Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Davis v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2025Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229, 236-37 (2011). 2021Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229, 236-37 (2011). | 4 | 5 |
Arizona v. Evansgreen1 sentence2021Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1, 10-11 (1995). ¶ 27 A trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress evidence is subject to a dual standard of review. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Manzo
green
2 sentences2021Manzo, 2018 IL 122761 , ¶ 67. ¶ 110 Because there is no constitutional right to the suppression of illegally obtained evidence, the judicially created exclusionary rule is to be applied only where its benefits outweigh its social costs. 2021Manzo, 2018 IL 122761 , ¶ 67. ¶ 110 Because there is no constitutional right to the suppression of illegally obtained evidence, the judicially created exclusionary rule is to be applied only where its benefits outweigh its social costs. | 3 | 2021–2021 |
Illinois v. Krull
green
2 sentences2008Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340, 347 , 94 L. 2008Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340, 347 , 94 L. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
King v. Ryan
green
2 sentences1994(See King, 153 Ill. 2d at 462-65 .) We believe any further expansion of the Krull good-faith exception would emasculate the judicially created exclusionary rule independently applied in Illinois for more than 70 years to remedy violations of our citizens’ right to privacy and freedom from unlawful searches and seizures guaranteed by the Illinois Constitution. 1994(See King, 153 Ill.2d at 462-65 , 180 Ill.Dec. 260 , 607 N.E.2d 154 .) We believe any further expansion of the Krull good-faith exception would emasculate the judicially created exclusionary rule independently applied in Illinois for more than 70 years to remedy violations of our citizens' right to privacy and freedom from unlawful searches and seizures guaranteed by the Illinois Constitution. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Mapp v. Ohio
green
2 sentences1994The rule was adopted in Illinois by our supreme court long before Mapp v. Ohio (1961), 367 U.S. 643 , 6 L. 1994The rule was adopted in Illinois by our supreme court long before Mapp v. Ohio (1961), 367 U.S. 643 , 6 L. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
People v. Peterson
green
2 sentences1993In refusing to suppress the illegally seized evidence in Dowery, the supreme court focused on the limited deterrent purposes of the judicially created exclusionary rule in fourth amendment cases. ( 62 Ill. 2d at 204-07 , 340 N.E.2d at 531-33 .) However, in People v. Peterson (1978), 74 Ill. 2d 478 , 384 N.E.2d 348 , the supreme court observed that considerations other than deterrence are involved in cases arising under the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination. ( 74 Ill. 2d at 484 , 384 N.E.2d at 351 .) As a general rule, the Peterson court found that “the sanctity of the person 1993In refusing to suppress the illegally seized evidence in Dowery, the supreme court focused on the limited deterrent purposes of the judicially created exclusionary rule in fourth amendment cases. ( 62 Ill. 2d at 204-07 , 340 N.E.2d at 531-33 .) However, in People v. Peterson (1978), 74 Ill. 2d 478 , 384 N.E.2d 348 , the supreme court observed that considerations other than deterrence are involved in cases arising under the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination. ( 74 Ill. 2d at 484 , 384 N.E.2d at 351 .) As a general rule, the Peterson court found that “the sanctity of the person | 1 | 1993–1993 |
People v. Dowery
green
2 sentences1993In refusing to suppress the illegally seized evidence in Dowery, the supreme court focused on the limited deterrent purposes of the judicially created exclusionary rule in fourth amendment cases. ( 62 Ill. 2d at 204-07 , 340 N.E.2d at 531-33 .) However, in People v. Peterson (1978), 74 Ill. 2d 478 , 384 N.E.2d 348 , the supreme court observed that considerations other than deterrence are involved in cases arising under the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination. ( 74 Ill. 2d at 484 , 384 N.E.2d at 351 .) As a general rule, the Peterson court found that “the sanctity of the person 1993In refusing to suppress the illegally seized evidence in Dowery, the supreme court focused on the limited deterrent purposes of the judicially created exclusionary rule in fourth amendment cases. ( 62 Ill. 2d at 204-07 , 340 N.E.2d at 531-33 .) However, in People v. Peterson (1978), 74 Ill. 2d 478 , 384 N.E.2d 348 , the supreme court observed that considerations other than deterrence are involved in cases arising under the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination. ( 74 Ill. 2d at 484 , 384 N.E.2d at 351 .) As a general rule, the Peterson court found that “the sanctity of the person | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.