10 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Shinn v. Martinez Ramirezgreen2 sentences2026However, in 2022, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Shinn v. Ramirez, which held that federal courts generally could not consider new evidence for the purposes of a Martinez claim and were instead bound by the evidence introduced in prior state court proceedings. 596 U.S. at 380–82. 2025The United States Supreme Court then issued its opinion in Shinn v. Ramirez in 2022, which held that federal courts generally could not consider new evidence for the purposes of a Martinez claim and were instead bound by the evidence introduced in prior state court proceedings. 596 U.S. 366 , 380–82 (2022). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Graygreen2 sentences2021Regardless, we analyze Martinez’s challenge under this case law because both parties rely on it. “[T]he denial of a motion in limine generally preserves an issue for appeal.” State v. Gray, 129 Idaho 784, 793 , 932 P.2d 907, 916 (Ct. App. 1997). 2021Regardless, we analyze Martinez’s challenge under this case law because both parties rely on it. “[T]he denial of a motion in limine generally preserves an issue for appeal.” State v. Gray, 129 Idaho 784, 793 , 932 P.2d 907, 916 (Ct. App. 1997). | 1 | 1 |
Martinez v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Martinez v. State, 143 Idaho 789, 795 , 152 P.3d 1237, 1243 (Ct.App.2007) (analyzing Martinez’s claim that his plea was involuntary because he was not aware of the intent element of the crime and then analyzing Martinez’s claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not informing him of the intent element). 4 . 2015See Martinez v. State, 143 Idaho 789, 795 , 152 P.3d 1237, 1243 (Ct.App.2007) (analyzing Martinez’s claim that his plea was involuntary because he was not aware of the intent element of the crime and then analyzing Martinez’s claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not informing him of the intent element). 4 . | 1 | 1 |
Trevino v. Thalergreen2 sentences2014Because the District Court Did Not Appoint Counsel, We Must Determine Whether Brown Alleged Facts That Raised the Possibility of a Valid Claim Generally, in order to determine whether the district court properly summarily dismissed a petition for post-conviction relief, we must determine whether “it appears from the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions and agreements of fact, together with any affidavits submitted, that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is 2 In Trevino v. Thaler, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 133 S. Ct. 1911, 1921 (2013), the Su 2014Because the District Court Did Not Appoint Counsel, We Must Determine Whether Brown Alleged Facts That Raised the Possibility of a Valid Claim Generally, in order to determine whether the district court properly summarily dismissed a petition for post-conviction relief, we must determine whether “it appears from the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions and agreements of fact, together with any affidavits submitted, that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is 2 In Trevino v. Thaler, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 133 S. Ct. 1911, 1921 (2013), the Su | 1 | 1 |
Hoffman v. Stategreen2 sentences2013See Hoffman v. State, 153 Idaho 898, 908 , 277 P.3d 1050, 1060 (Ct. App. 2012) (holding summary dismissal of the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to appeal was appropriate where the district court found the petitioner’s assertion that he requested counsel file an appeal was not supported by the record and noting that none of the exhibits submitted by the petitioner indicated he requested counsel file an appeal “within the requisite time period”). 2013See Hoffman v. State, 153 Idaho 898, 908 , 277 P.3d 1050, 1060 (Ct. App. 2012) (holding summary dismissal of the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to appeal was appropriate where the district court found the petitioner’s assertion that he requested counsel file an appeal was not supported by the record and noting that none of the exhibits submitted by the petitioner indicated he requested counsel file an appeal “within the requisite time period”). | 1 | 1 |
Esquivel v. Stategreen2 sentences1997See Esquivel v. State, 128 Idaho 390 , 913 P.2d 1160 (1996); Chapman v. State, 128 Idaho 733, 734 , 918 P.2d 602, 603 (Ct.App.1996). 1997See Esquivel v. State, 128 Idaho 390 , 913 P.2d 1160 (1996); Chapman v. State, 128 Idaho 733, 734 , 918 P.2d 602, 603 (Ct.App.1996). | 1 | 1 |
Chapman v. Stategreen2 sentences1997See Esquivel v. State, 128 Idaho 390 , 913 P.2d 1160 (1996); Chapman v. State, 128 Idaho 733, 734 , 918 P.2d 602, 603 (Ct.App.1996). 1997See Esquivel v. State, 128 Idaho 390 , 913 P.2d 1160 (1996); Chapman v. State, 128 Idaho 733, 734 , 918 P.2d 602, 603 (Ct.App.1996). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bonner County v. Panhandle Rodeo Ass'n, Inc.
green
1 sentence2022Id. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Gerstner v. Washington Water Power Co.
neutral
1 sentence1995In DesFosses v. DesFosses, 122 Idaho 684 , 836 P.2d 1095 (Ct.App.1992), we held that the trial judge’s prior representation of the brother of the defendant did not constitute grounds for disqualification because the brother was not a party to the action and was not affected by its outcome. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
DesFosses v. DesFosses
green
1 sentence1995In DesFosses v. DesFosses, 122 Idaho 684 , 836 P.2d 1095 (Ct.App.1992), we held that the trial judge’s prior representation of the brother of the defendant did not constitute grounds for disqualification because the brother was not a party to the action and was not affected by its outcome. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Flint
green
2 sentences1992Ill We turn next to Martinez’ contention that the giving of Instruction No. 33 constituted a prohibited “dynamite instruction” requiring reversal under State v. Flint, 114 Idaho 806 , 761 P.2d 1158 (1988). 1992Ill We turn next to Martinez’ contention that the giving of Instruction No. 33 constituted a prohibited “dynamite instruction” requiring reversal under State v. Flint, 114 Idaho 806 , 761 P.2d 1158 (1988). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.