Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1911–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sprint Transport Group, Inc. v. China Shipping NA Agency, Inc.green2 sentences2015Compliance with the notice requirements in OCGA § 9-11-6 (d) is mandatory, Sprint Transport Group v. China Shipping NA Agency, 313 Ga. App. 454, 456 ( 721 SE2d 659 ) (2011), and Appellants were entitled to notice of the hearing as contemplated by that statute. 2015Compliance with the notice requirements in OCGA § 9-11-6 (d) is mandatory, Sprint Transport Group v. China Shipping NA Agency, 313 Ga. App. 454, 456 ( 721 SE2d 659 ) (2011), and Appellants were entitled to notice of the hearing as contemplated by that statute. | 2 | 2 |
Hedquist v. Hedquistgreen2 sentences2026See Randall v. Randall, 274 Ga. 107, 109 (2) ( 549 SE2d 384 ) (2001) (“Notice of the hearing shall be served not later than five days before the time specified for the hearing.”) (quoting OCGA § 9-11-6(d) (punctuation omitted)); See also Hedquist v. Hedquist, 275 Ga. 188, 189 ( 563 SE2d 854 ) (2002) (“personally serving a party with a motion for contempt and a rule nisi 17 days before the show cause hearing complies with the notice requirements of due process”). 2026See Randall v. Randall, 274 Ga. 107, 109 (2) ( 549 SE2d 384 ) (2001) (“Notice of the hearing shall be served not later than five days before the time specified for the hearing.”) (quoting OCGA § 9-11-6(d) (punctuation omitted)); See also Hedquist v. Hedquist, 275 Ga. 188, 189 ( 563 SE2d 854 ) (2002) (“personally serving a party with a motion for contempt and a rule nisi 17 days before the show cause hearing complies with the notice requirements of due process”). | 1 | 1 |
Randall v. Randallgreen2 sentences2026See Randall v. Randall, 274 Ga. 107, 109 (2) ( 549 SE2d 384 ) (2001) (“Notice of the hearing shall be served not later than five days before the time specified for the hearing.”) (quoting OCGA § 9-11-6(d) (punctuation omitted)); See also Hedquist v. Hedquist, 275 Ga. 188, 189 ( 563 SE2d 854 ) (2002) (“personally serving a party with a motion for contempt and a rule nisi 17 days before the show cause hearing complies with the notice requirements of due process”). 2026See Randall v. Randall, 274 Ga. 107, 109 (2) ( 549 SE2d 384 ) (2001) (“Notice of the hearing shall be served not later than five days before the time specified for the hearing.”) (quoting OCGA § 9-11-6(d) (punctuation omitted)); See also Hedquist v. Hedquist, 275 Ga. 188, 189 ( 563 SE2d 854 ) (2002) (“personally serving a party with a motion for contempt and a rule nisi 17 days before the show cause hearing complies with the notice requirements of due process”). | 1 | 1 |
Glass v. Glovergreen2 sentences2020OCGA § 9-11-6 (d) provides in relevant part: “A written motion, other than one which may be heard ex parte, and notice of the hearing thereof shall be served not later than five days before the time specified for the hearing, unless a different period is fixed by this chapter or by order of the court.” “When a hearing is held on any motion, OCGA § 9-11-6 (d) requires 8 notice of the hearing to be served on counsel, if for no other reason than to avoid the appearance of ex parte contact.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Glass v. Glover, 241 Ga. App. 838, 838 ( 528 SE2d 262 ) (2000). 2020OCGA § 9-11-6 (d) provides in relevant part: “A written motion, other than one which may be heard ex parte, and notice of the hearing thereof shall be served not later than five days before the time specified for the hearing, unless a different period is fixed by this chapter or by order of the court.” “When a hearing is held on any motion, OCGA § 9-11-6 (d) requires 8 notice of the hearing to be served on counsel, if for no other reason than to avoid the appearance of ex parte contact.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Glass v. Glover, 241 Ga. App. 838, 838 ( 528 SE2d 262 ) (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Atlanta Business Video, LLC v. Fantrace, LLCgreen2 sentences2017Video v. FanTrace, LLC, 324 Ga. App. 559, 560 ( 751 SE2d 169 ) (2013) (footnote omitted). 35 Hammonds, supra at 498 . 36 See USCR 8.3; Edens, supra (trial court erred in refusing to set aside order entered following hearing held without notice to complaining party); King v. Bd. of Regents, 215 Ga. App. 570, 571 ( 451 SE2d 482 ) (1994) (trial court erred in refusing to set aside order dismissing complaint entered after plaintiff failed to attend hearing about which he had insufficient notice). 2017Video v. FanTrace, LLC, 324 Ga. App. 559, 560 ( 751 SE2d 169 ) (2013) (footnote omitted). 35 Hammonds, supra at 498 . 36 See USCR 8.3; Edens, supra (trial court erred in refusing to set aside order entered following hearing held without notice to complaining party); King v. Bd. of Regents, 215 Ga. App. 570, 571 ( 451 SE2d 482 ) (1994) (trial court erred in refusing to set aside order dismissing complaint entered after plaintiff failed to attend hearing about which he had insufficient notice). | 1 | 1 |
King v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgiagreen2 sentences2017Video v. FanTrace, LLC, 324 Ga. App. 559, 560 ( 751 SE2d 169 ) (2013) (footnote omitted). 35 Hammonds, supra at 498 . 36 See USCR 8.3; Edens, supra (trial court erred in refusing to set aside order entered following hearing held without notice to complaining party); King v. Bd. of Regents, 215 Ga. App. 570, 571 ( 451 SE2d 482 ) (1994) (trial court erred in refusing to set aside order dismissing complaint entered after plaintiff failed to attend hearing about which he had insufficient notice). 2017Video v. FanTrace, LLC, 324 Ga. App. 559, 560 ( 751 SE2d 169 ) (2013) (footnote omitted). 35 Hammonds, supra at 498 . 36 See USCR 8.3; Edens, supra (trial court erred in refusing to set aside order entered following hearing held without notice to complaining party); King v. Bd. of Regents, 215 Ga. App. 570, 571 ( 451 SE2d 482 ) (1994) (trial court erred in refusing to set aside order dismissing complaint entered after plaintiff failed to attend hearing about which he had insufficient notice). | 1 | 1 |
Herringdine v. Nalley Equipment Leasing Ltd.green2 sentences2008Leasing, 238 Ga. App. 210, 212 (2) ( 517 SE2d 571 ) (1999). 2008Leasing, 238 Ga. App. 210, 212 (2) ( 517 SE2d 571 ) (1999). | 1 | 1 |
Fairington, Inc. v. Yeargin Construction Co.green2 sentences1978See Fairington, Inc. v. Yeargin Const. Co., Inc., 144 Ga. App. 491 (1) ( 241 SE2d 608 ); Wall v. C & S Bank, 145 Ga. App. 76 ( 243 SE2d 271 ). 1978See Fairington, Inc. v. Yeargin Const. Co., Inc., 144 Ga. App. 491 (1) ( 241 SE2d 608 ); Wall v. C & S Bank, 145 Ga. App. 76 ( 243 SE2d 271 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Edens v. O'CONNORyellow2 sentences2017Video v. FanTrace, LLC, 324 Ga. App. 559, 560 ( 751 SE2d 169 ) (2013) (footnote omitted). 35 Hammonds, supra at 498 . 36 See USCR 8.3; Edens, supra (trial court erred in refusing to set aside order entered following hearing held without notice to complaining party); King v. Bd. of Regents, 215 Ga. App. 570, 571 ( 451 SE2d 482 ) (1994) (trial court erred in refusing to set aside order dismissing complaint entered after plaintiff failed to attend hearing about which he had insufficient notice). 2017But see Edens, supra (“Publication of notice of a motion hearing date is not, by itself, sufficient).]”) (punctuation omitted). 33 See OCGA §§ 9-11-6 (d) (generally, written notice of a motion hearing must “be served not later than five days before the time specified for the hearing”); 9-11-5 (b) (“Service upon the attorney or upon a party shall be made by delivering a copy to the person to be served or by mailing it to the person to be served at the person’s last known address or, if no address is known, by leaving it with the clerk of the court.”). 34 Atlanta Bus. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Luerica Fiffee v. Michael Jiggetts
green
2 sentences2024Under OCGA § 9-11-6 (d), notice of a hearing must be served on a party “not later than five days before the time specified for the hearing[.]” Service of the notice of a hearing pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-6 (d) is governed by OCGA § 9-11-5 (b), which provides that “[s]ervice . . . shall be made by delivering a copy to the person to be served or by mailing it to the person to be served at the person’s last known address[.]” See Fiffee v. Jiggetts, 353 Ga. App. 730 , 734 (2) ( 839 SE2d 224 ) (2020). 2024Under OCGA § 9-11-6 (d), notice of a hearing must be served on a party “not later than five days before the time specified for the hearing[.]” Service of the notice of a hearing pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-6 (d) is governed by OCGA § 9-11-5 (b), which provides that “[s]ervice . . . shall be made by delivering a copy to the person to be served or by mailing it to the person to be served at the person’s last known address[.]” See Fiffee v. Jiggetts, 353 Ga. App. 730 , 734 (2) ( 839 SE2d 224 ) (2020). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Vaughan v. Buice
green
2 sentences1986Held: Ordinarily, where no transcript or agreed statement of facts is furnished, “the appellate court is bound to assume that the trial court’s findings are supported by sufficient competent evidence for there is a presumption in favor of the regularity of all proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Vaughan v. Buice, 253 Ga. 540 ( 322 SE2d 282 ) (1984). 1986Held: Ordinarily, where no transcript or agreed statement of facts is furnished, “the appellate court is bound to assume that the trial court’s findings are supported by sufficient competent evidence for there is a presumption in favor of the regularity of all proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Vaughan v. Buice, 253 Ga. 540 ( 322 SE2d 282 ) (1984). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Wall v. Citizens & Southern Bank
green
2 sentences1978See Fairington, Inc. v. Yeargin Const. Co., Inc., 144 Ga. App. 491 (1) ( 241 SE2d 608 ); Wall v. C & S Bank, 145 Ga. App. 76 ( 243 SE2d 271 ). 1978See Fairington, Inc. v. Yeargin Const. Co., Inc., 144 Ga. App. 491 (1) ( 241 SE2d 608 ); Wall v. C & S Bank, 145 Ga. App. 76 ( 243 SE2d 271 ). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Bulloch County Bank v. Dodd
green
2 sentences1976Section 6 of the Civil Practice Act (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 618, as amended by Ga. L. 1967, pp. 226, 229; Code Ann. § 81A-106 (d)) in subsection (d) thereof provides: "A written motion, other than one which may be heard ex parte, and notice of the hearing thereof shall be served and not later than five days before the time specified for the hearing, unless a different period is fixed by this Act or by order of the court.” The Supreme Court of this state in Bulloch County Bank v. Dodd, 226 Ga. 773 (1) ( 177 SE2d 673 ) held that the failure to give the five day notice required, in the absence of 1976Section 6 of the Civil Practice Act (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 618, as amended by Ga. L. 1967, pp. 226, 229; Code Ann. § 81A-106 (d)) in subsection (d) thereof provides: "A written motion, other than one which may be heard ex parte, and notice of the hearing thereof shall be served and not later than five days before the time specified for the hearing, unless a different period is fixed by this Act or by order of the court.” The Supreme Court of this state in Bulloch County Bank v. Dodd, 226 Ga. 773 (1) ( 177 SE2d 673 ) held that the failure to give the five day notice required, in the absence of | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Aetna Indemnity, Co. v. John Waters
green
2 sentences1911Frost on Law of Guaranty Insurance (2d ed.), § 210; United Surety Co. v. Summers, 110 Md. 95 ( 72 Atl. 775 ); Ætna Indemnity Co. v. Waters, 110 Md. 673 ( 73 Atl. 712 ); Lakeside Land Co. v. Empire State Surety Co., 105 Minn. 213 ( 117 N. W. 431 ); Beebe v. Redward, 35 Wash. 615 ( 77 Pac. 1052 ); Ovington v. Ætna Indemnity Co., 36 Wash. 473 ( 78 Pac. 1021 ); Heffernan v. U. S. Fidelity &c. 1911Frost on Law of Guaranty Insurance (2d ed.), § 210; United Surety Co. v. Summers, 110 Md. 95 ( 72 Atl. 775 ); Ætna Indemnity Co. v. Waters, 110 Md. 673 ( 73 Atl. 712 ); Lakeside Land Co. v. Empire State Surety Co., 105 Minn. 213 ( 117 N. W. 431 ); Beebe v. Redward, 35 Wash. 615 ( 77 Pac. 1052 ); Ovington v. Ætna Indemnity Co., 36 Wash. 473 ( 78 Pac. 1021 ); Heffernan v. U. S. Fidelity &c. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
United Surety Co. v. Summers
green
2 sentences1911Frost on Law of Guaranty Insurance (2d ed.), § 210; United Surety Co. v. Summers, 110 Md. 95 ( 72 Atl. 775 ); Ætna Indemnity Co. v. Waters, 110 Md. 673 ( 73 Atl. 712 ); Lakeside Land Co. v. Empire State Surety Co., 105 Minn. 213 ( 117 N. W. 431 ); Beebe v. Redward, 35 Wash. 615 ( 77 Pac. 1052 ); Ovington v. Ætna Indemnity Co., 36 Wash. 473 ( 78 Pac. 1021 ); Heffernan v. U. S. Fidelity &c. 1911Frost on Law of Guaranty Insurance (2d ed.), § 210; United Surety Co. v. Summers, 110 Md. 95 ( 72 Atl. 775 ); Ætna Indemnity Co. v. Waters, 110 Md. 673 ( 73 Atl. 712 ); Lakeside Land Co. v. Empire State Surety Co., 105 Minn. 213 ( 117 N. W. 431 ); Beebe v. Redward, 35 Wash. 615 ( 77 Pac. 1052 ); Ovington v. Ætna Indemnity Co., 36 Wash. 473 ( 78 Pac. 1021 ); Heffernan v. U. S. Fidelity &c. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Lakeside Land Co. v. Empire State Surety Co.
green
2 sentences1911Frost on Law of Guaranty Insurance (2d ed.), § 210; United Surety Co. v. Summers, 110 Md. 95 ( 72 Atl. 775 ); Ætna Indemnity Co. v. Waters, 110 Md. 673 ( 73 Atl. 712 ); Lakeside Land Co. v. Empire State Surety Co., 105 Minn. 213 ( 117 N. W. 431 ); Beebe v. Redward, 35 Wash. 615 ( 77 Pac. 1052 ); Ovington v. Ætna Indemnity Co., 36 Wash. 473 ( 78 Pac. 1021 ); Heffernan v. U. S. Fidelity &c. 1911Frost on Law of Guaranty Insurance (2d ed.), § 210; United Surety Co. v. Summers, 110 Md. 95 ( 72 Atl. 775 ); Ætna Indemnity Co. v. Waters, 110 Md. 673 ( 73 Atl. 712 ); Lakeside Land Co. v. Empire State Surety Co., 105 Minn. 213 ( 117 N. W. 431 ); Beebe v. Redward, 35 Wash. 615 ( 77 Pac. 1052 ); Ovington v. Ætna Indemnity Co., 36 Wash. 473 ( 78 Pac. 1021 ); Heffernan v. U. S. Fidelity &c. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Beebe v. Redward
neutral
2 sentences1911Frost on Law of Guaranty Insurance (2d ed.), § 210; United Surety Co. v. Summers, 110 Md. 95 ( 72 Atl. 775 ); Ætna Indemnity Co. v. Waters, 110 Md. 673 ( 73 Atl. 712 ); Lakeside Land Co. v. Empire State Surety Co., 105 Minn. 213 ( 117 N. W. 431 ); Beebe v. Redward, 35 Wash. 615 ( 77 Pac. 1052 ); Ovington v. Ætna Indemnity Co., 36 Wash. 473 ( 78 Pac. 1021 ); Heffernan v. U. S. Fidelity &c. 1911Frost on Law of Guaranty Insurance (2d ed.), § 210; United Surety Co. v. Summers, 110 Md. 95 ( 72 Atl. 775 ); Ætna Indemnity Co. v. Waters, 110 Md. 673 ( 73 Atl. 712 ); Lakeside Land Co. v. Empire State Surety Co., 105 Minn. 213 ( 117 N. W. 431 ); Beebe v. Redward, 35 Wash. 615 ( 77 Pac. 1052 ); Ovington v. Ætna Indemnity Co., 36 Wash. 473 ( 78 Pac. 1021 ); Heffernan v. U. S. Fidelity &c. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Ovington v. Aetna Indemnity Co.
green
2 sentences1911Frost on Law of Guaranty Insurance (2d ed.), § 210; United Surety Co. v. Summers, 110 Md. 95 ( 72 Atl. 775 ); Ætna Indemnity Co. v. Waters, 110 Md. 673 ( 73 Atl. 712 ); Lakeside Land Co. v. Empire State Surety Co., 105 Minn. 213 ( 117 N. W. 431 ); Beebe v. Redward, 35 Wash. 615 ( 77 Pac. 1052 ); Ovington v. Ætna Indemnity Co., 36 Wash. 473 ( 78 Pac. 1021 ); Heffernan v. U. S. Fidelity &c. 1911Frost on Law of Guaranty Insurance (2d ed.), § 210; United Surety Co. v. Summers, 110 Md. 95 ( 72 Atl. 775 ); Ætna Indemnity Co. v. Waters, 110 Md. 673 ( 73 Atl. 712 ); Lakeside Land Co. v. Empire State Surety Co., 105 Minn. 213 ( 117 N. W. 431 ); Beebe v. Redward, 35 Wash. 615 ( 77 Pac. 1052 ); Ovington v. Ætna Indemnity Co., 36 Wash. 473 ( 78 Pac. 1021 ); Heffernan v. U. S. Fidelity &c. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.