Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jasso v. Stategreen2 sentences2011On the contrary, when the length of delay is presumptively prejudicial, the burden of persuasion is on the state to show that the delay did not prejudice the defendant.”); Jasso v. State, 655 So.2d 30, 35 (Miss.1995) ("This Court has stated that the State actually has to show lack of prejudice in order to prevail in this factor.”); Ross, 605 So.2d at 23 (“The analysis must, then, proceed to the other three Barker factors, in which the state bears the burden of proving no prejudice to the defendant.”). .Black's Law Dictionary 1304 (9th ed.2009) (emphasis added). . 2008On the contrary, when the length of delay is presumptively prejudicial, the burden of persuasion is on the state to show that the delay did not prejudice the defendant.”); Jasso v. State, 655 So. 2d 30, 35 (Miss. 1995) (“This Court has stated that the State actually has to show lack of prejudice in order to prevail in this factor.”); Ross, 605 So. 2d at 23 (“The analysis must, then, proceed to the other three Barker factors, in which the state bears the burden of proving no prejudice to the defendant.”). 108 Black’s Law Dictionary 1304 (9th ed. 2009) (emphasis added). 34 ¶86. | 2 | 2 |
Ross v. Stategreen2 sentences2011On the contrary, when the length of delay is presumptively prejudicial, the burden of persuasion is on the state to show that the delay did not prejudice the defendant.”); Jasso v. State, 655 So.2d 30, 35 (Miss.1995) ("This Court has stated that the State actually has to show lack of prejudice in order to prevail in this factor.”); Ross, 605 So.2d at 23 (“The analysis must, then, proceed to the other three Barker factors, in which the state bears the burden of proving no prejudice to the defendant.”). .Black's Law Dictionary 1304 (9th ed.2009) (emphasis added). . 2008On the contrary, when the length of delay is presumptively prejudicial, the burden of persuasion is on the state to show that the delay did not prejudice the defendant.”); Jasso v. State, 655 So. 2d 30, 35 (Miss. 1995) (“This Court has stated that the State actually has to show lack of prejudice in order to prevail in this factor.”); Ross, 605 So. 2d at 23 (“The analysis must, then, proceed to the other three Barker factors, in which the state bears the burden of proving no prejudice to the defendant.”). 108 Black’s Law Dictionary 1304 (9th ed. 2009) (emphasis added). 34 ¶86. | 2 | 2 |
Smith v. Stategreen2 sentences2022Smith v. State, 550 So. 2d 406, 408 (Miss. 1989). 2017Id. | 1 | 2 |
United States v. Homer Lee Tuckergreen1 sentence2012Most importantly, a “due[-]process violation cannot be established absent a showing of prejudice to the appellant.” Jackson v. State, 910 So.2d 658, 665 (¶ 17) (Miss.Ct.App.2005) (quoting United States v. Tucker, 8 F.3d 673, 676 (9th Cir.1993)). | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen1 sentence2012Most importantly, a “due[-]process violation cannot be established absent a showing of prejudice to the appellant.” Jackson v. State, 910 So.2d 658, 665 (¶ 17) (Miss.Ct.App.2005) (quoting United States v. Tucker, 8 F.3d 673, 676 (9th Cir.1993)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Woodallgreen1 sentence2006Woodall, 801 So.2d at 682 (¶ 12). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Fergusongreen1 sentence2005State v. Ferguson, 576 So.2d 1252, 1254 (Miss.1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Price v. State
green
2 sentences2010Her-sick, 904 So.2d at 121; Price, 898 So.2d at 647 . 2009Hersick, 904 So. 2d at 121 ; Price, 898 So. 2d at 647 . | 2 | 2009–2010 |
Doggett v. United States
green
2 sentences2011Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647 , 652 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 2686, 2691 , 120 L.Ed.2d 520 (1992). . 2011Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647 , 652 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 2686, 2691 , 120 L.Ed.2d 520 (1992). . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Hersick v. State
green
1 sentence2009Hersick, 904 So. 2d at 121 ; Price, 898 So. 2d at 647 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Jaco v. State
green
1 sentence1994Jaco, 574 So.2d at 630 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.