Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Globe Newspaper Co. v. Kinggreen2 sentences2019See Globe Newspaper Co., 658 So. 2d at 519-20 (holding that appellate courts have certiorari jurisdiction to review whether a trial court "has conformed with the procedural requirements of section -2- 768.72" and "should grant certiorari in instances in which there is a demonstration by a petitioner that the procedures of section 768.72 have not been followed"). 2019See Globe Newspaper Co., 658 So. 2d at 519-20 (holding that appellate courts have certiorari jurisdiction to review whether a trial court "has conformed with the procedural -2- requirements of section 768.72" and "should grant certiorari in instances in which there is a demonstration by a petitioner that the procedures of section 768.72 have not been followed"). | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Rossgreen2 sentences1989Ross reaffirmed this holding, although it rejected some of Sanders' analysis. 456 U.S. at 824 [ 102 S.Ct. at 2172-73 ]. 1989Ross reaffirmed this holding, although it rejected some of Sanders' analysis. 456 U.S. at 824 [ 102 S.Ct. at 2172-73 ]. | 1 | 2 |
Jackson v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See Hills v. State, 90 So.3d 927, 928 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (“The 2008 amendments to section 938.27(8) created mandatory minimum costs for the state attorney and removed the trial courts discretion to impose these costs.”). | 1 | 1 |
Adekunle v. Stategreen1 sentence2010The Second District determined that “[t]he law is well-settled that following revocation of probation the trial court must use the original scoresheet used at the time the defendant was placed on probation” and that the trial court shall “impose any sentence which it might have originally imposed before placing the probationer on probation.” Id. at 235 (quoting Adekunle v. State, 916 So.2d 950, 952 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); § 948.06(1), Fla. Stat. (2000)). | 1 | 1 |
Negron Gil De Rubio v. Stategreen1 sentence2010See Negron Gil de Rubio v. State, 987 So.2d 217, 219 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (“At the heart of any conspiracy is an agreement.... | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sanders v. State
green
2 sentences2017The First District upheld the trial court’s summary denial of Sanders’ motion, holding that counsel’s failure to request the instruction “does not create a reasonable probability that the jury, given the opportunity, would have returned a guilty verdict only as to the lesser offense.” Id. (citing Sanders, 847 So.2d at 508 ). 2017Id. - 17 - The First District upheld the trial court’s summary denial of Sanders’ motion, holding that counsel’s failure to request the instruction “does not create a reasonable probability that the jury, given the opportunity, would have returned a guilty verdict only as to the lesser offense.” Id. (citing Sanders, 847 So. 2d at 508 ). | 2 | 2006–2017 |
Willis v. State
green
2 sentences2017Conversely, the Fourth District reversed the trial court’s summary dismissal of Willis’s motion, holding that counsel’s failure to request the instruction was “a legally sufficient ground to support an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.” Id. (quoting Willis, 840 So.2d at 1136 ). 2017Conversely, the Fourth District reversed the trial court’s summary dismissal of Willis’s motion, holding that counsel’s failure to request the instruction was “a legally sufficient ground to support an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.” Id. (quoting Willis, 840 So. 2d at 1136 ). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Sanders v. State
green
2 sentences2017Id. - 17 - The First District upheld the trial court’s summary denial of Sanders’ motion, holding that counsel’s failure to request the instruction “does not create a reasonable probability that the jury, given the opportunity, would have returned a guilty verdict only as to the lesser offense.” Id. (citing Sanders, 847 So. 2d at 508 ). 2017Id. - 17 - The First District upheld the trial court’s summary denial of Sanders’ motion, holding that counsel’s failure to request the instruction “does not create a reasonable probability that the jury, given the opportunity, would have returned a guilty verdict only as to the lesser offense.” Id. (citing Sanders, 847 So. 2d at 508 ). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Hetland
green
1 sentence1980The trial court denied Sanders' motion to suppress this contraband on the authority of State v. Hetland, 366 So.2d 831 (Fla.2d DCA 1979). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.