Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1948–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Harrisgreen1 sentence2019See Commonwealth v. Harris, 979 A.2d 387, 393 (Pa. Super. 2009) (“When an allegation is unsupported any citation to the record, such that this Court is prevented from assessing this issue and determining whether error exists, the allegation is waived for purposes of appeal.”). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Hammerred1 sentence2016See Hammer, 494 A.2d at 1060 (“On this record, whereas it appears that objection would be (Footnote Continued Next Page) -6- J-S46005-16 agree with the trial court that Appellant’s failure to object to the court’s questioning of defense witnesses constitutes waiver of his challenge to that questioning herein. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Jack Kaplangreen2 sentences1981See also U.S. v. Kaplan, 554 F.2d 577 (3d Cir. 1977). [8] Next, appellant argues that the improper questioning of a defense witness on cross-examination and improper rebuttal testimony by the Commonwealth combined to create reversible error. 1981See also U. S. v. Kaplan, 554 F.2d 577 (3d Cir. 1977). 8 Next, appellant argues that the improper questioning of a defense witness on cross-examination and improper rebuttal testimony by the Commonwealth combined to create reversible error. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Johnson, M., Aplt.
green
2 sentences2020No testimony was elicited from Detective Leeds even remotely suggesting that Carter did not understand the “direction and purpose of the questioning of the hearing.” See (Marcel) Johnson, 160 A.3d at 138 . - 10 - While we take no issue with the suppression court’s Findings of Fact and recognize we are, therefore, bound by them, we conclude that the suppression court did not did not properly apply the law to the facts as established at the suppression hearing. 2020No testimony was elicited from Detective Leeds even remotely suggesting that Carter did not understand the “direction and purpose of the questioning of the hearing.” See (Marcel) Johnson, 160 A.3d at 138 . - 10 - While we take no issue with the suppression court’s Findings of Fact and recognize we are, therefore, bound by them, we conclude that the suppression court did not properly apply the law to the facts as established at the suppression hearing. | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Edwards v. Arizona
green
1 sentence2024Appellant next contends that during the interview with the detectives at the police station, Appellant “clearly, affirmatively, and unambiguously indicated that he wished to consult with a lawyer” but Detective Eisenhauer continued the questioning in violation of Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , -9- 482 (1981). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Commonwealth v. Myma
green
2 sentences1979We believe the court’s questioning of appellant in no way amounts to advocacy by the court which our Supreme Court proscribed in Commonwealth v. Myma, 278 Pa. 505 , 123 A.2d 486 (1924) and Commonwealth v. Butler, 448 Pa. 128 , 291 A.2d 89 (1972). 1979We believe the court’s questioning of appellant in no way amounts to advocacy by the court which our Supreme Court proscribed in Commonwealth v. Myma, 278 Pa. 505 , 123 A.2d 486 (1924) and Commonwealth v. Butler, 448 Pa. 128 , 291 A.2d 89 (1972). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Commonwealth v. Butler
green
2 sentences1979We believe the court’s questioning of appellant in no way amounts to advocacy by the court which our Supreme Court proscribed in Commonwealth v. Myma, 278 Pa. 505 , 123 A.2d 486 (1924) and Commonwealth v. Butler, 448 Pa. 128 , 291 A.2d 89 (1972). 1979We believe the court’s questioning of appellant in no way amounts to advocacy by the court which our Supreme Court proscribed in Commonwealth v. Myma, 278 Pa. 505 , 123 A.2d 486 (1924) and Commonwealth v. Butler, 448 Pa. 128 , 291 A.2d 89 (1972). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Commonwealth v. Mimms
green
2 sentences1979Commonwealth v. Mimms, 477 Pa. 553 , 385 A.2d 334 (1978). 3 However, unlike the situation presented in Mimms , here the court sustained the objections to this questioning and the defense’s request to strike the testimony was granted. 1979Commonwealth v. Mimms, 477 Pa. 553 , 385 A.2d 334 (1978). 3 However, unlike the situation presented in Mimms , here the court sustained the objections to this questioning and the defense’s request to strike the testimony was granted. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Roth v. Marshall
green
2 sentences1951The court declared (p. 34): “As stated in Roth v. Marshall, 158 Pa. 272, 274 , 27 A. 945 , — ‘For an abuse of discretion or an act contrary to law the remedy is in the common pleas. . . .’ ” And (p. 35) : “. . . if the acts presently under attack should be deemed merely exercises of discretion, once it appears that they were based on a ‘misconception of law’, as the chancellor and the court en banc both concluded they were, equity looks with favor upon the questioning inquiry.” Going to the case proper, we find that the candidates were called to draw for positions in the order in which their n 1951The court declared (p. 34): “As stated in Roth v. Marshall, 158 Pa. 272, 274 , 27 A. 945 , — ‘For an abuse of discretion or an act contrary to law the remedy is in the common pleas. . . .’ ” And (p. 35) : “. . . if the acts presently under attack should be deemed merely exercises of discretion, once it appears that they were based on a ‘misconception of law’, as the chancellor and the court en banc both concluded they were, equity looks with favor upon the questioning inquiry.” Going to the case proper, we find that the candidates were called to draw for positions in the order in which their n | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Ritzman v. Coal Township School Directors
green
2 sentences1948For a further consideration of the decisions relative to the court’s power to review and correct the actions of a school board, see Ritzman v. Coal Township School Directors, 317 Pa. 271, 276-278 , 176 A. 447 ; also McLaughlin v. Lansford Borough School District, 335 Pa. 17, 23 , 6 A. 2d 291 . 1948For a further consideration of the decisions relative to the court’s power to review and correct the actions of a school board, see Ritzman v. Coal Township School Directors, 317 Pa. 271, 276-278 , 176 A. 447 ; also McLaughlin v. Lansford Borough School District, 335 Pa. 17, 23 , 6 A. 2d 291 . | 1 | 1948–1948 |
McLaughlin v. Lansford Borough School District
green
2 sentences1948For a further consideration of the decisions relative to the court’s power to review and correct the actions of a school board, see Ritzman v. Coal Township School Directors, 317 Pa. 271, 276-278 , 176 A. 447 ; also McLaughlin v. Lansford Borough School District, 335 Pa. 17, 23 , 6 A. 2d 291 . 1948For a further consideration of the decisions relative to the court’s power to review and correct the actions of a school board, see Ritzman v. Coal Township School Directors, 317 Pa. 271, 276-278 , 176 A. 447 ; also McLaughlin v. Lansford Borough School District, 335 Pa. 17, 23 , 6 A. 2d 291 . | 1 | 1948–1948 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.