necessary elements claim (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

necessary elements claim in Indiana

10 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
Tunstill v. Stategreen
ind · 1991 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2011
2 sentences

2011See Wallace v. State, 725 N.E.2d 837, 840 (Ind.2000) (discussing the State’s burden in the context of an analogous self-defense claim); Tunstill v. State, 568 N.E.2d 539, 541 (Ind.1991) (“Where the issue of self-defense is asserted by a defendant and finds support in the evidence, the State then has the burden of negating the presence of one or more of the necessary elements of the defense.... ”).

2008See Wallace v. State, 725 N.E.2d 837, 840 (Ind.2000) (discussing the State’s burden in the context of an analogous self-defense claim); Tunstill v. State, 568 N.E.2d 539, 541 (Ind.1991) (“Where the issue of self-defense is asserted by a defendant and finds support in the evidence, the State then has the burden of negating the presence of one or more of the necessary elements of the defense .... ”).

22
Wallace v. Stategreen
ind · 2000 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2011
2 sentences

2011See Wallace v. State, 725 N.E.2d 837, 840 (Ind.2000) (discussing the State’s burden in the context of an analogous self-defense claim); Tunstill v. State, 568 N.E.2d 539, 541 (Ind.1991) (“Where the issue of self-defense is asserted by a defendant and finds support in the evidence, the State then has the burden of negating the presence of one or more of the necessary elements of the defense.... ”).

2008See Wallace v. State, 725 N.E.2d 837, 840 (Ind.2000) (discussing the State’s burden in the context of an analogous self-defense claim); Tunstill v. State, 568 N.E.2d 539, 541 (Ind.1991) (“Where the issue of self-defense is asserted by a defendant and finds support in the evidence, the State then has the burden of negating the presence of one or more of the necessary elements of the defense .... ”).

22
Letson v. Lowmastergreen
indctapp · 1976 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982
2 sentences

1982McKeown v. Calusa (1977), 172 Ind.App. 1 , *431 359 N.E.2d 550, 553 ; see also Letson v. Lowmaster (1976), 168 Ind.App. 159 , 341 N.E.2d 785 .

1982McKeown v. Calusa (1977), 172 Ind.App. 1 , *431 359 N.E.2d 550, 553 ; see also Letson v. Lowmaster (1976), 168 Ind.App. 159 , 341 N.E.2d 785 .

22
Senco Products, Inc. v. Rileygreen
indctapp · 1982 · cited in 3 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1986–1989
2 sentences

1986When a verdict for the plaintiff “could only have been based on surmise, conjecture or speculation as to one or more of the necessary elements of the claim[, it] should not be permitted to stand.” Id. 434 N.E.2d at 567 .

1986When a verdict for the plaintiff “could only have been based on surmise, conjecture or speculation as to one or more of the necessary elements of the claim[, it] should not be permitted to stand.” Id. 434 N.E.2d at 567 .

13
Davidson v. Baileygreen
indctapp · 2005 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008In order to support a claim of negligent entrustment regarding a vehicle, a plaintiff must demonstrate that another: “(1) entrusted her car; (2) to an incapacitated person or one who is incapable of using due care; (3) with actual and specific knowledge that the person is incapacitated or incapable of using due care at the time of the entrustment; (4) proximate cause; and (5) damages.” Davidson v. Bailey, 826 N.E.2d 80, 88 (Ind.Ct.App.2005).

11
Executive Builders, Inc. v. Trislergreen
indctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008Cf. Executive Builders, Inc. v. Trisler, 741 N.E.2d 351, 356 (Ind.Ct.App.2000) (holding trial court properly denied a motion to amend where evidence was not introduced to support all the necessary elements of the claim sought to be added), trans. denied, cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1081 , 122 S.Ct. 814 , 151 L.Ed.2d 698 (2002).

11
Berg v. Glinosgreen
indctapp · 1989 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989
1 sentence

1989Huff, supra; Tancos, supra; Senco Products, Inc. v. Riley (1982), Ind.App., 434 N.E.2d 561 ; see also Berg v. Glinos (1989), Ind.App., 538 N.E.2d 979 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
McKeown v. Calusa green
indctapp · 1977
2 sentences

1982McKeown v. Calusa (1977), 172 Ind.App. 1 , *431 359 N.E.2d 550, 553 ; see also Letson v. Lowmaster (1976), 168 Ind.App. 159 , 341 N.E.2d 785 .

1982McKeown v. Calusa (1977), 172 Ind.App. 1 , *431 359 N.E.2d 550, 553 ; see also Letson v. Lowmaster (1976), 168 Ind.App. 159 , 341 N.E.2d 785 .

21982–1982
Lincke v. Long Beach Country Club green
indctapp · 1998
1 sentence

2011As authority, the Elks cited a case strikingly similar to the present one, Linche v. Long Beach Country Club, 702 N.E.2d 738 (Ind.Ct.

12011–2011
Gaudelli v. Eisner green
scotus · 2002
1 sentence

2008Cf. Executive Builders, Inc. v. Trisler, 741 N.E.2d 351, 356 (Ind.Ct.App.2000) (holding trial court properly denied a motion to amend where evidence was not introduced to support all the necessary elements of the claim sought to be added), trans. denied, cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1081 , 122 S.Ct. 814 , 151 L.Ed.2d 698 (2002).

12008–2008
Greene v. Imagine Entertainment green
scotus · 2002
1 sentence

2008Cf. Executive Builders, Inc. v. Trisler, 741 N.E.2d 351, 356 (Ind.Ct.App.2000) (holding trial court properly denied a motion to amend where evidence was not introduced to support all the necessary elements of the claim sought to be added), trans. denied, cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1081 , 122 S.Ct. 814 , 151 L.Ed.2d 698 (2002).

12008–2008
Hostin v. Arizona Schools for the Deaf & Blind green
scotus · 2002
1 sentence

2008Cf. Executive Builders, Inc. v. Trisler, 741 N.E.2d 351, 356 (Ind.Ct.App.2000) (holding trial court properly denied a motion to amend where evidence was not introduced to support all the necessary elements of the claim sought to be added), trans. denied, cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1081 , 122 S.Ct. 814 , 151 L.Ed.2d 698 (2002).

12008–2008
Johnson v. State green
ind · 1971
2 sentences

1991Ashford v. State (1984), Ind., 464 N.E.2d 1298 ; Johnson v. State (1971), 256 Ind. 579 , 271 N.E.2d 123 .

1991Ashford v. State (1984), Ind., 464 N.E.2d 1298 ; Johnson v. State (1971), 256 Ind. 579 , 271 N.E.2d 123 .

11991–1991
Ashford v. State green
ind · 1984
2 sentences

1991Ashford v. State (1984), Ind., 464 N.E.2d 1298 ; Johnson v. State (1971), 256 Ind. 579 , 271 N.E.2d 123 .

1991Ashford v. State (1984), Ind., 464 N.E.2d 1298 ; Johnson v. State (1971), 256 Ind. 579 , 271 N.E.2d 123 .

11991–1991

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IN § Ind. Code § 35-42-2-1 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NV 22 (1992–2023) CA 17 (1934–2021) NC 17 (1964–2018) OH 14 (1990–2018) TX 10 (1982–2015) IN 10 (1982–2011) FL 8 (1981–2025) NY 6 (1986–2025) CT 6 (1994–2002) PA 5 (1971–2023) LA 4 (1963–2018) ID 4 (2016–2024) TN 4 (1995–2018) GA 3 (1978–1986) OR 3 (2002–2013) MO 3 (1990–2012) WY 3 (1969–1999) IL 2 (1989–2025) MA 2 (1979–2013) MN 2 (1980–2009) WA 2 (2005–2005) KY 2 (1964–2020) VA 2 (1971–2004) MI 2 (2016–2020) ND 2 (1992–2012) RI 2 (1996–2009) DE 2 (2018–2018)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check