Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Spring v. Department of Labor & Industriesgreen2 sentences2017Chaney, 176 Wn.2d at 732 ; Leeper, 123 Wn.2d at 815 ; Spring, 96 Wn.2d at 919 . 1994See Spring, 96 Wn.2d at 925 (Utter, J., dissenting). | 2 | 3 |
Moss v. STATE EX REL. WORKERS'COMP. DIV.green2 sentences2013App. 692 , 559 P .2d 572 (1977). 3 One nice summary of the practical effect of the doctrine comes from Wyoming: "Under the odd lot doctrine, a claimant who is not actually permanently totally disabled is able to receive permanent total disability benefits because the claimant's disability and other factors make the claimant de facto unemployable." Moss v. Workers' Safety and Compo Div., 232 P.3d 1,5 (Wyo. 2010). 8 No. 30796-4-III Erb v. Dep't ofLabor & Indus. disability where the defendant would not otherwise be considered disabled. 2013App. 692 , 559 P .2d 572 (1977). 3 One nice summary of the practical effect of the doctrine comes from Wyoming: "Under the odd lot doctrine, a claimant who is not actually permanently totally disabled is able to receive permanent total disability benefits because the claimant's disability and other factors make the claimant de facto unemployable." Moss v. Workers' Safety and Compo Div., 232 P.3d 1,5 (Wyo. 2010). 8 No. 30796-4-III Erb v. Dep't ofLabor & Indus. disability where the defendant would not otherwise be considered disabled. | 2 | 2 |
Fochtman v. Department of Labor & Industriesgreen1 sentence1993Spring, 96 Wn.2d at 918 ; Kuhnle, 12 Wn.2d at 198-99 ; Allen, 30 Wn. *62 App. at 697-98; Fochtman, 7 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
Kuhnle v. Department of Labor & Industriesgreen2 sentences1993Spring, 96 Wn.2d at 918 ; Kuhnle, 12 Wn.2d at 198-99 ; Allen, 30 Wn. *62 App. at 697-98; Fochtman, 7 Wn. 1993Spring, 96 Wn.2d at 918, 919-20 ; Kuhnle, 12 Wn.2d at 197, 198, 199 ; Allen, 30 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
Allen v. Department of Labor & Industriesgreen1 sentence1993Spring, 96 Wn.2d at 918, 919-20 ; Kuhnle, 12 Wn.2d at 197, 198, 199 ; Allen, 30 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Leeper v. Department of Labor & Industries
green
2 sentences2017Id. 2017Chaney, 176 Wn.2d at 732 ; Leeper, 123 Wn.2d at 815 ; Spring, 96 Wn.2d at 919 . | 6 | 1996–2017 |
Graham v. Weyerhaeuser Company
green
2 sentences2013The State argues that no prejudice can ever befall a claimant when a court refuses an odd lot instruction because the odd lot doctrine is just "an additional way for a worker to lose." Graham v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 71 Wn. 2013The State argues that no prejudice can ever befall a claimant when a court refuses an odd lot instruction because the odd lot doctrine is just "an additional way for a worker to lose." Graham v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 71 Wn. | 3 | 2013–2019 |
Allen v. Department of Labor & Industries
green
2 sentences2013This quotation from Graham presents an incorrect characterization because the odd lot doctrine creates a presumption of permanent total 2 But see Allen v. Dep 't ofLabor & Indus., 16 Wn. 2013This quotation from Graham presents an incorrect characterization because the odd lot doctrine creates a presumption of permanent total 2 But see Allen v. Dep 't ofLabor & Indus., 16 Wn. | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Chaney v. Providence Health Care
green
1 sentence2017Chaney, 176 Wn.2d at 732 ; Leeper, 123 Wn.2d at 815 ; Spring, 96 Wn.2d at 919 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.