Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1921–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. Andersongreen2 sentences2008Brown v. Anderson, 102 S.W.3d 245, 250 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2003, pet. denied). 2008Brown v. Anderson, 102 S.W.3d 245, 250 (Tex. App.–Beaumont 2003, pet. denied). | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2015A||egation number 5 alleged that Escami||a violated the 19th condition of his probation in that he failed to provide verification of working the required community service hours for the months of June 2010, Ju|y 2010, August 2010, September 2010, October 2010, and November 2010, and is delinquent 42.50 hours of community service restitution The court did not find this allegation to be true. 3 The standard for establishing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is enunciated in Strz`cklana' v. Washz`ngton, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). 2015The standard for establishing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is enunciated in Strickland v. Washington, supra. In support of an ineffective assistance claim, the petitioner must show (l) counsel’s performance was deficient, and (2) the deficient performance may have prejudiced the petitioner’s case. | 5 | 2007–2015 |
Dobbs v. Russell
green
1 sentence1962The Court of Civil Appeals reversed and rendered, holding: (a) *284 that the claim was rejected by operation of law at the end of thirty days after it was filed with the Clerk; (b) that the debt was extinguished when petitioners did not institute suit within ninety days thereafter; and (c) that equitable estoppel could not save petitioners from the consequences of their delay. 347 S.W. 2d 796 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
White v. Texas Motorcar & Supply Co.
neutral
1 sentence1921On appeal, that part of the judgment of the trial court establishing the claim and lien of Saunders and foreclosing the lien was reversed, and judgment rendered that Saunders take nothing by his suit; the judgment of the trial court in all other respects being affirmed. 203 S. W. 441 . | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.