10 North Carolina opinions name it 4 courts 2001–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Edmistengreen2 sentences2020Utilities Commission v. Edmisten, 314 N.C. 122, 132 , 333 S.E.2d 453, 460 (1985), vacated sub nom. 2020Utilities Commission v. Edmisten, 314 N.C. 122, 132 , 333 S.E.2d 453, 460 (1985), vacated sub nom. | 2 | 2 |
Missouri v. McNeelygreen2 sentences2016The exigent circumstances doctrine "applies when the exigencies of the situation make the needs of law enforcement so compelling that a warrantless search is objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment." Missouri v. McNeely, ---U.S. ----, ----, 133 S.Ct. 1552 , 1558, 185 L.Ed.2d 696 (2013). 2016The exigent circumstances doctrine "applies when the exigencies of the situation make the needs of law enforcement so compelling that a warrantless search is objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment." Missouri v. McNeely, ---U.S. ----, ----, 133 S.Ct. 1552 , 1558, 185 L.Ed.2d 696 (2013). | 1 | 2 |
Village Creek Property Owners' Ass'n v. Town of Edentongreen2 sentences2025In Village Creek Property Owners’ Association Inc. v. Town of Edenton, this Court considered whether “a party seeking to challenge a zoning ordinance by way of a declaratory judgment action is required to allege special damages[.]” 135 N.C. 2025App. 482, 485 , 520 S.E.2d 793, 795 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
RBS Citizens, N.A. v. Husaingreen1 sentence2019See, e.g., RBS Citizens, N.A. v. Husain, 291 F.R.D. 209, 218 (N.D. | 1 | 1 |
Cannon v. Daygreen1 sentence2007See Henry v. Farlow, 238 N.C. 542, 543-44 , 78 S.E.2d 244, 245 (1953); see also Cannon v. Day, 165 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
Henry v. Farlowgreen2 sentences2007See Henry v. Farlow, 238 N.C. 542, 543-44 , 78 S.E.2d 244, 245 (1953); see also Cannon v. Day, 165 N.C. 2007See Henry v. Farlow, 238 N.C. 542, 543-44 , 78 S.E.2d 244, 245 (1953); see also Cannon v. Day, 165 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Coolidge v. New Hampshire
green
2 sentences2016The party seeking the exception to the warrant requirement bears the burden of showing "the exigencies of the situation made that [warrantless] course imperative." Coolidge, 403 U.S. at 455 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 . 2016The party seeking the exception to the warrant requirement bears the burden of showing "the exigencies of the situation made that [warrantless] course imperative." Coolidge, 403 U.S. at 455 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 . | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Ridings v. Ridings
green
1 sentence2010Everyone is presumed to be sane until the contrary appears." Ridings v. Ridings , 55 N.C. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Long v. Harris
green
1 sentence2004Long v. Harris, 137 N.C. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Taylor v. City of Raleigh
green
2 sentences2001Standing exists to challenge a zoning ordinance by a declaratory judgment action when the plaintiff "has a specific personal and legal interest in the subject matter affected by the zoning ordinance and ... is directly and adversely affected thereby." Taylor, 290 N.C. at 620 , 227 S.E.2d at 583 . 2001Standing exists to challenge a zoning ordinance by a declaratory judgment action when the plaintiff "has a specific personal and legal interest in the subject matter affected by the zoning ordinance and ... is directly and adversely affected thereby." Taylor, 290 N.C. at 620 , 227 S.E.2d at 583 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.