Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1977–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Franklin v. Haughton Timber Co.green1 sentence2022Id. see also Franklin v. Haughton Timber Co., 377 So.2d 400, 406 (La. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hillman v. Comm-Care, Inc.
green
2 sentences2016“The four primary factors evidencing the right to control are: (1) selection and engagement; (2) payment of wages; (3) power of dismissal; and (4) power of control.” Wilfred , 2014-1121 at p. 5, 171 So.3d at 1011 (citing Hillman , 2001-1140 at p. 8, 805 So.2d at 1162 ). 2010Id. | 5 | 2006–2016 |
Boswell v. Kurthwood Manor Nursing Home
neutral
2 sentences2001Id. *613 None of these factors alone is determinative, but the totality of the circumstances must be considered. 1998Id. | 2 | 1998–2001 |
Course v. Fox Wolff Construction
green
1 sentence2022Id. see also Franklin v. Haughton Timber Co., 377 So.2d 400, 406 (La. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Wilfred v. A. Service Cab Co.
green
1 sentence2016“The four primary factors evidencing the right to control are: (1) selection and engagement; (2) payment of wages; (3) power of dismissal; and (4) power of control.” Wilfred , 2014-1121 at p. 5, 171 So.3d at 1011 (citing Hillman , 2001-1140 at p. 8, 805 So.2d at 1162 ). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Alexander v. JE Hixson & Sons Funeral Home
green
1 sentence2005Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Wambles v. State
green
1 sentence1977Judge Schott, in Wambles v. State, 283 So.2d 331 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1973), summarized the four primary factors to be considered in determining employee status: (1) selection and engagement; (2) payment of wages; (3) power of dismissal; and (4) control. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.