elision is not favored doctrine (Tennessee) · Go Syfert
← Tennessee issues

elision is not favored doctrine in Tennessee

10 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1950–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Lowe's Companies, Inc. v. Cardwellgreen
tenn · 1991 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144, 186 (1992). ―Severability is of course a matter of state law.‖ Leavitt v. Jane L., 518 U.S. 137, 139 (1996). ―Under the doctrine of elision, a court may, under appropriate circumstances and in keeping with the expressed intent of a legislative body, elide an unconstitutional portion of a statute and find the remaining provisions to be constitutional and effective.‖ Lowe’s Companies, Inc. v. Cardwell, 813 S.W.2d 428, 430 (Tenn. 1991). ―The doctrine of elision is not favored,‖ Gibson Cty.

11
Leavitt v. Jane L.green
scotus · 1996 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144, 186 (1992). ―Severability is of course a matter of state law.‖ Leavitt v. Jane L., 518 U.S. 137, 139 (1996). ―Under the doctrine of elision, a court may, under appropriate circumstances and in keeping with the expressed intent of a legislative body, elide an unconstitutional portion of a statute and find the remaining provisions to be constitutional and effective.‖ Lowe’s Companies, Inc. v. Cardwell, 813 S.W.2d 428, 430 (Tenn. 1991). ―The doctrine of elision is not favored,‖ Gibson Cty.

11
New York v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 1992 · cited in 1 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144, 186 (1992). ―Severability is of course a matter of state law.‖ Leavitt v. Jane L., 518 U.S. 137, 139 (1996). ―Under the doctrine of elision, a court may, under appropriate circumstances and in keeping with the expressed intent of a legislative body, elide an unconstitutional portion of a statute and find the remaining provisions to be constitutional and effective.‖ Lowe’s Companies, Inc. v. Cardwell, 813 S.W.2d 428, 430 (Tenn. 1991). ―The doctrine of elision is not favored,‖ Gibson Cty.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Gibson County Special School District v. Palmer green
tenn · 1985
2 sentences

1994As we discussed in Gibson County Special School Dist. v. Palmer, 691 S.W.2d 544 (Tenn.1985): The doctrine of elision is not favored.

1994As we discussed in Gibson County Special School Dist. v. Palmer, 691 S.W.2d 544 (Tenn.1985): The doctrine of elision is not favored.

31991–1994
Smith v. City of Pigeon Forge neutral
tenn · 1980
2 sentences

1994Smith v. City of Pigeon Forge, Tenn., 600 S.W.2d 231 (1980).

1991Smith v. City of Pigeon Forge, Tennessee, 600 S.W.2d 231 (1980).

31985–1994
Edwards v. Davis neutral
tenn · 1922
2 sentences

1980Davidson County v. Elrod, 191 Tenn. 109 , 232 S.W.2d 1 (1950); Edwards v. Davis, 146 Tenn. 615 , 244 S.W.2d 359 (1922).

1980Davidson County v. Elrod, 191 Tenn. 109 , 232 S.W.2d 1 (1950); Edwards v. Davis, 146 Tenn. 615 , 244 S.W.2d 359 (1922).

21950–1980
DAVIDSON COUNTY v. Elrod green
tenn · 1950
2 sentences

1963Probably that may be a reason why the doctrine of elision is not favored.” 191 Tenn. 109 , 232 S.W.2d 1 .

1963Probably that may be a reason why the doctrine of elision is not favored.” 191 Tenn. 109 , 232 S.W.2d 1 .

21963–1980
Armistead v. Karsch green
tenn · 1951
2 sentences

1979The doctrine of elision is not favored in the law, Armistead v. Karseh, 192 Tenn. 137 , 237 S.W.2d 960 (1951).

1979The doctrine of elision is not favored in the law, Armistead v. Karseh, 192 Tenn. 137 , 237 S.W.2d 960 (1951).

11979–1979

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 1-3-110 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check