10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sakowitz, Inc. v. Steckgreen2 sentences1988Sakowitz, Inc. v. Steck, 669 S.W.2d 105 (Tex.1984). 1987The majority opinion in Sakowitz, Inc. v. Steck, supra at 107, stated: To establish the necessary elements for her claim of tortious interference, Steck [plaintiff] had to show (1) that the defendant maliciously interfered with the contractual relationship, (2) without legal justification or excuse. | 3 | 4 |
State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. Paynegreen1 sentence2015See id. | 1 | 1 |
Bank of Texas v. VR Electric, Inc.green1 sentence2015While there is an exception to this rule when the evidence conclusively establishes the necessary elements of a claim, Bank of Tex. v. VR Electric, Inc., 276 S.W.3d 671, 677 (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] 2008, pet. denied), such is not the case here. | 1 | 1 |
Quinones v. Pin Ex Rel. Pingreen1 sentence2010See generally Quinones, 298 S.W.3d at 810 (“To constitute an objective, good-faith effort, the report must inform the defendant of the specific conduct the plaintiff has called into question, and the report must provide a basis for the trial judge to conclude the claims have merit.”). | 1 | 1 |
Terry v. Zachrygreen2 sentences1984Terry v. Zachry, 272 S.W.2d 157, 159 (Tex.Civ.App. San Antonio 1954, writ ref'd n.r.e.). 1984Terry v. Zachry, 272 S.W.2d 157, 159 (Tex.Civ.App.—San Antonio 1954, writ ref’d n.r.e.). | 1 | 1 |
Erickson v. Deayalagreen1 sentence1983See Erickson v. Deayala, 627 S.W.2d 475 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1981, no writ), where the court *230 pointed out that since inferential rebuttal issues are prohibited by Rule 277, if there is some evidence of “sudden emergency,” the defendant is entitled to a suitable explanatory instruction or definition. | 1 | 1 |
Oilwell Division, United States Steel Corp. v. Fryergreen2 sentences1982Oil Well Division, United States Steel Corp. v. Fryer, 493 S.W.2d 487, 490 (Tex.1973). 1982Oil Well Division, United States Steel Corp. v. Fryer, 493 S.W.2d 487, 490 (Tex.1973). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.