Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Spaulding v. Harrisgreen2 sentences2016Techna-Fit, Inc. v. Fluid Transfer Prods., Inc., 45 N.E.3d 399, 411 (Ind.Ct.App.2015) (citing Spaulding v. Harris, 914 N.E.2d 820, 829-30 (Ind.Ct.App.2009), trans. denied). 2016Techna-Fit, Inc. v. Fluid Transfer Prods., Inc., 45 N.E.3d 399, 411 (Ind. Ct App. 2015) (citing Spaulding v. Harris, 914 N.E.2d 820, 829-30 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009), trans. denied). [26] Hi-Tech regional manager Catt stated that the ETG tests have the potential to be unreliable if environmental exposure to ethanol or ethanol containing products occurs. | 6 | 7 |
Techna-Fit, Inc. and Stuart Trotter v. Fluid Transfer Products, Inc.green2 sentences2016Techna-Fit, Inc. v. Fluid Transfer Prods., Inc., 45 N.E.3d 399, 411 (Ind.Ct.App.2015) (citing Spaulding v. Harris, 914 N.E.2d 820, 829-30 (Ind.Ct.App.2009), trans. denied). 2016Techna-Fit, Inc. v. Fluid Transfer Prods., Inc., 45 N.E.3d 399, 411 (Ind. Ct App. 2015) (citing Spaulding v. Harris, 914 N.E.2d 820, 829-30 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009), trans. denied). [26] Hi-Tech regional manager Catt stated that the ETG tests have the potential to be unreliable if environmental exposure to ethanol or ethanol containing products occurs. | 2 | 2 |
Speybroeck v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Speybroeck v. State, 875 N.E.2d 813, 818 (Ind.Ct.App.2007). . [27] Even if an evidentiary decision is an abuse of discretion', we will not reverse if the ruling constituted harmless error. 2016Speybroeck v. State, 875 N.E.2d 813, 818 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). [25] Even if an evidentiary decision is an abuse of discretion, we will not reverse if the ruling constituted harmless error. | 2 | 2 |
Decker v. Zenglergreen2 sentences2013Decker v. Zengler, 883 N.E.2d 839, 845 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008), reh’g denied, trans. denied. 2012Decker v. Zengler, 883 N.E.2d 839, 845 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008), reh’g denied, trans. denied. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
David L. Kimbrough v. Ramona F. Anderson
green
1 sentence2020An error is harmless when the probable impact of the erroneously admitted or excluded evidence on the factfinder, in light of all the evidence present, is sufficiently minor so as not to affect a party’s substantial rights. 55 N.E.3d at 334 . [29] Here, Mrs. Hurst testified that James Parker told her that “he was instructed [by Dow] to get what logs were already cut, even though he was told not to [by the Hursts].” Tr. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.