Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Fuseliergreen2 sentences2015In re Fuselier, 56 S.W.3d 265, 268 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). 2007In re Fuselier, 56 S.W.3d 265, 268 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). | 3 | 3 |
Bockemehl v. Bockemehlgreen2 sentences2014Bockemehl v. Bockemehl, 604 S.W.2d 466, 469-70 (Tex. Civ. 1983Bockemehl, supra, 604 S.W.2d at 469 . | 1 | 2 |
Flores v. Stategreen1 sentence2026“As a matter of law, the trial court has the authority to add the affirmative finding to the judgment even without any request from the State, if the facts support that finding.” Bowman v. State, No. 09-24-0322-CR, 2025 WL 2972653 , at *15 4 The circumstances here are more favorable to a finding of a clerical error: Appellant pled guilty to the charged offense of aggravated assault, his judicial confession stated that all affirmative findings made by the trial court were true, and the trial court’s order of deferred adjudication included a deadly weapon finding and a special finding that Appel | 1 | 1 |
Rawlins v. Rawlinsgreen1 sentence2023Gedney v. Gedney, 12 No. 09-10-00521-CV, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 3252 , at *6 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Apr. 26, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.) (citing Rawlins v. Rawlins, 324 S.W.3d 852, 855 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, no pet.)). | 1 | 1 |
Claxton v. (Upper) Lake Fork Water Control & Improvement District No. 1green1 sentence2016No. 1, 220 S.W.3d 537, 545 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2006, pet. denied), (op. on reh’g) (“Even though it is presumed that the trial judge’s personal recollection supports the finding of a clerical error, the record from the hearing on the motion for judgment nunc pro tunc may negate any such presumption through evidence to the contrary.”). | 1 | 1 |
Wood v. Paulusgreen1 sentence2015Co. v. Roberts, 98 Tex. 42 , 81 S.W. 25, 26 (1904); Blum v. Neilson, 59 Tex. 378 (1883); Wood v. Paulus, 524 S.W.2d 749, 756 (Tex.Civ.App.-Corpus Christi 1975, writ ref'd n.r.e.). [25] Even though it is presumed that the trial judge's personal recollection supports the finding of a clerical error, 8 the record from the hearing on the motion for judgment nunc pro tunc may negate any such presumption through evidence to the contrary. | 1 | 1 |
Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. Robertsgreen2 sentences2015Co. v. Roberts, 98 Tex. 42 , 81 S.W. 25, 26 (1904); Blum v. Neilson, 59 Tex. 378 (1883); Wood v. Paulus, 524 S.W.2d 749, 756 (Tex.Civ.App.-Corpus Christi 1975, writ ref'd n.r.e.). [25] Even though it is presumed that the trial judge's personal recollection supports the finding of a clerical error, 8 the record from the hearing on the motion for judgment nunc pro tunc may negate any such presumption through evidence to the contrary. 2015Co. v. Roberts, 98 Tex. 42 , 81 S.W. 25, 26 (1904); Blum v. Neilson, 59 Tex. 378 (1883); Wood v. Paulus, 524 S.W.2d 749, 756 (Tex.Civ.App.-Corpus Christi 1975, writ ref'd n.r.e.). [25] Even though it is presumed that the trial judge's personal recollection supports the finding of a clerical error, 8 the record from the hearing on the motion for judgment nunc pro tunc may negate any such presumption through evidence to the contrary. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re A.M.C.
green
1 sentence2023In re A.M.C., 491 S.W.3d at 67 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Blum v. Neilson
neutral
1 sentence2015Co. v. Roberts, 98 Tex. 42 , 81 S.W. 25, 26 (1904); Blum v. Neilson, 59 Tex. 378 (1883); Wood v. Paulus, 524 S.W.2d 749, 756 (Tex.Civ.App.-Corpus Christi 1975, writ ref'd n.r.e.). [25] Even though it is presumed that the trial judge's personal recollection supports the finding of a clerical error, 8 the record from the hearing on the motion for judgment nunc pro tunc may negate any such presumption through evidence to the contrary. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Pruet v. Coastal States Trading, Inc.
green
1 sentence1998Id. | 1 | 1998–1998 |