Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Will of Dunngreen2 sentences2019That presumption of ownership may be overcome “upon proof of forgery, fraud, duress, or an unrebutted presumption of undue influence.” Id. (quoting Reilly, 784 So. 2d at 942 (¶21)). 2011That presumption of ownership may be overcome “‘upon proof of forgery, fraud, duress, or an unrebutted presumption of undue influence.’ ” Reilly, 784 So.2d at 942 (¶ 21) (quoting Madden, 626 So.2d at 617 ). ¶ 25. | 2 | 2 |
Cooper v. Crabbgreen1 sentence1993See Cooper v. Crabb, 587 So.2d 236, 242 (Miss. 1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Madden v. Rhodes
green
2 sentences2011That presumption of ownership may be overcome “‘upon proof of forgery, fraud, duress, or an unrebutted presumption of undue influence.’ ” Reilly, 784 So.2d at 942 (¶ 21) (quoting Madden, 626 So.2d at 617 ). ¶ 25. 2006Pursuant to Mississippi law, at Ladell’s death, John presumptively held title to the funds in the certificate of deposit that bore his name with survivorship, absent a showing of “forgery, fraud, duress, or an unrebutted presumption of undue influence.” Madden, 626 So.2d at 617 . ¶ 16. | 7 | 1999–2011 |
Dejean v. Dejean
green
1 sentence2019That presumption of ownership may be overcome “upon proof of forgery, fraud, duress, or an unrebutted presumption of undue influence.” Id. (quoting Reilly, 784 So. 2d at 942 (¶21)). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Yarbrough v. Patrick
green
1 sentence2019Nevertheless, it was the Appellees’ burden to overcome Patrick’s ownership presumption.3 That presumption may have been overcome “upon proof of forgery, fraud, duress, or an unrebutted presumption of undue influence.” Yarbrough, 65 So. 3d at 871 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Shannon v. City of Hazlehurst
neutral
2 sentences1969Likewise, in Shannon v. City of Hazlehurst, 237 Miss. 828 , 116 So.2d 546 (1959), The Supreme Court found that the presumption had not been rebutted and reversed the decisions of the attorney referee, the commission and the circuit court which had been for the employer. 1969Likewise, in Shannon v. City of Hazlehurst, 237 Miss. 828 , 116 So.2d 546 (1959), The Supreme Court found that the presumption had not been rebutted and reversed the decisions of the attorney referee, the commission and the circuit court which had been for the employer. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.