Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Maine opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bean v. Cummingsgreen2 sentences2021Moreover, " [w]here a Maine Rule of Civil Procedure is identical to the comparable federal rule, [the Law C ourt has] value[d] constructions and comments on the federal rule as aids in construing [Maine's] parallel provision." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). 4 The court notes that Lilac has not explained why the statement was false when made. 7 face value, but rather sought confirmation from Lilac as to whether Ms. Carbona was correct. 2021Lilac argues that the events highlighted in its motion for leave support its claims for tortious interference, defamation, and IIED, but the supplemental events do not allow Lilac to state a claim for many of the same reasons its complaint fails. also Bean, 2008 ME 18 , ! 11, 939 A .2d 676 ("Where a Maine Rule of Civil Procedure is identical to the comparable federal rule, [the Law Court has] value[d] constructions and comments on the federal rule as aids in construing [Maine's] parallel provision."). 27 With respect to Lilac's claim of tortious interference, the court does not see any conduct | 3 | 8 |
Mayle v. Felixgreen1 sentence2021Mayle v. Felix, 545 U.S. 644, 659 (2005). | 1 | 1 |
Rancourt v. City of Bangorgreen2 sentences2021See Rancourt v. Bangor, 400 A.2d 354,356 (Me. 1979); see 26 applied to achieve the goal set forth in Rule 1: the 'just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action."' Rancourt v. Bangor, 400 A.2d 354,356 (Me. 1979). 2021See Rancourt v. Bangor, 400 A.2d 354,356 (Me. 1979); see 26 applied to achieve the goal set forth in Rule 1: the 'just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action."' Rancourt v. Bangor, 400 A.2d 354,356 (Me. 1979). | 1 | 1 |
S. John Chipser v. Kohlmeyer & Co., a Partnership, and Thomson & McKinnon Auchincloss Kohlmeyer, Inc., a Corporationgreen2 sentences1987See 9 Moore's Federal Practice § 204.-13[4], at 4-107 (2d ed. 1986) (discussing standard of review under the comparable federal rule [2] ); see Chipser v. Kohlmeyer & Co., 600 F.2d 1061, 1063 (5th Cir.1979). 1987See 9 Moore’s Federal Practice § 204.-13[4], at 4-107 (2d ed. 1986) (discussing standard of review under the comparable federal rule 2 ); see Chipser v. Kohlmeyer & Co., 600 F.2d 1061, 1063 (5th Cir.1979). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Maine Central Railroad v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad
green
1 sentence2010Rule 8(a) is "practically identical to the comparable federal rule[]." Id. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.