Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldsongreen2 sentences1997They represent a public policy about the privilege to litigate.” Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson, 325 U.S. 304, 314 , 65 S.Ct. 1137, 1142 , 89 L.Ed. 1628, 1635 (1945). 1997They represent a public policy about the privilege to litigate.” Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson, 325 U.S. 304, 314 , 65 S.Ct. 1137, 1142 , 89 L.Ed. 1628, 1635 (1945). | 1 | 5 |
Walko Corp. v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc.green2 sentences2012They represent a public policy about the privilege to litigate.” 281 Md. at 210 , 378 A.2d 1100 (emphasis supplied). 2012They represent a public policy about the privilege to litigate.” 281 Md. at 210 , 378 A.2d 1100 (emphasis supplied). | 1 | 5 |
Archbishop of Washington v. Doegreen2 sentences2025A statute of repose serves “to effect a legislative judgment that a defendant should be free from liability after the legislatively determined period of time.” Id. at 532 (citation and quotation omitted). 2025A statute of limitations requires plaintiffs “to pursue claims with diligence” and “represent[s] a public policy about the privilege to litigate.” Id. at 531-32 (internal citations and quotations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
McMahan v. Dorchester Fertilizer Co.green2 sentences1980See McMahan v. Dorchester Fertilizer Co., 184 Md. 155 , 40 A.2d 313 (1944). 1980See McMahan v. Dorchester Fertilizer Co., 184 Md. 155 , 40 A.2d 313 (1944). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Burnett v. New York Central Railroad
green
2 sentences1977Co., 380 U.S. 424, 428 , 85 S. Ct. 1050 , 13 L.Ed.2d 941 (1965). 1977Co., 380 U.S. 424, 428 , 85 S. Ct. 1050 , 13 L.Ed.2d 941 (1965). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Burket v. Aldridge, Adm'r
green
2 sentences1977They represent a public policy about the privilege to litigate.” Accord, Feldman v. Granger, 255 Md. 288, 296-97 , 257 A. 2d 421 (1969); Burket v. Aldridge, Adm’r, 241 Md. 423, 428 , 216 A. 2d 910 (1966); see Burnett v. New York Central R. 1977They represent a public policy about the privilege to litigate.” Accord, Feldman v. Granger, 255 Md. 288, 296-97 , 257 A. 2d 421 (1969); Burket v. Aldridge, Adm’r, 241 Md. 423, 428 , 216 A. 2d 910 (1966); see Burnett v. New York Central R. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Feldman v. Granger
green
2 sentences1977They represent a public policy about the privilege to litigate.” Accord, Feldman v. Granger, 255 Md. 288, 296-97 , 257 A. 2d 421 (1969); Burket v. Aldridge, Adm’r, 241 Md. 423, 428 , 216 A. 2d 910 (1966); see Burnett v. New York Central R. 1977They represent a public policy about the privilege to litigate.” Accord, Feldman v. Granger, 255 Md. 288, 296-97 , 257 A. 2d 421 (1969); Burket v. Aldridge, Adm’r, 241 Md. 423, 428 , 216 A. 2d 910 (1966); see Burnett v. New York Central R. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.