Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State of Iowa v. Jesse Michael Gaskinsgreen1 sentence2024That exception “derives from interests in officer safety and evidence preservation that are typically implicated in arrest situations.” Gant, 556 U.S. at 338 ; accord Gaskins, 866 N.W.2d at 8 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Cerongreen1 sentence2019“A lawful arrest is, of course, a predicate for a lawful search incident to the arrest.” State v. Ceron, 573 N.W.2d 587, 589 (Iowa 1997). | 1 | 1 |
Vonda Kay Wilson v. Commonwealth of Virginiagreen1 sentence2017The State relies on the analysis from a similar sentencing challenge before a Virginia appellate court, quoting: “Nowhere in the ADA does it appear that Congress intended the Act to provide rights that could be asserted in a criminal proceeding . . . .” See Wilson v. Commonwealth, 522 S.E.2d 385, 387 (Va. Ct. App. 1999). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kirchoffgreen1 sentence2002(Emphasis added.) We held in State v. Kirchoff, 452 N.W.2d 801, 804 (Iowa 1990), that substantial compliance with this rule is all that is required, and the State relies on that principle here. | 1 | 1 |
New York v. Beltonred2 sentences1998In an attempt to draw a bright-line rule in cases involving vehicle searches incident to arrest, the Supreme Court held in New York v. Belton that when a policeman has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, he may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the passenger compartment of that automobile. 453 U.S. 454, 460 , 101 S.Ct. 2860, 2864 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768, 775 (1981) (footnotes omitted). 1998In an attempt to draw a bright-line rule in cases involving vehicle searches incident to arrest, the Supreme Court held in New York v. Belton that when a policeman has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, he may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the passenger compartment of that automobile. 453 U.S. 454, 460 , 101 S.Ct. 2860, 2864 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768, 775 (1981) (footnotes omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hartunggreen2 sentences1976See Rule 196, Rules of Civil Procedure; State v. Smith, 215 N.W.2d 225, 227 (Iowa 1974); State v. Dague, 206 N.W.2d 93, 95 (Iowa 1973); State v. Cox, 196 N.W.2d 430, 432 (Iowa 1972); State v. Hartung, 239 Iowa 414, 423-424 , 30 N.W.2d 491, 497 (1948). 1976See Rule 196, Rules of Civil Procedure; State v. Smith, 215 N.W.2d 225, 227 (Iowa 1974); State v. Dague, 206 N.W.2d 93, 95 (Iowa 1973); State v. Cox, 196 N.W.2d 430, 432 (Iowa 1972); State v. Hartung, 239 Iowa 414, 423-424 , 30 N.W.2d 491, 497 (1948). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Coxgreen1 sentence1976See Rule 196, Rules of Civil Procedure; State v. Smith, 215 N.W.2d 225, 227 (Iowa 1974); State v. Dague, 206 N.W.2d 93, 95 (Iowa 1973); State v. Cox, 196 N.W.2d 430, 432 (Iowa 1972); State v. Hartung, 239 Iowa 414, 423-424 , 30 N.W.2d 491, 497 (1948). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Smithgreen1 sentence1976See Rule 196, Rules of Civil Procedure; State v. Smith, 215 N.W.2d 225, 227 (Iowa 1974); State v. Dague, 206 N.W.2d 93, 95 (Iowa 1973); State v. Cox, 196 N.W.2d 430, 432 (Iowa 1972); State v. Hartung, 239 Iowa 414, 423-424 , 30 N.W.2d 491, 497 (1948). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Daguegreen1 sentence1976See Rule 196, Rules of Civil Procedure; State v. Smith, 215 N.W.2d 225, 227 (Iowa 1974); State v. Dague, 206 N.W.2d 93, 95 (Iowa 1973); State v. Cox, 196 N.W.2d 430, 432 (Iowa 1972); State v. Hartung, 239 Iowa 414, 423-424 , 30 N.W.2d 491, 497 (1948). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Clarkgreen2 sentences1976The State relies on rule 196, Rules of Civil Procedure, and State v. Clark, 187 N.W.2d 717, 719 (Iowa 1971) and State v. Schmidt, 259 Iowa 972, 979-980 , 145 N.W.2d 631, 636 , as support for its position. 1976The State relies on rule 196, Rules of Civil Procedure, and State v. Clark, 187 N.W.2d 717, 719 (Iowa 1971) and State v. Schmidt, 259 Iowa 972, 979-980 , 145 N.W.2d 631, 636 , as support for its position. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Illinois v. Rodriguez
green
2 sentences2016The doctrine has its genesis in the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 , 110 S. Ct. 2793 , 111 L. 2016The doctrine has its genesis in the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 , 110 S. Ct. 2793 , 111 L. | 3 | 2016–2016 |
Arizona v. Gant
green
1 sentence2024That exception “derives from interests in officer safety and evidence preservation that are typically implicated in arrest situations.” Gant, 556 U.S. at 338 ; accord Gaskins, 866 N.W.2d at 8 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Howard
green
1 sentence1998One exception is a search incident to arrest, id. at 766-67 , and the State relies on that exception here. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Schmidt
green
2 sentences1976The State relies on rule 196, Rules of Civil Procedure, and State v. Clark, 187 N.W.2d 717, 719 (Iowa 1971) and State v. Schmidt, 259 Iowa 972, 979-980 , 145 N.W.2d 631, 636 , as support for its position. 1976The State relies on rule 196, Rules of Civil Procedure, and State v. Clark, 187 N.W.2d 717, 719 (Iowa 1971) and State v. Schmidt, 259 Iowa 972, 979-980 , 145 N.W.2d 631, 636 , as support for its position. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.