Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
James v. Stategreen2 sentences2018Clay v. State, 390 S.W.3d 1, 13 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2012, pet. ref’d) (citing James v. State, 102 S.W.3d 162, 181 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, pet. ref’d)). 2013Grant v. State, 247 S.W.3d 360, 367 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008, pet. ref’d) (citing James v. State, 102 S.W.3d 162, 181 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, pet. ref’d)). | 5 | 5 |
Wheeler v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Wheeler v. State, 67 S.W.3d 879, 885 (Tex.Crim.App. 2002); Shipman v. State, 604 S.W.2d 182, 184-85 (Tex.Crim.App. 1980). 2015Wheeler v. State, 67 S.W.3d 879, 885 (Tex.Crim.App. 2002); Shipman v. State, 604 S.W.2d 182, 184-85 (Tex.Crim.App. 1980). | 5 | 5 |
Shipman v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Wheeler v. State, 67 S.W.3d 879, 885 (Tex.Crim.App. 2002); Shipman v. State, 604 S.W.2d 182, 184-85 (Tex.Crim.App. 1980). 2015Wheeler v. State, 67 S.W.3d 879, 885 (Tex.Crim.App. 2002); Shipman v. State, 604 S.W.2d 182, 184-85 (Tex.Crim.App. 1980). | 3 | 3 |
Cedric Charles Clay v. Stategreen1 sentence2018Clay v. State, 390 S.W.3d 1, 13 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2012, pet. ref’d) (citing James v. State, 102 S.W.3d 162, 181 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, pet. ref’d)). | 1 | 1 |
Grant v. Stategreen1 sentence2013Grant v. State, 247 S.W.3d 360, 367 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008, pet. ref’d) (citing James v. State, 102 S.W.3d 162, 181 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, pet. ref’d)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.