Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Outler v. Nortonred1 sentence2026The docket indicates that after the case was remanded, the postconviction court held a hearing, granted Martinez’s motion to enforce the plea agreement, and concluded that he had completed his sentence.2 The postconviction court’s ruling was final, and it affected only his sentence — not the underlying 1985 conviction. ¶ 20 To the extent that Martinez also argues that his 1985 conviction doesn’t qualify as a crime of violence, we disagree. ¶ 21 The relevant question under subsection (3.5)(a) is whether Martinez was previously convicted of an offense that “would have been a crime of violence as | 1 | 1 |
Martinez v. Colorado State Board of Parolegreen1 sentence2026See People v. Sa’ra, 117 P.3d 51, 56 (Colo. App. 2004) (“A court may take judicial notice of the contents of court records in a related proceeding.”). 9 a crime of violence, not that the offender was convicted of a separate crime of violence count), overruled on other grounds by, Meredith v. Zavaras, 954 P.2d 597 (Colo. 1998); Martinez v. Colo. State Bd. of Parole, 989 P.2d 256, 257-58 (Colo. App. 1999) (same). ¶ 22 As relevant here, section 18-1.3-406(2)(a)(I)(A), (II)(F) defines a crime of violence to include an aggravated robbery where the offender “[u]sed, or possessed and threatened the u | 1 | 1 |
Meredith v. Zavarasgreen1 sentence2026See People v. Sa’ra, 117 P.3d 51, 56 (Colo. App. 2004) (“A court may take judicial notice of the contents of court records in a related proceeding.”). 9 a crime of violence, not that the offender was convicted of a separate crime of violence count), overruled on other grounds by, Meredith v. Zavaras, 954 P.2d 597 (Colo. 1998); Martinez v. Colo. State Bd. of Parole, 989 P.2d 256, 257-58 (Colo. App. 1999) (same). ¶ 22 As relevant here, section 18-1.3-406(2)(a)(I)(A), (II)(F) defines a crime of violence to include an aggravated robbery where the offender “[u]sed, or possessed and threatened the u | 1 | 1 |
People v. Sa'Ragreen1 sentence2026See People v. Sa’ra, 117 P.3d 51, 56 (Colo. App. 2004) (“A court may take judicial notice of the contents of court records in a related proceeding.”). 9 a crime of violence, not that the offender was convicted of a separate crime of violence count), overruled on other grounds by, Meredith v. Zavaras, 954 P.2d 597 (Colo. 1998); Martinez v. Colo. State Bd. of Parole, 989 P.2d 256, 257-58 (Colo. App. 1999) (same). ¶ 22 As relevant here, section 18-1.3-406(2)(a)(I)(A), (II)(F) defines a crime of violence to include an aggravated robbery where the offender “[u]sed, or possessed and threatened the u | 1 | 1 |
People v. Stewartgreen1 sentence2020Standard of Review ¶ 25 We review for an abuse of discretion a trial court’s evidentiary rulings, People v. Stewart, 55 P.3d 107, 122 (Colo. 2002), as well as its denial of a motion for mistrial, People v. Santana, 255 P.3d 1126, 1130 (Colo. 2011). | 1 | 1 |
Hagos v. Peoplegreen1 sentence2020See Hagos, ¶ 14, 288 P.3d at 120 . | 1 | 1 |
People v. Santanagreen1 sentence2020Standard of Review ¶ 25 We review for an abuse of discretion a trial court’s evidentiary rulings, People v. Stewart, 55 P.3d 107, 122 (Colo. 2002), as well as its denial of a motion for mistrial, People v. Santana, 255 P.3d 1126, 1130 (Colo. 2011). | 1 | 1 |
People Ex Rel. J.R.T. v. Martinezgreen2 sentences2018See 70 P.3d at 480 . 2018See 70 P.3d at 480 . | 1 | 1 |
Trinity Broadcasting of Denver, Inc. v. City of Westminstergreen1 sentence2016See Trinity Broad. of Denver v. City of Westminster, 848 P.2d 916, 924-25 (Colo.1998); Finnie v. Jefferson Cty. | 1 | 1 |
City of Lakewood v. Bracegreen1 sentence2014As a result, Officer Martinez’s motion was not properly brought under C.R.C.P. 12(b)(1). ¶ 13 In his reply brief, Officer Martinez concedes that generally a determination of immunity based on alleged willful and wanton conduct must be decided at trial, but asserts that Brace “provides an important exception.” The claimed exception would “allow[ ] an interlocutory appeal where there are no disputed 'issues of fact material to the allegation of the public employee’s willful and wanton conduct.” Brace , however, does not say that. ¶ 14, Officer Martinez points to language in Brace that a determin | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Garner v. People
green
2 sentences2024Garner v. People, 2019 CO 19, ¶ 5 . ¶ 24 Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court did not err by not applying the Martinez factors when considering Horton’s motion for judgment of acquittal. 2024Garner v. People, 2019 CO 19, ¶ 5 . ¶ 24 Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court did not err by not applying the Martinez factors when considering Horton’s motion for judgment of acquittal. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
DeBELLA v. People
green
2 sentences2017Nor do we perceive a material risk to the fairness of Martinez’s trial. ¶30 First, although inconsistencies between a victim’s recorded statement and his or her account at trial are “almost always present” in cases involving charges of sexual assault on a child, DeBella, 233 P.3d at 669 , Martinez’s defense did not rely to any significant extent on such inconsistencies to challenge the victims’ credibility in the present case. 2017Nor do we perceive a material risk to the fairness of Martinez’s trial. ¶30 First, although inconsistencies between a victim’s recorded statement and his or her account at trial are “almost always present” in cases involving charges of sexual assault on a child, DeBella, 233 P.3d at 669 , Martinez’s defense did not rely to any significant extent on such inconsistencies to challenge the victims’ credibility in the present case. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
United States v. Frank Martinez
green
2 sentences1989Id. at 865 . 1989Id. at 865 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.