10 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tunstill v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See Wallace v. State, 725 N.E.2d 837, 840 (Ind.2000) (discussing the State’s burden in the context of an analogous self-defense claim); Tunstill v. State, 568 N.E.2d 539, 541 (Ind.1991) (“Where the issue of self-defense is asserted by a defendant and finds support in the evidence, the State then has the burden of negating the presence of one or more of the necessary elements of the defense.... ”). 2008See Wallace v. State, 725 N.E.2d 837, 840 (Ind.2000) (discussing the State’s burden in the context of an analogous self-defense claim); Tunstill v. State, 568 N.E.2d 539, 541 (Ind.1991) (“Where the issue of self-defense is asserted by a defendant and finds support in the evidence, the State then has the burden of negating the presence of one or more of the necessary elements of the defense .... ”). | 2 | 2 |
Wallace v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See Wallace v. State, 725 N.E.2d 837, 840 (Ind.2000) (discussing the State’s burden in the context of an analogous self-defense claim); Tunstill v. State, 568 N.E.2d 539, 541 (Ind.1991) (“Where the issue of self-defense is asserted by a defendant and finds support in the evidence, the State then has the burden of negating the presence of one or more of the necessary elements of the defense.... ”). 2008See Wallace v. State, 725 N.E.2d 837, 840 (Ind.2000) (discussing the State’s burden in the context of an analogous self-defense claim); Tunstill v. State, 568 N.E.2d 539, 541 (Ind.1991) (“Where the issue of self-defense is asserted by a defendant and finds support in the evidence, the State then has the burden of negating the presence of one or more of the necessary elements of the defense .... ”). | 2 | 2 |
Letson v. Lowmastergreen2 sentences1982McKeown v. Calusa (1977), 172 Ind.App. 1 , *431 359 N.E.2d 550, 553 ; see also Letson v. Lowmaster (1976), 168 Ind.App. 159 , 341 N.E.2d 785 . 1982McKeown v. Calusa (1977), 172 Ind.App. 1 , *431 359 N.E.2d 550, 553 ; see also Letson v. Lowmaster (1976), 168 Ind.App. 159 , 341 N.E.2d 785 . | 2 | 2 |
Senco Products, Inc. v. Rileygreen2 sentences1986When a verdict for the plaintiff “could only have been based on surmise, conjecture or speculation as to one or more of the necessary elements of the claim[, it] should not be permitted to stand.” Id. 434 N.E.2d at 567 . 1986When a verdict for the plaintiff “could only have been based on surmise, conjecture or speculation as to one or more of the necessary elements of the claim[, it] should not be permitted to stand.” Id. 434 N.E.2d at 567 . | 1 | 3 |
Davidson v. Baileygreen1 sentence2008In order to support a claim of negligent entrustment regarding a vehicle, a plaintiff must demonstrate that another: “(1) entrusted her car; (2) to an incapacitated person or one who is incapable of using due care; (3) with actual and specific knowledge that the person is incapacitated or incapable of using due care at the time of the entrustment; (4) proximate cause; and (5) damages.” Davidson v. Bailey, 826 N.E.2d 80, 88 (Ind.Ct.App.2005). | 1 | 1 |
Executive Builders, Inc. v. Trislergreen1 sentence2008Cf. Executive Builders, Inc. v. Trisler, 741 N.E.2d 351, 356 (Ind.Ct.App.2000) (holding trial court properly denied a motion to amend where evidence was not introduced to support all the necessary elements of the claim sought to be added), trans. denied, cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1081 , 122 S.Ct. 814 , 151 L.Ed.2d 698 (2002). | 1 | 1 |
Berg v. Glinosgreen1 sentence1989Huff, supra; Tancos, supra; Senco Products, Inc. v. Riley (1982), Ind.App., 434 N.E.2d 561 ; see also Berg v. Glinos (1989), Ind.App., 538 N.E.2d 979 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McKeown v. Calusa
green
2 sentences1982McKeown v. Calusa (1977), 172 Ind.App. 1 , *431 359 N.E.2d 550, 553 ; see also Letson v. Lowmaster (1976), 168 Ind.App. 159 , 341 N.E.2d 785 . 1982McKeown v. Calusa (1977), 172 Ind.App. 1 , *431 359 N.E.2d 550, 553 ; see also Letson v. Lowmaster (1976), 168 Ind.App. 159 , 341 N.E.2d 785 . | 2 | 1982–1982 |
Lincke v. Long Beach Country Club
green
1 sentence2011As authority, the Elks cited a case strikingly similar to the present one, Linche v. Long Beach Country Club, 702 N.E.2d 738 (Ind.Ct. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Gaudelli v. Eisner
green
1 sentence2008Cf. Executive Builders, Inc. v. Trisler, 741 N.E.2d 351, 356 (Ind.Ct.App.2000) (holding trial court properly denied a motion to amend where evidence was not introduced to support all the necessary elements of the claim sought to be added), trans. denied, cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1081 , 122 S.Ct. 814 , 151 L.Ed.2d 698 (2002). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Greene v. Imagine Entertainment
green
1 sentence2008Cf. Executive Builders, Inc. v. Trisler, 741 N.E.2d 351, 356 (Ind.Ct.App.2000) (holding trial court properly denied a motion to amend where evidence was not introduced to support all the necessary elements of the claim sought to be added), trans. denied, cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1081 , 122 S.Ct. 814 , 151 L.Ed.2d 698 (2002). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Hostin v. Arizona Schools for the Deaf & Blind
green
1 sentence2008Cf. Executive Builders, Inc. v. Trisler, 741 N.E.2d 351, 356 (Ind.Ct.App.2000) (holding trial court properly denied a motion to amend where evidence was not introduced to support all the necessary elements of the claim sought to be added), trans. denied, cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1081 , 122 S.Ct. 814 , 151 L.Ed.2d 698 (2002). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Johnson v. State
green
2 sentences1991Ashford v. State (1984), Ind., 464 N.E.2d 1298 ; Johnson v. State (1971), 256 Ind. 579 , 271 N.E.2d 123 . 1991Ashford v. State (1984), Ind., 464 N.E.2d 1298 ; Johnson v. State (1971), 256 Ind. 579 , 271 N.E.2d 123 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Ashford v. State
green
2 sentences1991Ashford v. State (1984), Ind., 464 N.E.2d 1298 ; Johnson v. State (1971), 256 Ind. 579 , 271 N.E.2d 123 . 1991Ashford v. State (1984), Ind., 464 N.E.2d 1298 ; Johnson v. State (1971), 256 Ind. 579 , 271 N.E.2d 123 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.