Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Jackson v. Rhalygreen2 sentences2022“In short, if the trial court applies ‘the correct legal standard,’ we must affirm the decision, regardless of what any one of us individually might have ruled had we been the judge, unless there is a ‘definite and firm conviction that the court below committed clear error.’” Id. at 982 (quoting City of Jackson 4 v. Rhaly, 95 So. 3d 602, 607 (Miss. 2012)). 2017Television, 148 So. 3d 977, 981 (Miss. 2014)). “‘[I]f the trial court applies the “correct legal standard,” we must affirm the decision, regardless of what any of us individually might have ruled had we been the judge, unless there is a “definite and firm conviction that the court below committed clear error.”’” Ferguson, 179 So. 3d at 1064 (quoting Pierce v. Heritage Props., Inc., 688 So. 2d 1385, 1388 (Miss. 1997) (quoting City of Jackson v. Rhaly, 95 So. 3d 602, 607 (Miss. 1990))). 20 ¶44. | 5 | 5 |
David Michael Ashmore v. Mississippi Authority on Educational Televisiongreen2 sentences2022“In short, if the trial court applies ‘the correct legal standard,’ we must affirm the decision, regardless of what any one of us individually might have ruled had we been the judge, unless there is a ‘definite and firm conviction that the court below committed clear error.’” Id. at 982 (quoting City of Jackson 4 v. Rhaly, 95 So. 3d 602, 607 (Miss. 2012)). 2017Television, 148 So. 3d 977, 981 (Miss. 2014)). “‘[I]f the trial court applies the “correct legal standard,” we must affirm the decision, regardless of what any of us individually might have ruled had we been the judge, unless there is a “definite and firm conviction that the court below committed clear error.”’” Ferguson, 179 So. 3d at 1064 (quoting Pierce v. Heritage Props., Inc., 688 So. 2d 1385, 1388 (Miss. 1997) (quoting City of Jackson v. Rhaly, 95 So. 3d 602, 607 (Miss. 1990))). 20 ¶44. | 4 | 5 |
Willie Kinzie v. Belk Department Stores, L.P., Belk, Inc.green2 sentences2024Stores L.P., 164 So. 3d 974, 977 (¶4) (Miss. 2015) (quoting Ashmore v. Miss. 2015Stated differently, “the Court should engage in ‘measured restraint in conducting appellate review’ and should not decide whether it would have dismissed the original action but whether the dismissal amounted to clear error.” Kinzie v. Belk Dep’t Stores, L.P., 164 So.3d 974, 977 (Miss.2015) (citing Ashmore, 148 So.3d at 982 ). | 2 | 2 |
Pierce v. Heritage Properties, Inc.green2 sentences2017Television, 148 So. 3d 977, 981 (Miss. 2014)). “‘[I]f the trial court applies the “correct legal standard,” we must affirm the decision, regardless of what any of us individually might have ruled had we been the judge, unless there is a “definite and firm conviction that the court below committed clear error.”’” Ferguson, 179 So. 3d at 1064 (quoting Pierce v. Heritage Props., Inc., 688 So. 2d 1385, 1388 (Miss. 1997) (quoting City of Jackson v. Rhaly, 95 So. 3d 602, 607 (Miss. 1990))). 20 ¶44. 2015A “trial court should dismiss a cause of action for failure to comply with discovery only under the most extreme circumstances.” Pierce v. Heritage Props., Inc., 688 So.2d 1385, 1388 (Miss.1997) (emphasis added). | 2 | 2 |
Demario Ferguson v. The University of Mississippi Medical Centergreen2 sentences2017Television, 148 So. 3d 977, 981 (Miss. 2014)). “‘[I]f the trial court applies the “correct legal standard,” we must affirm the decision, regardless of what any of us individually might have ruled had we been the judge, unless there is a “definite and firm conviction that the court below committed clear error.”’” Ferguson, 179 So. 3d at 1064 (quoting Pierce v. Heritage Props., Inc., 688 So. 2d 1385, 1388 (Miss. 1997) (quoting City of Jackson v. Rhaly, 95 So. 3d 602, 607 (Miss. 1990))). 20 ¶44. 2017Ctr., 179 So. 3d 1060, 1064 (¶17) (Miss. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 2 |
Hewes v. Langstongreen1 sentence2021The application of the attorney-client privilege is “a mixed question of law and fact.” Hewes v. Langston, 853 So. 2d 1237, 1241 (¶13) (Miss. 2003). | 1 | 1 |
Stewart v. Merchants Nat. Bankgreen1 sentence2015Stewart v. Merchants Nat’l Bank, 700 So.2d 255, 258 (Miss.1997) (citing Century 21 Deep South Props., Ltd. v. Corson, 612 So.2d 359, 369 (Miss.1992)). “[I]f the trial court applies the ‘correct, legal standard,’ we must affirm the decision, regardless of what any one of us individually might have ruled had we been the judge, unless there is a ‘definite and firm conviction that the court below committed clear error,’ ” Ashmore v. Miss. | 1 | 1 |
Century 21 Deep South Prop., Ltd. v. Corsongreen1 sentence2015Stewart v. Merchants Nat’l Bank, 700 So.2d 255, 258 (Miss.1997) (citing Century 21 Deep South Props., Ltd. v. Corson, 612 So.2d 359, 369 (Miss.1992)). “[I]f the trial court applies the ‘correct, legal standard,’ we must affirm the decision, regardless of what any one of us individually might have ruled had we been the judge, unless there is a ‘definite and firm conviction that the court below committed clear error,’ ” Ashmore v. Miss. | 1 | 1 |
Palmer v. Biloxi Regional Medical Center, Inc.green2 sentences2015Ctr., 564 So.2d 1346, 1367 (Miss.1990)). ¶ 17. “[I]f the trial court applies the ‘correct legal standard,’ we must affirm the decision, regardless of what any of us individually might have ruled had we been the judge, unless there is a ‘definite and firm conviction that the court below committed clear error.’ ” Id. (citing City of Jackson v. Rhaly, 96 So.3d 602, 607 (Miss.2012)). 2015Ctr., 564 So.2d 1346, 1367 (Miss.1990)). ¶ 17. “[I]f the trial court applies the ‘correct legal standard,’ we must affirm the decision, regardless of what any of us individually might have ruled had we been the judge, unless there is a ‘definite and firm conviction that the court below committed clear error.’ ” Id. (citing City of Jackson v. Rhaly, 96 So.3d 602, 607 (Miss.2012)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Fresenius Med. Care Holdings, Inc. v. Hood
green
1 sentence2021“If the chancery court applies the correct legal standard, we must affirm the decision, regardless of what any of us 7 individually might have ruled had we been the judge, unless there is a definite and firm conviction that the court below committed clear error.” Id. (brackets omitted) (quoting Newsome v. Shoemake, 234 So. 3d 1215 , 1226 (¶43) (Miss. 2017)). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Khambraya Stanley v. Scott Petroleum Corporation
green
1 sentence2017The sole case upon which Marilyn Newsome relies in support of her argument is Stanley v. Scott Petroleum Corp., 184 So. 3d 940 (Miss. 2016). | 1 | 2017–2017 |