Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Daily v. Stategreen2 sentences2009See Lewis v. State, 926 So.2d 437 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (court cannot treat rule 3.800(a) motion as rule 3.850 motion where motion is not properly sworn); Daily v. State, 750 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (affirming denial of 3.800(a) motion seeking jail credit without prejudice to defendant’s filing facially sufficient 3.800(a) motion demonstrating where in the record entitlement to relief can be shown or for defendant to file properly sworn rule 3.850 motion raising the same issue); Petscher v. State, 936 So.2d 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (if jail credit claim cannot be resolved from face of record 2008Daily v. State, 750 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). | 1 | 3 |
Lewis v. Stategreen1 sentence2009See Lewis v. State, 926 So.2d 437 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (court cannot treat rule 3.800(a) motion as rule 3.850 motion where motion is not properly sworn); Daily v. State, 750 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (affirming denial of 3.800(a) motion seeking jail credit without prejudice to defendant’s filing facially sufficient 3.800(a) motion demonstrating where in the record entitlement to relief can be shown or for defendant to file properly sworn rule 3.850 motion raising the same issue); Petscher v. State, 936 So.2d 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (if jail credit claim cannot be resolved from face of record | 1 | 1 |
Woody v. Stategreen1 sentence2009Woody v. State, 993 So.2d 1158, 1159 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). | 1 | 1 |
Oramas v. Stategreen1 sentence2003See Oramas, 615 So.2d 853 . | 1 | 1 |
Tennell v. Stategreen1 sentence2001See Tennell v. State, 787 So.2d 65 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Columbro v. State, 777 So.2d 1208 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). | 1 | 1 |
Hill v. Stategreen1 sentence2001See Hill v. State, 754 So.2d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). | 1 | 1 |
Toro v. Stategreen1 sentence1999See Daily v. State, — So.2d -, 1999 WL 212859 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr.7, 1999); Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); State v. Mancino; 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Mancinogreen1 sentence1999See Daily v. State, — So.2d -, 1999 WL 212859 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr.7, 1999); Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); State v. Mancino; 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998). | 1 | 1 |
Caldwell v. Stategreen1 sentence1995See, e.g., Caldwell v. State, 659 So.2d 1358 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). | 1 | 1 |
Anderson v. Stategreen1 sentence1995See Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1993); Gorham v. State, 494 So.2d 211 (Fla.1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Petscher v. State
green
1 sentence2009See Lewis v. State, 926 So.2d 437 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (court cannot treat rule 3.800(a) motion as rule 3.850 motion where motion is not properly sworn); Daily v. State, 750 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (affirming denial of 3.800(a) motion seeking jail credit without prejudice to defendant’s filing facially sufficient 3.800(a) motion demonstrating where in the record entitlement to relief can be shown or for defendant to file properly sworn rule 3.850 motion raising the same issue); Petscher v. State, 936 So.2d 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (if jail credit claim cannot be resolved from face of record | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Columbro v. State
green
1 sentence2001See Tennell v. State, 787 So.2d 65 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Columbro v. State, 777 So.2d 1208 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Stoutamire v. State
green
1 sentence1999However, the affirmance was "without prejudice to file a properly sworn rule 3.850 motion before the time expires to do so." Id. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Gorham v. State
green
1 sentence1995See Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1993); Gorham v. State, 494 So.2d 211 (Fla.1986). | 1 | 1995–1995 |