Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences2024“An inconsistent verdicts claim presents a pure question of law and is reviewed de novo.” Brown v. State, 959 So. 2d 218, 220 (Fla. 2007). 2024“An inconsistent verdicts claim presents a pure question of law and is reviewed de novo.” Brown v. State, 959 So. 2d 218, 220 (Fla. 2007). | 7 | 9 |
State v. Powellgreen2 sentences2024“As a general rule, inconsistent jury verdicts are permitted in Florida.” State v. Powell, 674 So. 2d 731, 732 (Fla. 1996). 2024“As a general rule, inconsistent jury verdicts are permitted in Florida.” State v. Powell, 674 So. 2d 731, 732 (Fla. 1996). | 3 | 4 |
Dial v. Stategreen2 sentences2014Analysis “An inconsistent verdicts claim presents a pure question of law and is reviewed de novo.” Brown v. State, 959 So.2d 218, 220 (Fla.2007) (citing Dial v. State, 922 So.2d 1018, 1020 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)). 2011“An inconsistent verdicts claim presents a pure question of law and is reviewed de novo.” Brown v. State, 959 So.2d 218, 220 (Fla.2007) (citing Dial v. State, 922 So.2d 1018, 1020 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)). | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
JOSHUA ZELAYA v. STATE OF FLORIDA
green
2 sentences2019"An inconsistent verdicts claim presents a pure question of law and is reviewed de novo." Zelaya v. State , 257 So.3d 493 , 496 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (quoting Brown v. State , 959 So.2d 218 , 220 (Fla. 2007) ). 2019"An inconsistent verdicts claim presents a pure question of law and is reviewed de novo." Zelaya v. State , 257 So.3d 493 , 496 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (quoting Brown v. State , 959 So.2d 218 , 220 (Fla. 2007) ). | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Gerald v. State
green
1 sentence2015“An inconsistent verdicts claim presents a pure question of law arid is reviewed de novo.” Gerald, 132 So.3d at 892 (quoting Brown v. State, 959 So.2d 218, 220 (Fla.2007)). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Eaton v. State
green
1 sentence2011“As a general rule, inconsistent jury verdicts are permitted in Florida.” Brown, 959 So.2d at 220 (citing Eaton v. State, 438 So.2d 822 (Fla.1983)). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.