Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thordson v. City of Houstongreen2 sentences2010See Thordson, 815 S.W.2d at 551 (holding, under language of rule 165a(4) requiring that judge “shall” set hearing on motion to reinstate as soon as practicable, it was not within trial court’s discretion to fail to hold a hearing on motion to reinstate). 2010See Thordson, 815 S.W.2d at 551 (holding, under language of rule 165a(4) requiring that judge Ashall@ set hearing on motion to reinstate as soon as practicable, it was not within trial court=s discretion to fail to hold a hearing on motion to reinstate). | 3 | 3 |
Goodyear Dunlop Tires North America, Ltd. v. Gamezgreen2 sentences2007P. 173.4; Gamez, 151 S.W.3d at 583 (discussing the mandates of rule 173 before February 1, 2005). 5 . 2006P. 173.4; Gamez, 151 S.W.3d at 583 (discussing the mandates of rule 173 before February 1, 2005). | 3 | 3 |
In Re Completerx, Ltd.green1 sentence2015See id.; see also In re CompleteRx, Ltd., 366 S.W.3d 318, 324-325 (Tex. App.--Tyler 2012, orig. proceeding) (“For this court to relax the mandates of the rule would be tantamount to amending established rules of procedure. [ ] This rulemaking power is invested solely in the Supreme Court of Texas. [ ] Accordingly, we hold the trial court clearly abused its discretion when it granted Good Shepherd's motion for modification of [TEX. | 1 | 1 |
Bourgeois v. Colliergreen1 sentence2013See Bourgeois. 959 S.W.2d at 246 . | 1 | 1 |
Metro Dairy Queen Stores v. Dominguezgreen1 sentence2012Metro Dairy Queen Stores v. Dominguez, 883 S.W.2d 322, 324 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1994, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
In Re MPBgreen1 sentence2010Even if a party complies with the mandates of rule 216, the party must act affirmatively to secure his right to a jury trial by either “object[ing] on the record to the trial court’s action [in proceeding without a jury] or indicat[ing] affirmatively on the record [he] intends to stand on his perfected right to a jury trial.” Sunwest Reliance Acquisitions Group, Inc. v. Provident Nat’l Assurance Co., 875 S.W.2d 385, 387 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1993, no writ); see also In re M.P.B., 257 S.W.3d 804, 811 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.) (holding appellant waived right to jury trial by failing to object | 1 | 1 |
Sunwest Reliance Acquisitions Group, Inc. v. Provident National Assurance Co.green1 sentence2010Even if a party complies with the mandates of rule 216, the party must act affirmatively to secure his right to a jury trial by either “object[ing] on the record to the trial court’s action [in proceeding without a jury] or indicat[ing] affirmatively on the record [he] intends to stand on his perfected right to a jury trial.” Sunwest Reliance Acquisitions Group, Inc. v. Provident Nat’l Assurance Co., 875 S.W.2d 385, 387 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1993, no writ); see also In re M.P.B., 257 S.W.3d 804, 811 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.) (holding appellant waived right to jury trial by failing to object | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.