Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Massachusetts opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Massachusetts courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bridgeman v. District Attorney for the Suffolk Districtgreen1 sentence2023Based on concerns about "systemic misconduct in the Hinton Lab," on March 22, 2021, the Suffolk County District Attorney's office announced the "Hinton Lab Initiative," pledging to treat distribution count and two years of probation from and after that sentence on the possession count. 2 all defendants with convictions based on substances tested at Hinton lab between May 1, 2003, and August 30, 2012, as "List Two" defendants, as described in Bridgeman v. District Attorney for the Suffolk Dist., 476 Mass. 298, 327-328 (2017) (Bridgeman II), and on that basis, to seek to vacate and dismiss those | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Caldwellgreen2 sentences2019See Commonwealth v. Caldwell , 45 Mass. App. Ct. 42 , 46, 694 N.E.2d 1309 (1998). 2019See Commonwealth v. Caldwell , 45 Mass. App. Ct. 42 , 46, 694 N.E.2d 1309 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Morrisongreen1 sentence2017In addition, the defendant made no claim in 17 Morrison, 429 Mass. 511, 514 (1999) ("It is simply nonsense to say that society is prepared to recognize [a defendant's] right to be where [an abuse prevention order] has ordered him not to be"). | 1 | 1 |
Brady v. Marylandgreen1 sentence2002See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Fergusongreen1 sentence1999Citing Commonwealth v. Ferguson, 384 Mass. 13, 18 (1981), and Commonwealth v. Baptista, 32 Mass. App. Ct. 910 (1992),'the dissent seems to take the position, post at 496-497, that the defendant’s knowledge of the extended order cannot be inferred reasonably because that inference is itself based upon the inference that the defendant was served either by delivering a copy of the order to him in hand or by leaving it at his last and usual address. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Tuittgreen1 sentence1998See Commonwealth v. Tuitt, 393 Mass. 801, 810 (1985) (“ ‘the burden is on the defendant’ to come forward with evidence of a license”). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Lacygreen2 sentences1994Commonwealth v. Lacy, 371 Mass. 363, 370-371 (1976). 1994Commonwealth v. Lacy, 371 Mass. 363, 370-371 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Ballirogreen1 sentence1989Cf. Commonwealth v. Balliro, 349 Mass. 505, 516 (1965). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Edgerlygreen1 sentence1984Commonwealth v. Dustin, ante 481, 486 (1984). *673 See Commonwealth v. Edgerly, 390 Mass. 103, 106-107 (1983); Commonwealth v. MacDonald (No. 2), 368 Mass. 403, 409-410 (1975). 4. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. MacDonald (No. 2)green1 sentence1984Commonwealth v. Dustin, ante 481, 486 (1984). *673 See Commonwealth v. Edgerly, 390 Mass. 103, 106-107 (1983); Commonwealth v. MacDonald (No. 2), 368 Mass. 403, 409-410 (1975). 4. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Massachusetts. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Maia
green
1 sentence2001At trial, the defendant made a claim similar to the one made in Commonwealth v. Maia, supra: here he believed he was in the apartment of his brother’s girlfriend’s mother, whereas in Maia , the defendant believed he was at his girlfriend’s apartment. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Commonwealth v. Baptista
green
1 sentence1999Citing Commonwealth v. Ferguson, 384 Mass. 13, 18 (1981), and Commonwealth v. Baptista, 32 Mass. App. Ct. 910 (1992),'the dissent seems to take the position, post at 496-497, that the defendant’s knowledge of the extended order cannot be inferred reasonably because that inference is itself based upon the inference that the defendant was served either by delivering a copy of the order to him in hand or by leaving it at his last and usual address. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.