three Barker factors (Wyoming) · Go Syfert
← Wyoming issues

three Barker factors in Wyoming

7 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2023 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Barry Scott v. Board of Trustees of Fremont County School District Number Onegreen
wyo · 2015 · cited in 1 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See Durkee v. State, 2015 WY 128 , 1 15, 857 P.8d 1106, 1111 (Wyo.2015) (citing cases in which this Court found that delays of 562, 720 and 887 days are presumptively prejudicial and require analysis of the other three Barker factors). *1300 2.

11
Fortner v. Stategreen
wyo · 1992 · cited in 1 Wyoming opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See, e.g., Mascarenas, ¶ 12, 315 P.3d at 661 (332 day delay warranted further analysis); Fortner v. State, 843 P.2d 1139, 1145 (Wyo.1992) (276 day -delay triggered further analysis) Caton v. State, 709 P.2d 1260 (Wyo.1985) (204 day delay triggered further analysis).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Webb v. State green
wyo · 2017
2 sentences

2023Moreover, if Mr. Person does not “demonstrate prejudice, the other three Barker factors must weigh heavily in his favor to establish a speedy trial violation.” Id. (citation omitted). [¶49] Mr. Person argues all three prejudice considerations weigh in his favor.

2020In such a case, “the other three Barker factors must weigh heavily in his favor to establish a speedy trial violation.” Fairbourn, ¶ 59, 465 P.3d at 427 (quoting Webb, ¶ 23, 401 P.3d at 924 ).

32020–2023
Mathewson v. State green
wyo · 2019
2 sentences

2022Balancing the Factors [¶64] Because Mr. Vlahos “failed to demonstrate he was prejudiced by the delay, ‘the other three Barker factors must weigh heavily in his favor to establish a speedy trial violation.’” Id. at ¶ 31, 503 P.3d at 68 (quoting Mathewson, ¶ 67, 438 P.3d at 212 ).

2022Balancing of the Factors [¶31] Because Mr. Cotney failed to demonstrate he was prejudiced by the delay, “the other three Barker factors must weigh heavily in his favor to establish a speedy trial violation.” Id. (emphasis omitted) (quoting Castellanos, ¶ 88, 366 P.3d at 1303 ).

22022–2022
Nathaniel Castellanos v. State green
wyo · 2016
1 sentence

2022Balancing of the Factors [¶31] Because Mr. Cotney failed to demonstrate he was prejudiced by the delay, “the other three Barker factors must weigh heavily in his favor to establish a speedy trial violation.” Id. (emphasis omitted) (quoting Castellanos, ¶ 88, 366 P.3d at 1303 ).

12022–2022
Bradley Ross Fairbourn v. The State of Wyoming green
wyo · 2020
1 sentence

2020In such a case, “the other three Barker factors must weigh heavily in his favor to establish a speedy trial violation.” Fairbourn, ¶ 59, 465 P.3d at 427 (quoting Webb, ¶ 23, 401 P.3d at 924 ).

12020–2020
Caton v. State green
wyo · 1985
1 sentence

2016See, e.g., Mascarenas, ¶ 12, 315 P.3d at 661 (332 day delay warranted further analysis); Fortner v. State, 843 P.2d 1139, 1145 (Wyo.1992) (276 day -delay triggered further analysis) Caton v. State, 709 P.2d 1260 (Wyo.1985) (204 day delay triggered further analysis).

12016–2016
Miller v. State green
wyo · 2009
1 sentence

2016Factor Two: Reason for Delay [¶72] The second factor in the Barker analysis requires that we examine which party was responsible for the delay in bringing the defendant to trial Miller v. State, 2009 WY 125, 40 , 217 P.3d 798, 805 (Wyo.2009).

12016–2016

Where else courts name it

NM 39 (1989–2025) TX 29 (1996–2025) AL 23 (1977–2024) LA 14 (2007–2025) MS 10 (1994–2022) TN 7 (1997–2026) NC 7 (2002–2025) WY 7 (2016–2023) NH 5 (1990–2015) DE 4 (1987–2025) GA 4 (2005–2020) OH 4 (2011–2025) WI 3 (1990–2023) RI 3 (1979–2003) MO 3 (2012–2023) VI 3 (2011–2026) OR 2 (1994–2000) MN 2 (1988–1999)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check