10 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Beckergreen2 sentences2012See State v. Becker, 290 Kan. 842, 856 , 235 P.3d 424 (2010) (appellate courts presume a jury followed jury instructions). 2012See State v. Becker, 290 Kan. 842, 856 , 235 P.3d 424 (2010) (appellate courts presume a jury followed jury instructions). | 2 | 3 |
State v. Lanegreen2 sentences2007See, e.g., State v. Lane, 262 Kan. 373, 391 , 940 P.2d 422 (1997) (Absent any contraiy evidence, it must be assumed that the jury followed this instruction, thus minimizing prejudice to the defendant.). 2007See, e.g., State v. Lane, 262 Kan. 373, 391 , 940 P.2d 422 (1997) (Absent any contraiy evidence, it must be assumed that the jury followed this instruction, thus minimizing prejudice to the defendant.). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Graygreen1 sentence2024See State v. Gray, 311 Kan. 164 , 172, 459 P.3d 165 (2020) ("[W]e presume jury members follow instructions."). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Racegreen2 sentences2015See State v. Race, 293 Kan. 69, 84 , 259 P.3d 707 (2011). 2015See State v. Race, 293 Kan. 69, 84 , 259 P.3d 707 (2011). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Barber
green
2 sentences2020State v. Barber, 302 Kan. 367, 383 , 353 P.3d 1108 (2015). 2020State v. Barber, 302 Kan. 367, 383 , 353 P.3d 1108 (2015). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Fleury
green
2 sentences1985State v. Fleury, 203 Kan. 888, 896 , 457 P.2d 44 (1969). 1985State v. Fleury, 203 Kan. 888, 896 , 457 P.2d 44 (1969). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Cameron & Bentley
green
1 sentence1985State v. Quinn, 219 Kan. 831, 837-38 , 549 P.2d 1000 (1976); State v. Cameron & Bentley, 216 Kan. at 648-49 . *677 Falke also argues that he was prejudiced by the admission of hearsay statements of Peggy Shrum asserted by defendant White. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Quinn
neutral
2 sentences1985State v. Quinn, 219 Kan. 831, 837-38 , 549 P.2d 1000 (1976); State v. Cameron & Bentley, 216 Kan. at 648-49 . *677 Falke also argues that he was prejudiced by the admission of hearsay statements of Peggy Shrum asserted by defendant White. 1985State v. Quinn, 219 Kan. 831, 837-38 , 549 P.2d 1000 (1976); State v. Cameron & Bentley, 216 Kan. at 648-49 . *677 Falke also argues that he was prejudiced by the admission of hearsay statements of Peggy Shrum asserted by defendant White. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.