 146 Cal. 553, 554 [ 80 P. 695 ]; Stanley v. Westover (1928), 93 Cal.App. 97, 111 [ 269 P. 468 ]; Pendergrass v. Axx (1931), 111 Cal.App. 478, 481 [ 295 P. 896 ].) It should also be noted that the above quoted instruction ignores completely the pleaded defense of the statute of limitations. 1944(McGee v. City of San Jose (1885), 68 Cal. 91, 94 [ 8 P. 641 ]; Huddleston v. Washington (1902), 136 Cal. 514, 519 [ 69 P. 146 ]; McGlew v. McDade (1905), 146 Cal. 553, 554 [ 80 P. 695 ]; Stanley v. Westover (1928), 93 Cal.App. 97, 111 [ 269 P. 468 ]; Pendergrass v. Axx (1931), 111 Cal.App. 478, 481 [ 295 P. 896 ].) It should also be noted that the above quoted instruction ignores completely the pleaded defense of the statute of limitations.	1	1
McGlew v. McDadegreen cal · 1905 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1944–1944 2 sentences 1944(McGee v. City of San Jose (1885), 68 Cal. 91, 94 [ 8 P. 641 ]; Huddleston v. Washington (1902), 136 Cal. 514, 519 [ 69 P. 146 ]; McGlew v. McDade (1905), 146 Cal. 553, 554 [ 80 P. 695 ]; Stanley v. Westover (1928), 93 Cal.App. 97, 111 [ 269 P. 468 ]; Pendergrass v. Axx (1931), 111 Cal.App. 478, 481 [ 295 P. 896 ].) It should also be noted that the above quoted instruction ignores completely the pleaded defense of the statute of limitations. 1944(McGee v. City of San Jose (1885), 68 Cal. 91, 94 [ 8 P. 641 ]; Huddleston v. Washington (1902), 136 Cal. 514, 519 [ 69 P. 146 ]; McGlew v. McDade (1905), 146 Cal. 553, 554 [ 80 P. 695 ]; Stanley v. Westover (1928), 93 Cal.App. 97, 111 [ 269 P. 468 ]; Pendergrass v. Axx (1931), 111 Cal.App. 478, 481 [ 295 P. 896 ].) It should also be noted that the above quoted instruction ignores completely the pleaded defense of the statute of limitations.	1	1
Huddleston v. Washingtongreen cal · 1902 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1944–1944 2 sentences 1944(McGee v. City of San Jose (1885), 68 Cal. 91, 94 [ 8 P. 641 ]; Huddleston v. Washington (1902), 136 Cal. 514, 519 [ 69 P. 146 ]; McGlew v. McDade (1905), 146 Cal. 553, 554 [ 80 P. 695 ]; Stanley v. Westover (1928), 93 Cal.App. 97, 111 [ 269 P. 468 ]; Pendergrass v. Axx (1931), 111 Cal.App. 478, 481 [ 295 P. 896 ].) It should also be noted that the above quoted instruction ignores completely the pleaded defense of the statute of limitations. 1944(McGee v. City of San Jose (1885), 68 Cal. 91, 94 [ 8 P. 641 ]; Huddleston v. Washington (1902), 136 Cal. 514, 519 [ 69 P. 146 ]; McGlew v. McDade (1905), 146 Cal. 553, 554 [ 80 P. 695 ]; Stanley v. Westover (1928), 93 Cal.App. 97, 111 [ 269 P. 468 ]; Pendergrass v. Axx (1931), 111 Cal.App. 478, 481 [ 295 P. 896 ].) It should also be noted that the above quoted instruction ignores completely the pleaded defense of the statute of limitations.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

Case	Cited	Years
Park v. Bd. of Trs. of the Cal. State Univ. green cal · 2017 1 sentence 2023Joseph Health System (2021) 11 Cal.5th 995 , 1010 (Bonni).) As applied in Bonni and other cases (see Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc. (2019) 7 Cal.5th 871, 884, 898 ; Park v. Board of Trustees of California State University (2017) 2 Cal.5th 1057 , 1062–1063), this analysis focuses factually on specific “acts,” “activities,” or “conduct” that make up the elements of a pleaded claim.	1	2023–2023
Sunset Drive Corp. v. City of Redlands green calctapp · 1999 1 sentence 2009It is the failure to perform the latter duty which forms the basis for Sunset’s damage claim.” (Sunset Drive, supra, 73 Cal.App.4th 215, 225 .) “[Rjegardless of whether a duty is deemed to be mandatory or directory, the agency is required to perform it.	1	2009–2009
Marks v. Whitney green cal · 1971 2 sentences 1972Thus, as a result of the decision in Marks v. Whitney, 6 Cal.3d 251 [ 98 Cal.Rptr. 790 , 491 P.2d 374 ], plaintiffs tacitly concede the tidelands in question were subject to- a public trust for commerce, navigation and fisheries. 2 The trial court held in favor of the pleaded defense of laches based upon findings of extensive improvements and outlays of public moneys since State in 1925, under legislative authority, conveyed to Chula Vista certain tidelands along the east side of San Diego Bay including the property in question, subject to public trusts for purposes of commerce, navigation and 1972Thus, as a result of the decision in Marks v. Whitney, 6 Cal.3d 251 [ 98 Cal.Rptr. 790 , 491 P.2d 374 ], plaintiffs tacitly concede the tidelands in question were subject to- a public trust for commerce, navigation and fisheries. 2 The trial court held in favor of the pleaded defense of laches based upon findings of extensive improvements and outlays of public moneys since State in 1925, under legislative authority, conveyed to Chula Vista certain tidelands along the east side of San Diego Bay including the property in question, subject to public trusts for purposes of commerce, navigation and	1	1972–1972
J. C. Penney Co. v. Marston neutral scotus · 1966 1 sentence 1967(Ellis v. Community Chevrolet, Inc., 242 Cal.App.2d 79, 81 [ 51 Cal.Rptr. 154 ]; Spindler Realty Corp. v. Monning, 243 Cal.App.2d 255, 275-276 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 7 ], cert. den. 385 U.S. 975 [ 17 L.Ed.2d 437 , 87 S.Ct. 515 ]; Auer v. Frank, 227 Cal.App.2d 396, 406 [ 38 Cal.Rptr. 684 , 8 A.L.R.3d 1108 ].) Nevertheless application of the implied finding rule requires findings as to all material facts necessary to support the judgment.	1	1967–1967
Spindler Realty Corp. v. Monning green scotus · 1966 1 sentence 1967(Ellis v. Community Chevrolet, Inc., 242 Cal.App.2d 79, 81 [ 51 Cal.Rptr. 154 ]; Spindler Realty Corp. v. Monning, 243 Cal.App.2d 255, 275-276 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 7 ], cert. den. 385 U.S. 975 [ 17 L.Ed.2d 437 , 87 S.Ct. 515 ]; Auer v. Frank, 227 Cal.App.2d 396, 406 [ 38 Cal.Rptr. 684 , 8 A.L.R.3d 1108 ].) Nevertheless application of the implied finding rule requires findings as to all material facts necessary to support the judgment.	1	1967–1967
Hickman v. London Assurance Corp. green cal · 1920 2 sentences 1962The standard policy provision requiring production of records and submission to examination is valid, and compliance with it is a condition to recovery on the policy (Hielemán v. London Assurance Corp., 184 Cal. 524 [ 195 P. 45 , 18 A.L.R. 742 ] ; Robinson v. National Auto etc. Ins. 1962The standard policy provision requiring production of records and submission to examination is valid, and compliance with it is a condition to recovery on the policy (Hielemán v. London Assurance Corp., 184 Cal. 524 [ 195 P. 45 , 18 A.L.R. 742 ] ; Robinson v. National Auto etc. Ins.	1	1962–1962
Bole v. Bole green calctapp · 1946 1 sentence 1952(See, also, the case of Lowe v. Pierce, 76 Cal.App.2d 316 [ 172 P.2d 936 ].) The judgment is reversed.	1	1952–1952
Lowe v. Pierce neutral calctapp · 1946 1 sentence 1952(See, also, the case of Lowe v. Pierce, 76 Cal.App.2d 316 [ 172 P.2d 936 ].) The judgment is reversed.	1	1952–1952
Beyerle v. Clift green calctapp · 1922 2 sentences 1929Appellant cites the case of Beyerle v. Clift, 59 Cal. App. 7 [ 209 Pac. 1015 ], among others, in support of this contention. 1929Appellant cites the case of Beyerle v. Clift, 59 Cal. App. 7 [ 209 Pac. 1015 ], among others, in support of this contention.	1	1929–1929

Where else courts name it

TX 32 (1950–2024) MO 14 (1922–2024) MI 10 (1924–2024) NY 10 (1909–2017) CA 10 (1929–2023) GA 7 (1912–1992) IA 6 (1942–1985) DE 6 (1970–2025) UT 3 (1913–2012) CO 3 (1992–1997) IN 3 (1862–2020) WY 2 (1961–1992) FL 2 (1974–1986) SC 2 (1946–1986) AL 2 (2013–2017) KS 2 (1916–1921) WA 2 (2009–2009)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check