5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2017–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thompson v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See Thompson, 308 Ga. at 860 . 2023See Thompson, 308 Ga. at 860 . | 2 | 2 |
Nundra v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See Nundra v. State, 316 Ga. 1, 8 ( 885 SE2d 790 ) (2023) (explaining that the trial court’s instruction that the jury could not infer from other-act evidence that the appellant was “‘of a character that would commit such crimes,’” lowered the risk that the jury would convict for the wrong reasons, even though the instruction “did not meaningfully explain for which permissible purpose the evidence was relevant”). 2023See Nundra v. State, 316 Ga. 1, 8 ( 885 SE2d 790 ) (2023) (explaining that the trial court’s instruction that the jury could not infer from other-act evidence that the appellant was “‘of a character that would commit such crimes,’” lowered the risk that the jury would convict for the wrong reasons, even though the instruction “did not meaningfully explain for which permissible purpose the evidence was relevant”). | 2 | 2 |
Dennis v. Stategreen2 sentences2017See Dennis v. State, 263 Ga. 257, 258 (2) ( 430 SE2d 742 ) (1993). 2017See Dennis v. State, 263 Ga. 257, 258 (2) ( 430 SE2d 742 ) (1993). | 2 | 2 |
Siler v. Blockgreen2 sentences2017See Dennis v. State, 263 Ga. 257, 258 (2) ( 430 SE2d 742 ) (1993). 2017See Dennis v. State, 263 Ga. 257, 258 (2) ( 430 SE2d 742 ) (1993). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rankin v. State
green
2 sentences2018Barnes, P. J., and McMillian, J., concur. 1 See OCGA §§ 16-6-4 (a) (1), (c) ; 16-6-22.2 (b); 16-6-3 (a). 2 See Rankin v. State , 278 Ga. 704 , 705, 606 S.E.2d 269 (2004). 3 To the extent this testimony constituted inadmissible hearsay or improper bolstering, Blackwell's trial counsel did not object to this testimony at trial, nor did Blackwell raise the failure to object as an ineffective assistance claim or raise this issue on appeal. 2018Barnes, P. J., and McMillian, J., concur. 1 See OCGA §§ 16-6-4 (a) (1), (c) ; 16-6-22.2 (b); 16-6-3 (a). 2 See Rankin v. State , 278 Ga. 704 , 705, 606 S.E.2d 269 (2004). 3 To the extent this testimony constituted inadmissible hearsay or improper bolstering, Blackwell's trial counsel did not object to this testimony at trial, nor did Blackwell raise the failure to object as an ineffective assistance claim or raise this issue on appeal. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.