Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1912–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Hintongreen2 sentences2019See also, e.g. , People v. Hinton , 402 Ill. 2019See also, e.g., People v. Hinton, 402 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Taylorgreen1 sentence2025People v. Ratliff, 65 Ill. 2d 314, 318 (1976); People v. Taylor, 2013 IL App (2d) 110577, ¶ 26 (discussing 720 ILCS 5/32-10 (2010)). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Ratliffgreen1 sentence2025People v. Ratliff, 65 Ill. 2d 314, 318 (1976); People v. Taylor, 2013 IL App (2d) 110577, ¶ 26 (discussing 720 ILCS 5/32-10 (2010)). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Minefeegreen1 sentence2024App. 3d 322, 324 (1975) (“A bail bond violation occurs even if the underlying charge is later declared invalid.”); People v. Minefee, 14 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Tompkinsgreen1 sentence2024See 725 ILCS 5/32–10(a-5) (West 2020) (“Any person who knowingly violates a condition of bail bond by possessing a firearm in violation of his or her conditions of bail commits a Class 4 felony for a first violation and a Class 3 felony for a second or subsequent violation.”); see also cases discussing the criminal offense of violation of bail bond—People v. Tompkins, 26 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Cathey
green
2 sentences2020People v. Cathey, 2012 IL 111746, ¶ 17 . 2020People v. Cathey, 2012 IL 111746, ¶ 17 , 965 N.E.2d 1109 . | 2 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Luciano
neutral
1 sentence2023A postconviction proceeding allows an individual convicted of a criminal offense to challenge his or her conviction on the grounds of a - 17 - 2023 IL App (2d) 220112 constitutional violation. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Domagala
green
1 sentence2023People v. Domagala, 2013 IL 113688, ¶ 32 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Cathey
green
1 sentence2020People v. Cathey, 2012 IL 111746, ¶ 17 , 965 N.E.2d 1109 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Board of Education v. Johnson
green
1 sentence1991App. 3d 482 , 315 N.E.2d 634 .) Thus, the Illinois Supreme Court’s holding in Whitlow was limited; Whitlow held that an allegation of “intent” was not required to state a criminal offense for violation of sections 12(F) and 12(G) and that an allegation that defendants acted “knowingly and deliberately” alleged a mental state sufficient to state a criminal violation of sections 12(F) and 12(G). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
People v. Hall
green
1 sentence1959(People v. Hall, 413 Ill. 615 .) The knowing use of perjured testimony by the State in a prosecution for a criminal offense is a violation of the accused’s rights under both the Federal and State constitutions and proof of such violation in a proceeding under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act will justify relief under the act. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
People v. Jennings
green
1 sentence1959(People v. Wakat, 415 Ill. 610 ; People v. Jennings, 411 Ill. 21 .) The evidence in support of the charge consisted of Matthews’s testimony that he had lied at the original trial under pressure from the assistant State’s Attorney and Wyatt’s testimony, which, to some extent, provided corroboration of Matthews’s testimony. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
People v. Wakat
green
1 sentence1959(People v. Wakat, 415 Ill. 610 ; People v. Jennings, 411 Ill. 21 .) The evidence in support of the charge consisted of Matthews’s testimony that he had lied at the original trial under pressure from the assistant State’s Attorney and Wyatt’s testimony, which, to some extent, provided corroboration of Matthews’s testimony. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Miller v. Balthasser
neutral
1 sentence1912Miller v. Balthasser, 78 Ill. 302 ; Woods v. Dailey, 211 Ill. 495 ; People v. Sullivan, 218 Ill. 419 ; McInturff v. Ins. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Woods v. Dailey
neutral
1 sentence1912Miller v. Balthasser, 78 Ill. 302 ; Woods v. Dailey, 211 Ill. 495 ; People v. Sullivan, 218 Ill. 419 ; McInturff v. Ins. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
People ex rel. Deneen v. Sullivan
neutral
1 sentence1912Miller v. Balthasser, 78 Ill. 302 ; Woods v. Dailey, 211 Ill. 495 ; People v. Sullivan, 218 Ill. 419 ; McInturff v. Ins. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.