Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Parks v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Parks v. State, 734 N.E.2d 694, 700 (Ind.Ct.App.2000), trams. denied. 2004Parks v. State, 734 N.E.2d 694, 700 (Ind.Ct.App.2000), trans. demied. " To convict Robinson of resisting law enforcement, the State needed to prove that Robinson knowingly or intentionally forcibly resisted, obstructed, or interfered with Officer Taghon and Officer Jozaites while they were lawfully engaged in the execution of their duties as officers. | 2 | 2 |
Jackson v. Stategreen2 sentences2002Id. 1998Jackson v. State, 540 N.E.2d 1232, 1234 (Ind.1989). | 1 | 3 |
United States v. Haregreen1 sentence2005Spann v. State, 632 N.E.2d 741, 744 (Ind.Ct.App.1994); and see Umited States v. Hare, 153 F.2d 816, 819 (7th Cir.1946) (the fact a jury finds one party not guilty does not militate against a verdict of guilty as to a codefendant; "the determinative query is over the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict of guilt as to the codefendants who are appealing. | 1 | 1 |
Spann v. Stategreen1 sentence2005Spann v. State, 632 N.E.2d 741, 744 (Ind.Ct.App.1994); and see Umited States v. Hare, 153 F.2d 816, 819 (7th Cir.1946) (the fact a jury finds one party not guilty does not militate against a verdict of guilty as to a codefendant; "the determinative query is over the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict of guilt as to the codefendants who are appealing. | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Stategreen1 sentence2000Jones v. State, 689 N.E.2d 722, 724 (Ind.1997). “[0]rdinarily, when a defendant is acquitted of some charges and convicted of others, the results will survive a claim of [inconsistency where the convictions are supported by sufficient evidence.” Jordan v. State, 692 N.E.2d at 484 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cleasant v. State
green
1 sentence2005Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Jordan v. State
green
1 sentence2000Jones v. State, 689 N.E.2d 722, 724 (Ind.1997). “[0]rdinarily, when a defendant is acquitted of some charges and convicted of others, the results will survive a claim of [inconsistency where the convictions are supported by sufficient evidence.” Jordan v. State, 692 N.E.2d at 484 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Edwards v. State
green
1 sentence2000Id. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Totten v. State
green
1 sentence1989Totten v. State (1985), Ind., 486 N.E.2d 519 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |