Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ely v. Brileygreen2 sentences2002In an action between private parties to determine whether a constructively severed mineral interest is subject to the doctrine of accretion, in Ely v. Briley, 959 S.W.2d 723 (Tex.App.--Austin 1998, no pet.) the court held that because a "trespass to try title action" was the exclusive remedy to resolve conflicting claims to property, the declaratory judgment rules were not applicable. 2002In an action between private parties to determine whether a constructively severed mineral interest is subject to the doctrine of accretion, in Ely v. Briley, 959 S.W.2d 723 (Tex.App.--Austin 1998, no pet.) the court held that because a “trespass to try title action” was the exclusive remedy to resolve conflicting claims to property, the declaratory judgment rules were not applicable. | 2 | 6 |
Fulton v. Frandoliggreen2 sentences1999Id. at 330-332. 1999Id. at 330-332 . | 1 | 2 |
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Companygreen2 sentences1989Co. v. Sun Oil Co., 190 F.2d 191 , 196 (5th Cir.), reh'g denied, 191 F.2d 705 (5th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 920 (1952) (citing State v. Balli, 190 S.W.2d 71 (Tex. 1944) "by the doctrine of accretion, any new alluvion that forms above the tide-line becomes a part of the contiguous upland estate"). 1989Co. v. Sun Oil Co., 190 F.2d 191, 196 (5th Cir.), reh's denied, 191 F.2d 705 (5th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 920 (1952) (citing State, 190 S.W.2d 71 (Tex. 1944) 'Iby the doctrine of accretion, any new alluvion that forms above the tide-line becomes a part of the contiguous upland estate"). | 1 | 2 |
City of Corpus Christi v. Davisgreen1 sentence1999See City of Corpus Christi v. Davis, 622 S.W.2d 640, 646 (Tex. App. C Corpus Christi 1981, writ ref = d n.r.e.). [2] Texas recognizes the doctrine of accretion, under which the owner of riparian land gains title to land that accretes to his or her property by natural and imperceptible deposit. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-Davy
green
2 sentences2002Even if declaratory relief is available in an action between private parties, IT-Davy demonstrates that legislative consent is essential to the action for declaratory judgment when the State is a party. 74 S.W.3d at 855 . 2002Even if declaratory relief is available in an action between private parties, IT-Davy demonstrates that legislative consent is essential to the action for declaratory judgment when the State is a party. 74 S.W.3d at 855 . | 4 | 2002–2002 |
Nilsen v. Tenneco Oil Co.
green
2 sentences1998In Nilsen v. Tenneco, 614 P.2d 36 (Okla.1980), and Jackson v. Burlington Northern, 205 Mont. 200 , 667 P.2d 406 (1983), the highest courts of two sister states also resolved this issue in the affirmative. 1998In Nilsen v. Tenneco , 614 P.2d 36 (Okla. 1980), and Jackson v. Burlington Northern , 667 P.2d 406 (Montana 1983), the highest courts of two sister states also resolved this issue in the affirmative. , complain that the trial court abused its discretion by requiring each party to pay its own attorney's fees. | 2 | 1998–1998 |
Jackson v. Burlington Northern Inc.
green
2 sentences1998In Nilsen v. Tenneco, 614 P.2d 36 (Okla.1980), and Jackson v. Burlington Northern, 205 Mont. 200 , 667 P.2d 406 (1983), the highest courts of two sister states also resolved this issue in the affirmative. 1998In Nilsen v. Tenneco , 614 P.2d 36 (Okla. 1980), and Jackson v. Burlington Northern , 667 P.2d 406 (Montana 1983), the highest courts of two sister states also resolved this issue in the affirmative. , complain that the trial court abused its discretion by requiring each party to pay its own attorney's fees. | 2 | 1998–1998 |
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.
green
2 sentences1989Co. v. Sun Oil Co., 190 F.2d 191 , 196 (5th Cir.), reh'g denied, 191 F.2d 705 (5th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 920 (1952) (citing State v. Balli, 190 S.W.2d 71 (Tex. 1944) "by the doctrine of accretion, any new alluvion that forms above the tide-line becomes a part of the contiguous upland estate"). 1989Co. v. Sun Oil Co., 190 F.2d 191, 196 (5th Cir.), reh's denied, 191 F.2d 705 (5th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 920 (1952) (citing State, 190 S.W.2d 71 (Tex. 1944) 'Iby the doctrine of accretion, any new alluvion that forms above the tide-line becomes a part of the contiguous upland estate"). | 2 | 1989–1989 |
United States v. Coplon
green
2 sentences1989Co. v. Sun Oil Co., 190 F.2d 191 , 196 (5th Cir.), reh'g denied, 191 F.2d 705 (5th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 920 (1952) (citing State v. Balli, 190 S.W.2d 71 (Tex. 1944) "by the doctrine of accretion, any new alluvion that forms above the tide-line becomes a part of the contiguous upland estate"). 1989Co. v. Sun Oil Co., 190 F.2d 191, 196 (5th Cir.), reh's denied, 191 F.2d 705 (5th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 920 (1952) (citing State, 190 S.W.2d 71 (Tex. 1944) 'Iby the doctrine of accretion, any new alluvion that forms above the tide-line becomes a part of the contiguous upland estate"). | 2 | 1989–1989 |
State of Texas v. Balli
green
2 sentences1989Co. v. Sun Oil Co., 190 F.2d 191 , 196 (5th Cir.), reh'g denied, 191 F.2d 705 (5th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 920 (1952) (citing State v. Balli, 190 S.W.2d 71 (Tex. 1944) "by the doctrine of accretion, any new alluvion that forms above the tide-line becomes a part of the contiguous upland estate"). 1989Co. v. Sun Oil Co., 190 F.2d 191, 196 (5th Cir.), reh's denied, 191 F.2d 705 (5th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 920 (1952) (citing State, 190 S.W.2d 71 (Tex. 1944) 'Iby the doctrine of accretion, any new alluvion that forms above the tide-line becomes a part of the contiguous upland estate"). | 2 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.