process inquiry in Oregon

2002"Ours is not a society where police can stop any citizen and require the production of an `identification card' without reason." State v. Tourtillott, 289 Or. 845, 868 , 618 P.2d 423 (1980), cert. den. 451 U.S. 972 , 101 S.Ct. 2051 , 68 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981). [6] We have also acknowledged, however, that "[s]treet encounters between patrolling policemen and citizens call the most subtle aspects of the Fourth Amendment into play. * * * "The police have no less right than any other person to approach another and make inquiry regarding circumstances of interest. * * * The encounter becomes subject to

2002“Ours is not a society where police can stop any citizen and require the production of an ‘identification card’ without reason.” State v. Tourtillot, 289 Or 845, 868 , 618 P2d 423 (1980), cert den 451 US 972 (1981). 6 We have also acknowledged, however, that “[s]treet encounters between patrolling policemen and citizens call the most subtle aspects of the Fourth Amendment into play. * * * “The police have no less right than any other person to approach another and make inquiry regarding circumstances of interest. * * * The encounter becomes subject to the restrictions of the Fourth Amendment,

2022The court said in Caren that, by providing a process for claim closure in claims involving combined conditions, ORS 656.268(1)(b) (setting forth procedure for the denial of combined conditions), the legislature had created an excep- tion to the “general rule” that a worker is to be compensated for total impairment that is caused in material part by the compensable injury. “[T]he method for calculating impairment in cases of com- bined conditions [as described in ORS 656.268(1)(b)] is an exception to, and limitation on, the general rule that the employer pays compensation for the full measure o

2020In addition, interested parties and the general public are entitled to be heard in the process of rule adoption under the Administrative Procedures Act.” Sun Ray Dairy v. OLCC, 16 Or App 63, 71 , 517 P2d 289 (1973).

2020In addition, interested parties and the general public are entitled to be heard in the process of rule adoption under the Administrative Procedures Act.” Sun Ray Dairy v. OLCC, 16 Or App 63, 71 , 517 P2d 289 (1973).

2002Relying, in part, on this court’s decision in Wantowski v. Crown Cork & Seal, 164 Or App 214 , 991 P2d 574 (1999), the board ruled that: “a claimant is not permitted to extract a portion of the disease (hearing loss) and claim that only that portion is caused in major part by work exposure. * * * [I]t is immaterial whether or not a ‘combined’ condition exists or whether non-industrial hearing loss is a separate process from hearing loss caused by industrial exposure.

2002Relying, in part, on this court’s decision in Wantowski v. Crown Cork & Seal, 164 Or App 214 , 991 P2d 574 (1999), the board ruled that: “a claimant is not permitted to extract a portion of the disease (hearing loss) and claim that only that portion is caused in major part by work exposure. * * * [I]t is immaterial whether or not a ‘combined’ condition exists or whether non-industrial hearing loss is a separate process from hearing loss caused by industrial exposure.

2002A holding of the person, no matter how minor, is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment even though no arrest has occurred." State v. Evans, 16 Or.App. 189, 193-94 , 517 P.2d 1225 (1974).

2002A holding of the person, no matter how minor, is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment even though no arrest has occurred." State v. Evans, 16 Or.App. 189, 193-94 , 517 P.2d 1225 (1974).

2002"Ours is not a society where police can stop any citizen and require the production of an `identification card' without reason." State v. Tourtillott, 289 Or. 845, 868 , 618 P.2d 423 (1980), cert. den. 451 U.S. 972 , 101 S.Ct. 2051 , 68 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981). [6] We have also acknowledged, however, that "[s]treet encounters between patrolling policemen and citizens call the most subtle aspects of the Fourth Amendment into play. * * * "The police have no less right than any other person to approach another and make inquiry regarding circumstances of interest. * * * The encounter becomes subject to

2002“Ours is not a society where police can stop any citizen and require the production of an ‘identification card’ without reason.” State v. Tourtillot, 289 Or 845, 868 , 618 P2d 423 (1980), cert den 451 US 972 (1981). 6 We have also acknowledged, however, that “[s]treet encounters between patrolling policemen and citizens call the most subtle aspects of the Fourth Amendment into play. * * * “The police have no less right than any other person to approach another and make inquiry regarding circumstances of interest. * * * The encounter becomes subject to the restrictions of the Fourth Amendment,

2002"Ours is not a society where police can stop any citizen and require the production of an `identification card' without reason." State v. Tourtillott, 289 Or. 845, 868 , 618 P.2d 423 (1980), cert. den. 451 U.S. 972 , 101 S.Ct. 2051 , 68 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981). [6] We have also acknowledged, however, that "[s]treet encounters between patrolling policemen and citizens call the most subtle aspects of the Fourth Amendment into play. * * * "The police have no less right than any other person to approach another and make inquiry regarding circumstances of interest. * * * The encounter becomes subject to

2002"Ours is not a society where police can stop any citizen and require the production of an `identification card' without reason." State v. Tourtillott, 289 Or. 845, 868 , 618 P.2d 423 (1980), cert. den. 451 U.S. 972 , 101 S.Ct. 2051 , 68 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981). [6] We have also acknowledged, however, that "[s]treet encounters between patrolling policemen and citizens call the most subtle aspects of the Fourth Amendment into play. * * * "The police have no less right than any other person to approach another and make inquiry regarding circumstances of interest. * * * The encounter becomes subject to

2001In addition, “the reference to ORS 656.268 in both sentences [of ORS 656.262(4)(g)] is a reference to a statute that addresses the process of claim closure.” Id.

2001Thus not only is the challenged instruction but one of many such instructions, but the process of instruction itself is but one of several components of the trial which may result in the judgment of conviction." Cupp, 414 U.S. at 146-47 , 94 S.Ct. 396 .

2001Thus not only is the challenged instruction but one of many such instructions, but the process of instruction itself is but one of several components of the trial which may result in the judgment of conviction." Cupp, 414 U.S. at 146-47 , 94 S.Ct. 396 .

2001However, we also held: “[I]n view of employer’s prompt closure of the claim immediately after the issuance of the denial, it does not appear that its conduct was intended to shortcut the ordinary process of claim closure or was otherwise unreasonable.” Chaffee, 94 Or App at 85 .

1992Enertrol Power Monitoring Corp. v. State of Oregon, supra, 108 Or App at 170 .