Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Guyton v. Irving Jensen Co.green2 sentences2026The odd-lot analysis depends on determining if the 10 types of work “the worker can perform are ‘so limited in quality, dependability, or quantity that a reasonably stable market for them does not exist.” Guyton, 373 N.W.2d at 105 (citation omitted). 2014The odd-lot doctrine allows the commission to find an employee has suffered a total disability if the worker can only perform work “so limited in quality, dependability, or quantity that a reasonably stable market for them does not exist.” Guyton v. Irving Jensen Co., 373 N.W.2d 101, 105 (Iowa 1985) (internal quotation marks omitted). | 4 | 5 |
Armstrong v. State of Iowa Buildings & Groundsgreen2 sentences1993Armstrong v. State of Iowa Bldgs., 382 N.W.2d 161, 167 (Iowa 1986). 1986As we indicated in Armstrong, 382 N.W.2d at 167 , claims concerning the applicability of this doctrine must be raised before the industrial commissioner or they will not be considered on judicial review. | 1 | 2 |
City of Marion v. Iowa Department of Revenue & Financegreen1 sentence2020Another indication an agency has been granted interpretative authority arises when an agency “must necessarily interpret [an undefined] term in order to carry out its duties.” Renda, 784 N.W.2d at 12 (discussing City of Marion v. Iowa Department of Revenue & Finance, 643 N.W.2d 205, 207 (Iowa 2002)). | 1 | 1 |
Renda v. Iowa Civil Rights Commissiongreen1 sentence2020Another indication an agency has been granted interpretative authority arises when an agency “must necessarily interpret [an undefined] term in order to carry out its duties.” Renda, 784 N.W.2d at 12 (discussing City of Marion v. Iowa Department of Revenue & Finance, 643 N.W.2d 205, 207 (Iowa 2002)). | 1 | 1 |
Second Injury Fund of Iowa v. Shankgreen2 sentences2012“Simply put,” we observed in Second Injury Fund of Iowa v. Shank, 516 N.W.2d 808, 815 (Iowa 1994), “the question is this: Are there jobs in the community that the employee can do for which the employee can realistically compete?” For purposes of the odd-lot doctrine, then, we have held that an employee need not look for a position outside the employee’s “competitive labor market” to establish he suffers a total disability. 2012“Simply put,” we observed in Second Injury Fund of Iowa v. Shank, 516 N.W.2d 808, 815 (Iowa 1994), “the question is this: Are there jobs in the community that the employee can do for which the employee can realistically compete?” For purposes of the odd- lot doctrine, then, we have held that an employee need not look for a position outside the employee’s “competitive labor market” to establish he suffers a total disability. | 1 | 1 |
Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.green2 sentences1989Under that doctrine, a worker becomes an odd-lot employee when an injury makes the worker incapable of obtaining employment in any well-known branch of the labor market. 'An odd-lot worker is thus totally disabled if the only services the worker can perform are “so limited in quality, dependability, or quantity that a reasonably stable market for them does not exist_” Guyton v. Irving Jensen Co., 373 N.W.2d 101, 105 (Iowa 1985) (quoting with approval, Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co., 230 Minn. 315, 320 , 41 N.W.2d 433, 436 (1950)). 1989Under that doctrine, a worker becomes an odd-lot employee when an injury makes the worker incapable of obtaining employment in any well-known branch of the labor market. 'An odd-lot worker is thus totally disabled if the only services the worker can perform are “so limited in quality, dependability, or quantity that a reasonably stable market for them does not exist_” Guyton v. Irving Jensen Co., 373 N.W.2d 101, 105 (Iowa 1985) (quoting with approval, Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co., 230 Minn. 315, 320 , 41 N.W.2d 433, 436 (1950)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Second Injury Fund of Iowa v. Nelson
green
1 sentence2021“An odd-lot employee is one who is incapable of finding work in any established branch of the labor market.” Nelson, 544 N.W.2d at 267 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Tim Neal v. Annett Holdings, Inc.
green
1 sentence2020Whereas we concluded the phrase “suitable work” had a specialized legal meaning that extended beyond the context of workers’ compensation to support our conclusion that the workers’ compensation commission lacked authority to interpret that phrase, see Neal v. Annett Holdings, Inc., 814 N.W.2d 512 , 518–19 (Iowa 2012) (noting “suitable work” also arose in employment discrimination, wrongful termination, unemployment compensation, and the odd-lot doctrine), the specialized meaning of “material participation” does not extend into other substantive areas of law. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Michael Eberhart Construction v. Curtin
green
2 sentences2014In Curtin, the claimant moved to amend her petition to include the odd-lot doctrine after the evidentiary record was closed. 674 N.W.2d at 125 . 2014In Curtin, the commissioner expressly reviewed the deputy’s ruling as an odd-lot decision: “In fact, on the intra- agency appeal to the commissioner, the commissioner identified the disability issues as only (1) whether the claimant should have been allowed to amend his petition to assert the odd-lot doctrine and (2) whether the claimant is an odd-lot employee.” Id. at 127 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.