Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1968–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Holster v. Bd. of Trustees of Passaic County Collegegreen2 sentences2002Furthermore a county may not turn to the State for exoneration or reimbursement. [ Holster, supra, 59 N.J. at 73 , 279 A.2d 798 .] Approximately one year after the Court’s Holster decision, a sharply divided Court (4-3) sustained the constitutionality of the New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority Law, L. 1971, c. 137, against a Debt Limitation Clause challenge. 2002Furthermore a county may not turn to the State for exoneration or reimbursement. [ Holster, supra, 59 N.J. at 73 , 279 A.2d 798 .] Approximately one year after the Court’s Holster decision, a sharply divided Court (4-3) sustained the constitutionality of the New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority Law, L. 1971, c. 137, against a Debt Limitation Clause challenge. | 2 | 3 |
New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. Parsonsgreen2 sentences1997It is to create an autonomous public corporate entity to undertake the task and to borrow money for the purpose on its own bonds.” (footnote omitted)); (2) the debt is dependent on a “special fund” or separate revenue source for its repayment, see, e.g., Clayton v. Kervick, 52 N.J. 138, 154 , 244 A.2d 281 (1968) (holding that the Educational Facilities Act did not violate the debt limitation clause because repayment of the debt was intended to come mainly from sources unrelated to legislative appropriations and that its operations, therefore, “may be compared favorably to the many self-liquida 1997It is to create an autonomous public corporate entity to undertake the task and to borrow money for the purpose on its own bonds.” (footnote omitted)); (2) the debt is dependent on a “special fund” or separate revenue source for its repayment, see, e.g., Clayton v. Kervick, 52 N.J. 138, 154 , 244 A.2d 281 (1968) (holding that the Educational Facilities Act did not violate the debt limitation clause because repayment of the debt was intended to come mainly from sources unrelated to legislative appropriations and that its operations, therefore, “may be compared favorably to the many self-liquida | 1 | 4 |
Spadoro v. Whitmangreen2 sentences2015Thus, contrary to the dissent’s assertion, the subject statute in City of Passaic did not survive Debt Limitation Clause analysis because the State’s required annual contribution was “an ‘ordinary government operating expense.’ ” See post at 231, 118 A.3d at 304 (quoting dissent *216 in Spadoro, supra, 150 N.J. at 11 , 695 A.2d 654 ). 9 Instead, as this Court has made clear in numerous cases interpreting and applying the City of Passaic holding, the statute at issue there was permissible under the Debt Limitation Clause because the payment it required was one that was subject to legislative ap 2015Thus, contrary to the dissent’s assertion, the subject statute in City of Passaic did not survive Debt Limitation Clause analysis because the State’s required annual contribution was “an ‘ordinary government operating expense.’ ” See post at 231, 118 A.3d at 304 (quoting dissent *216 in Spadoro, supra, 150 N.J. at 11 , 695 A.2d 654 ). 9 Instead, as this Court has made clear in numerous cases interpreting and applying the City of Passaic holding, the statute at issue there was permissible under the Debt Limitation Clause because the payment it required was one that was subject to legislative ap | 1 | 3 |
Lonegan v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See id. at 13-15, 819 A.2d 395 . 2015See id. at 13-15, 819 A.2d 395 . | 1 | 1 |
Behnke v. New Jersey Highway Authoritygreen2 sentences2002See New Jersey Turnpike Auth., supra, 3 N.J. at 238 , 69 A.2d 875 (noting that amortization was to be payable solely from Turnpike tolls and revenues); Behnke, supra, 13 N.J. at 20, 29, 97 A.2d 647 (sustaining Guaranty Act, approved by voters, authorizing State to satisfy obligations arising from New Jersey Highway Authority bonds “in the event the revenue from tolls and otherwise shall be insufficient for the purpose” and noting that Highway Authority’s tolls and revenues are pledged to secure amortization of bonds); Clayton, supra, 52 N.J. at 154 , 244 A.2d 281 (noting that annual rental pay 2002See New Jersey Turnpike Auth., supra, 3 N.J. at 238 , 69 A.2d 875 (noting that amortization was to be payable solely from Turnpike tolls and revenues); Behnke, supra, 13 N.J. at 20, 29, 97 A.2d 647 (sustaining Guaranty Act, approved by voters, authorizing State to satisfy obligations arising from New Jersey Highway Authority bonds “in the event the revenue from tolls and otherwise shall be insufficient for the purpose” and noting that Highway Authority’s tolls and revenues are pledged to secure amortization of bonds); Clayton, supra, 52 N.J. at 154 , 244 A.2d 281 (noting that annual rental pay | 1 | 1 |
In Re Passaic County Utilities Auth.green2 sentences2002See In re Passaic County Utilities Auth., 164 N.J. 270, 306-07 , 753 A. 2d 661 (2000) (invalidating utility authority's imposition of Environmental Impact Charge on non-users but deferring effective date of judgment for ninety days to provide opportunity for legislative action). 2002See In re Passaic County Utilities Auth., 164 N.J. 270, 306-07 , 753 A. 2d 661 (2000) (invalidating utility authority's imposition of Environmental Impact Charge on non-users but deferring effective date of judgment for ninety days to provide opportunity for legislative action). | 1 | 1 |
City of Passaic v. Consolidated Police & Firemen's Pension Fund Commissiongreen2 sentences1991For example, in City of Passaic v. Consolidated Police and Firemen’s Pension Fund Commission, 18 N.J. 137 , 113 A.2d 22 (1955), the Court examined a pension statute that provided: The State of New Jersey shall contribute annually, throughout a period of thirty years ... such amount as may be necessary to make up the balance of each annual payment____ All funds necessary to meet the State’s share of said annual payments shall be included in the annual State budget and appropriated by the Legislature. [Id. at 144, 113 A.2d 22 .] The Court rejected the plaintiff’s contention that this provision v 1991For example, in City of Passaic v. Consolidated Police and Firemen’s Pension Fund Commission, 18 N.J. 137 , 113 A.2d 22 (1955), the Court examined a pension statute that provided: The State of New Jersey shall contribute annually, throughout a period of thirty years ... such amount as may be necessary to make up the balance of each annual payment____ All funds necessary to meet the State’s share of said annual payments shall be included in the annual State budget and appropriated by the Legislature. [Id. at 144, 113 A.2d 22 .] The Court rejected the plaintiff’s contention that this provision v | 1 | 1 |
Kelley v. Earlegreen2 sentences1973The dissent quoted with approval from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in Kelley v. Earle, 325 Pa. 337 , 190 A. 140, 147 (Sup. Ct. 1937), to the effect that “It is never an illegal evasion to accomplish a desired result, lawful in itself, by discovering a legal way to do it”. (13 N. J. at 76). 1973The dissent quoted with approval from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in Kelley v. Earle, 325 Pa. 337 , 190 A. 140, 147 (Sup. Ct. 1937), to the effect that “It is never an illegal evasion to accomplish a desired result, lawful in itself, by discovering a legal way to do it”. (13 N. J. at 76). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Clayton v. Kervick
green
2 sentences1997It is to create an autonomous public corporate entity to undertake the task and to borrow money for the purpose on its own bonds.” (footnote omitted)); (2) the debt is dependent on a “special fund” or separate revenue source for its repayment, see, e.g., Clayton v. Kervick, 52 N.J. 138, 154 , 244 A.2d 281 (1968) (holding that the Educational Facilities Act did not violate the debt limitation clause because repayment of the debt was intended to come mainly from sources unrelated to legislative appropriations and that its operations, therefore, “may be compared favorably to the many self-liquida 1997It is to create an autonomous public corporate entity to undertake the task and to borrow money for the purpose on its own bonds.” (footnote omitted)); (2) the debt is dependent on a “special fund” or separate revenue source for its repayment, see, e.g., Clayton v. Kervick, 52 N.J. 138, 154 , 244 A.2d 281 (1968) (holding that the Educational Facilities Act did not violate the debt limitation clause because repayment of the debt was intended to come mainly from sources unrelated to legislative appropriations and that its operations, therefore, “may be compared favorably to the many self-liquida | 3 | 1973–2002 |
New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority v. McCrane
green
2 sentences2002New Jersey Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCrane, supra, 61 N.J. 1 , 292 A.2d 545 . 2002New Jersey Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCrane, supra, 61 N.J. 1 , 292 A.2d 545 . | 2 | 2001–2002 |
In Re the Loans of the New Jersey Property Liability Insurance Guaranty Ass'n
green
2 sentences2002VIII, § 2, ¶ 3.] B In In re Loans of the New Jersey Property Liability Insurance Guarantee Association, 124 N.J. 69, 75-76 , 590 A.2d 210 (1991), we explained that the cases in which this Court has construed the debt limitation clause fall into two categories. 2002VIII, § 2, ¶ 3.] B In In re Loans of the New Jersey Property Liability Insurance Guarantee Association, 124 N.J. 69, 75-76 , 590 A.2d 210 (1991), we explained that the cases in which this Court has construed the debt limitation clause fall into two categories. | 2 | 2001–2002 |
Witzenburger v. STATE EX REL. WYO., ETC.
green
2 sentences2002The legislature cannot do indirectly what it cannot do directly. [ Ibid. (internal citations and footnote omitted).] Those cases suggest other approaches to the Debt Limitation Clause analysis that rely, not on a legal construct, but rather on practical considerations relating to the source of debt payments or the category of expenses funded by the debt. *103 D Two recent cases of our Court require separate and individual consideration. 2002The legislature cannot do indirectly what it cannot do directly. [ Ibid. (internal citations and footnote omitted).] Those cases suggest other approaches to the Debt Limitation Clause analysis that rely, not on a legal construct, but rather on practical considerations relating to the source of debt payments or the category of expenses funded by the debt. *103 D Two recent cases of our Court require separate and individual consideration. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
City of Camden v. Byrne
green
2 sentences1991The Court came to a similar conclusion in City of Camden v. Byrne, 82 N.J. 133 , 411 A.2d 462 (1980). 1991The Court came to a similar conclusion in City of Camden v. Byrne, 82 N.J. 133 , 411 A.2d 462 (1980). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Behnke v. NJ Highway Authority
green
1 sentence1972Holster v. Board of Trustees of Passaic County College ; New Jersey Mortgage Finance Agency v. McCrane ; Clayton v. Kervick ; *15 Roe v. Kervick, all supra; Behnke v. New Jersey Highway Authority, 25 N.J. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
McCutcheon v. State Building Authority
red
2 sentences1968He then dealt with the legal and constitutional points raised by the parties and disposed of them in the following manner: Though he did not consider himself, as the trial judge, free to entertain the Attorney General's request that the holding of this Court in McCutcheon, supra, 13 N.J. 46 , be overruled, he concluded that even within the restrictive principles enunciated there, the Authority's bonds would nuot constitute debts or liabilities of the State and their issuance would therefore not be in violation of the debt limitation clause of the New Jersey Constitution ( Art. 1968He then dealt with the legal and constitutional points raised by the parties and disposed of them in the following manner: Though he did not consider himself, as the trial judge, free to entertain the Attorney General's request that the holding of this Court in McCutcheon, supra, 13 N.J. 46 , be overruled, he concluded that even within the restrictive principles enunciated there, the Authority's bonds would nuot constitute debts or liabilities of the State and their issuance would therefore not be in violation of the debt limitation clause of the New Jersey Constitution ( Art. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.