Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 New York opinions name it 3 courts 1900–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Denny v. Ford Motor Co.green2 sentences2015“This standard demands an inquiry into such factors as (1) the product’s utility to the public as a whole, (2) its utility to the individual user, (3) the likelihood that the product will cause injury, (4) the availability of a safer design, (5) the possibility of designing and manufacturing the product so that it is safer but remains functional and reasonably priced, (6) the degree of awareness of the product’s potential danger that can reasonablely be attributed to the injured user, and (7) the manufacturer’s ability to spread the cost of any safety-related design changes” (Denny v Ford Moto 2008“This standard demands an inquiry into such factors as (1) the product’s utility to the public as a whole, (2) its utility to the individual user, (3) the likelihood that the prod- net will cause injury, (4) the availability of a safer design, (5) the possibility of designing and manufacturing the product so that it is safer but remains functional and reasonably priced, (6) the degree of awareness of the product’s potential danger that can reasonably be attributed to the injured user, and (7) the manufacturer’s ability to spread the cost of any safety-related design changes” (Denny v Ford Moto | 2 | 3 |
Yun Tung Chow v. Reckitt & Colman, Inc.green1 sentence2015Liability attaches when an analysis of these factors leads one to conclude that “the utility of the product did not outweigh the risk inherent in marketing” it (Denny v Ford Motor Co., 87 NY2d at 257 ; see Yun Tung Chow v Reckitt & Colman, Inc., 17 NY3d 29, 34 [2011]). | 1 | 1 |
Fallon v. Hannay & Son, Inc.green1 sentence1996Co., supra, at 109; Fallon v Hannay & Son, supra, at 99). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Trustees of the Village of Canandaigua v. Foster
green
2 sentences1900The law is reasonable, and does not demand of an owner of property more than the exercise of ordinary care with respect to the rights of third persons.” But it is urged that under Trustees of Canandaigua v. Foster ( 156 N. Y. 354 ) the defendant is liable because the grating wras within the line of the street. 1900The law is reasonable, and does not demand of an owner of property more than the exercise of ordinary care with' respect to the rights of third persons.” But it is urged that under Trustees v. Foster, 150 N. Y. 354 , 50 N. E. 971 , 41 L. | 2 | 1900–1900 |
Le Frois Foods Corp. v. Policy Advancing Corp.
green
1 sentence1987Plaintiff is not excused from answering the demands because of his claim that defendants have full knowledge of the facts (see, 6 Carmody-Wait 2d, NY Prac § 36:23; Waldman v Allen, 87 AD2d 817 ; Spencer v Holt, 86 AD2d 981 ; Le Frois Foods Corp. v Policy Advancing Corp., 59 AD2d 1013 ). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Spencer v. Holt
neutral
1 sentence1987Plaintiff is not excused from answering the demands because of his claim that defendants have full knowledge of the facts (see, 6 Carmody-Wait 2d, NY Prac § 36:23; Waldman v Allen, 87 AD2d 817 ; Spencer v Holt, 86 AD2d 981 ; Le Frois Foods Corp. v Policy Advancing Corp., 59 AD2d 1013 ). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Waldman v. Allen
neutral
1 sentence1987Plaintiff is not excused from answering the demands because of his claim that defendants have full knowledge of the facts (see, 6 Carmody-Wait 2d, NY Prac § 36:23; Waldman v Allen, 87 AD2d 817 ; Spencer v Holt, 86 AD2d 981 ; Le Frois Foods Corp. v Policy Advancing Corp., 59 AD2d 1013 ). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Hale v. Henkel
red
1 sentence1978In Hale v. Henkel, supra, the court said: " 'But, if the criminality has already been taken away, the amendment ceases to apply. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Matter of Hickox v. Griffin
green
1 sentence1952It is my judgment that the Crones have squarely met the demands of the rule: ‘ ‘ There must at least be proof that a particular property suffers a singular disadvantage through the operation of a zoning regulation before a variance thereof can be allowed on the ground of 1 unnecessary hardship ’ ” (Matter of Hickox v. Griffin, 298 N. Y. 365 , 870-371 and cases cited). | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Babbage v. . Powers
green
1 sentence1917The law is reasonable, and does not demand of an owner of property more than the exercise of ordinary care, with respect to the rights of third persons.” In Babbage v. Powers, 130 N. Y. 281 , a vault was covered with flagstones forming the sidewalk of a street in the city of Eochester, and while plaintiff was passing one of these gave way and he fell through into the vault underneath. | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Rosenstein v. . Fox
green
1 sentence1900The law is reasonable, and does not demand of an owner of property more than the exercise of ordinary care with' respect to the rights of third persons.” But it is urged that under Trustees v. Foster, 150 N. Y. 354 , 50 N. E. 971 , 41 L. | 1 | 1900–1900 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.