necessary elements claim in Connecticut

6 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2002 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

Case	Followed	Cited
cluster 711127green ca3 · 1996 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 1 sentence 2002See DeMarco's memorandum of law, pp. 14-15. "[W]hen the nonmoving party will bear the burden of proof at trial, the moving party may meet its burden by showing that the nonmoving party has not offered evidence sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to its case." In re Unisys Savings Plan Litigation , 74 F.3d 420 , 433 (3d Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 810 , 117 S.Ct. 56 , 136 L.Ed.2d 19 (1996). "[R]ecovery for unintentionally-caused emotional distress does not depend on proof of either an ensuing physical injury or a risk of harm from physical impact. . . . [R]ather	1	1
Perodeau v. City of Hartfordgreen conn · 2002 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 2 sentences 2002See DeMarco's memorandum of law, pp. 14-15. "[W]hen the nonmoving party will bear the burden of proof at trial, the moving party may meet its burden by showing that the nonmoving party has not offered evidence sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to its case." In re Unisys Savings Plan Litigation , 74 F.3d 420 , 433 (3d Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 810 , 117 S.Ct. 56 , 136 L.Ed.2d 19 (1996). "[R]ecovery for unintentionally-caused emotional distress does not depend on proof of either an ensuing physical injury or a risk of harm from physical impact. . . . [R]ather 2002See DeMarco's memorandum of law, pp. 14-15. "[W]hen the nonmoving party will bear the burden of proof at trial, the moving party may meet its burden by showing that the nonmoving party has not offered evidence sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to its case." In re Unisys Savings Plan Litigation , 74 F.3d 420 , 433 (3d Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 810 , 117 S.Ct. 56 , 136 L.Ed.2d 19 (1996). "[R]ecovery for unintentionally-caused emotional distress does not depend on proof of either an ensuing physical injury or a risk of harm from physical impact. . . . [R]ather	1	1
Nesson v. McIntyregreen scotus · 1996 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 1 sentence 2002See DeMarco's memorandum of law, pp. 14-15. "[W]hen the nonmoving party will bear the burden of proof at trial, the moving party may meet its burden by showing that the nonmoving party has not offered evidence sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to its case." In re Unisys Savings Plan Litigation , 74 F.3d 420 , 433 (3d Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 810 , 117 S.Ct. 56 , 136 L.Ed.2d 19 (1996). "[R]ecovery for unintentionally-caused emotional distress does not depend on proof of either an ensuing physical injury or a risk of harm from physical impact. . . . [R]ather	1	1
Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fundgreen scotus · 1996 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 1 sentence 2002See DeMarco's memorandum of law, pp. 14-15. "[W]hen the nonmoving party will bear the burden of proof at trial, the moving party may meet its burden by showing that the nonmoving party has not offered evidence sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to its case." In re Unisys Savings Plan Litigation , 74 F.3d 420 , 433 (3d Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 810 , 117 S.Ct. 56 , 136 L.Ed.2d 19 (1996). "[R]ecovery for unintentionally-caused emotional distress does not depend on proof of either an ensuing physical injury or a risk of harm from physical impact. . . . [R]ather	1	1
McDonnell v. United Statesgreen scotus · 1996 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 1 sentence 2002See DeMarco's memorandum of law, pp. 14-15. "[W]hen the nonmoving party will bear the burden of proof at trial, the moving party may meet its burden by showing that the nonmoving party has not offered evidence sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to its case." In re Unisys Savings Plan Litigation , 74 F.3d 420 , 433 (3d Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 810 , 117 S.Ct. 56 , 136 L.Ed.2d 19 (1996). "[R]ecovery for unintentionally-caused emotional distress does not depend on proof of either an ensuing physical injury or a risk of harm from physical impact. . . . [R]ather	1	1
Clohessy v. Bachelorgreen conn · 1996 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000 2 sentences 2000See Clohessy v. Bachelor, 237 Conn. 31 , 33 n.4, 675 A.2d 852 (1996) (“[w]hat is necessarily implied [in an allegation] need not be expressly alleged”). 2000See Clohessy v. Bachelor, 237 Conn. 31 , 33 n.4, 675 A.2d 852 (1996) (“[w]hat is necessarily implied [in an allegation] need not be expressly alleged”).	1	1
Dorsey v. Mancusogreen connappct · 1990 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995 1 sentence 1995See Dorsey v. Mancuso, 23 Conn. App. 629 , 633 (1990).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

Case	Cited	Years
Fields v. Kichar, No. Cv 9454868s (May 2, 1995) neutral connsuperct · 1995 1 sentence 1996However, several superior courts have concluded that "[i]n order to establish a claim for unreasonable intrusion upon the seclusion of another, the plaintiffs must prove an intentional physical intrusion [by the defendant] upon the private affairs or concerns of the plaintiffs which would be highly offensive to a reasonable person." See Fields v. Kichar, Superior Court, judicial district of Tolland at Rockville, Docket No. 054868 (May 2, 1995, Klaczak, J., 14 Conn. L.	1	1996–1996
Atkinson v. Berloni green connappct · 1990 1 sentence 1995They allege that the third-party plaintiff has pleaded active-passive negligence and that the controlling case in that area is Atkinson v. Berloni , 23 Conn. App. 325 (1990).	1	1995–1995
Blake v. Levy green conn · 1983 2 sentences 1994The plaintiff argues that count five is sufficient because the prior action did terminate in favor of the plaintiff. "[A] claim for vexatious litigations requiries [requires] a CT Page 11322 plaintiff to allege that the previous lawsuit was initiated maliciously, without probable cause, and terminated in the plaintiff's favor." Blake v. Levy, 191 Conn. 257 , 263 , 464 A.2d 52 (1983). 1994The plaintiff argues that count five is sufficient because the prior action did terminate in favor of the plaintiff. "[A] claim for vexatious litigations requiries [requires] a CT Page 11322 plaintiff to allege that the previous lawsuit was initiated maliciously, without probable cause, and terminated in the plaintiff's favor." Blake v. Levy, 191 Conn. 257 , 263 , 464 A.2d 52 (1983).	1	1994–1994

Where else courts name it

NV 22 (1992–2023) CA 17 (1934–2021) NC 17 (1964–2018) OH 14 (1990–2018) TX 10 (1982–2015) IN 10 (1982–2011) FL 8 (1981–2025) NY 6 (1986–2025) CT 6 (1994–2002) PA 5 (1971–2023) LA 4 (1963–2018) ID 4 (2016–2024) TN 4 (1995–2018) GA 3 (1978–1986) OR 3 (2002–2013) MO 3 (1990–2012) WY 3 (1969–1999) IL 2 (1989–2025) MA 2 (1979–2013) MN 2 (1980–2009) WA 2 (2005–2005) KY 2 (1964–2020) VA 2 (1971–2004) MI 2 (2016–2020) ND 2 (1992–2012) RI 2 (1996–2009) DE 2 (2018–2018)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check