10 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1949–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Collins v. Youngbloodgreen2 sentences2025See Collins v. Youngblood , 497 U.S. 37, 42 (1990) (citing Beazell v. Ohio , 269 U.S. 167, 169-70 (1925)); Starkey , 2013 OK 43 Collins and Beazell ). 2025See Collins v. Youngblood , 497 U.S. 37, 42 (1990) (citing Beazell v. Ohio , 269 U.S. 167, 169-70 (1925)); Starkey , 2013 OK 43 Collins and Beazell ). | 1 | 2 |
Beazell v. Ohiogreen2 sentences2025See Collins v. Youngblood , 497 U.S. 37, 42 (1990) (citing Beazell v. Ohio , 269 U.S. 167, 169-70 (1925)); Starkey , 2013 OK 43 Collins and Beazell ). 2025See Collins v. Youngblood , 497 U.S. 37, 42 (1990) (citing Beazell v. Ohio , 269 U.S. 167, 169-70 (1925)); Starkey , 2013 OK 43 Collins and Beazell ). | 1 | 1 |
Sams v. Stategreen2 sentences2024We disagree. ¶12 To revoke a suspended sentence based on an out-of-state crime, the State "must show the finality of a judgment or the facts to support one." Sams v. State , 1988 OK CR 137, ¶ 6, 758 P.2d 834, 835. 2024We disagree. ¶12 To revoke a suspended sentence based on an out-of-state crime, the State "must show the finality of a judgment or the facts to support one." Sams v. State , 1988 OK CR 137, ¶ 6, 758 P.2d 834, 835. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. EZELL
green
2 sentences2022Oklahoma Bar Association v. Ezell , 2020 OK 55 , 466 P.3d 551 , the lawyer was guilty of two misdemeanor counts, (1) Falsely Reporting a Crime in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 589, and (2) Use of a Computer to Violate Oklahoma Statutes in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 1958. 2022Oklahoma Bar Association v. Ezell , 2020 OK 55 , 466 P.3d 551 , the lawyer was guilty of two misdemeanor counts, (1) Falsely Reporting a Crime in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 589, and (2) Use of a Computer to Violate Oklahoma Statutes in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 1958. | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
green
2 sentences2025See Collins v. Youngblood , 497 U.S. 37, 42 (1990) (citing Beazell v. Ohio , 269 U.S. 167, 169-70 (1925)); Starkey , 2013 OK 43 Collins and Beazell ). 2025See Collins v. Youngblood , 497 U.S. 37, 42 (1990) (citing Beazell v. Ohio , 269 U.S. 167, 169-70 (1925)); Starkey , 2013 OK 43 Collins and Beazell ). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Hunt v. State
green
1 sentence1986Cf Hunt v. State, 601 P.2d 464 (Okl.Cr.1979) (even where scienter was an element of the crime and an instruction was requested, this Court would not reverse where there was no reasonable possibility that the verdict would have been different had such an instruction been given), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2951 , 64 L.Ed.2d 830 (1980). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Brooks v. Wyrick
green
1 sentence1986Cf Hunt v. State, 601 P.2d 464 (Okl.Cr.1979) (even where scienter was an element of the crime and an instruction was requested, this Court would not reverse where there was no reasonable possibility that the verdict would have been different had such an instruction been given), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2951 , 64 L.Ed.2d 830 (1980). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Sanders v. United States
green
1 sentence1986Cf Hunt v. State, 601 P.2d 464 (Okl.Cr.1979) (even where scienter was an element of the crime and an instruction was requested, this Court would not reverse where there was no reasonable possibility that the verdict would have been different had such an instruction been given), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2951 , 64 L.Ed.2d 830 (1980). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Hayward v. Day
green
1 sentence1986Cf Hunt v. State, 601 P.2d 464 (Okl.Cr.1979) (even where scienter was an element of the crime and an instruction was requested, this Court would not reverse where there was no reasonable possibility that the verdict would have been different had such an instruction been given), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 969 , 100 S.Ct. 2951 , 64 L.Ed.2d 830 (1980). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Berg v. State
neutral
2 sentences1977Defendant's only authorities are Gamble v. State, Okl.Cr., 546 P.2d 1336 (1976) and Berg v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 320 , 262 P.2d 913 (1953), which speak to the proposition that "There may be some situations in which the admission of weapons may be unduly prejudicial." Gamble v. State, supra, at 1342. *536 Berg dealt with a charge of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor and the State introduced weapons and other items not related to the charge. 1977Defendant's only authorities are Gamble v. State, Okl.Cr., 546 P.2d 1336 (1976) and Berg v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 320 , 262 P.2d 913 (1953), which speak to the proposition that "There may be some situations in which the admission of weapons may be unduly prejudicial." Gamble v. State, supra, at 1342. *536 Berg dealt with a charge of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor and the State introduced weapons and other items not related to the charge. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Gamble v. State
green
2 sentences1977Defendant’s only authorities are Gamble v. State, Okl.Cr., 546 P.2d 1336 (1976) and Berg v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 320 , 262 P.2d 913 (1953), which speak to the proposition that “There may be some situations in which the admission of weapons may be unduly prejudicial.” Gamble v. State, supra, at 1342. 1977Defendant's only authorities are Gamble v. State, Okl.Cr., 546 P.2d 1336 (1976) and Berg v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 320 , 262 P.2d 913 (1953), which speak to the proposition that "There may be some situations in which the admission of weapons may be unduly prejudicial." Gamble v. State, supra, at 1342. *536 Berg dealt with a charge of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor and the State introduced weapons and other items not related to the charge. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Green v. United States
green
2 sentences1972In Green v. United States, 355 U.S. 184 , 78 S.Ct. 221 , 2 L.Ed.2d 199 (1957), the defendant was charged and tried for first degree murder, but convicted of second degree murder. 1972In Green v. United States, 355 U.S. 184 , 78 S.Ct. 221 , 2 L.Ed.2d 199 (1957), the defendant was charged and tried for first degree murder, but convicted of second degree murder. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Fred Bridges v. United States
neutral
1 sentence1962The Circuit Court of Appeals 9th Circuit held in Bridges v. United States, 259 F.2d 611 : “A prosecution for unlawfully selling and dispensing a narcotic drug and fraudulently concealing and facilitating the concealment of such drugs unlawfully imported into the United States involved two separate offenses authorizing consecutive sentences even though violations allegedly arose out of one transaction.” No doubt the Legislature intended that a man be tried only one time for a crime in violation of the Narcotics Act and the only way the defendant could be guaranteed this would be for the State t | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Tuggle v. State
green
1 sentence1949In Tuggle v. State, 73 Okla. | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.